depotofrelax

2000 D60HF new flyer #5471 now at Gun Hill Depot. Still have Micheal J. Quill Depot decal.

Look, you've been told repeatedly by the mods and members of this forum to stop asking these dumb questions. Nearly all of them have no basis in facts and in reality.

 

And anyway, your grammar is horrible. I don't even know what you wrote there. "You trying to give loser", what?

 

or are you trying threat me. That stalking issuing. Why can't be yourself except stalking me.

Look, you've been told repeatedly by the mods and members of this forum to stop asking these dumb questions. Nearly all of them have no basis in facts and in reality.

 

And anyway, your grammar is horrible. I don't even know what you wrote there. "You trying to give loser", what?

 

are you trying to stalk me or trying threat am i the only person you can treat very well respect is that dumb question. Why are you threat am i the only from you. that assulting. it that dumb question.

Not for nothing kid, but could you stop it with the dumb questions. It has already been stated time and again that no one really knows where the 62As will wind up at. In this very thread no less. The only certainties we have are: 1) the 142AMs/188s will run on the 7 in the near future, and 2) the 62As will be displaced. To where has yet to be determined. When we know, you'll know. Spamming this thread (and the forum in general) will not solve anything. All it will lead to is you being banned.

 

is that threat to me . You trying to give loser

Did the subway swamp just started . Which line will get .

I haven't been on those CNG O7s for some time now (never had a need to ride a JG route lately), but I'll try to keep it in mind the next time I catch one.

 

I am sorry. Almost West Farms Depot have all of Jackie Gleason Orion7CNG. It like example It all about College Point Depot Orion5CNG similar or generic want to be 100% Orion7CNG that 1 depot don't want to keep then later it want it back . It like flip flop only i can say.

When will 2000 D60HF new flyer #5270 - #5290 series at West Farms Depot thto e retirement bus will head back to Eastchester Depot for scrapped. Let the retirement bus head to Eastchester Depot for scrapped

Yesterday I spotted 1998 Orion5 #6120 at. Gun Hill. Depot. & running Bx28 line. Or they loaning.

when will the 2 remaining 1996 RTS Nova Bus #9206 , #9219 at Fresh Pond Depot will retire or scrapped. Fresh Pond Depot will be free from not to carry 1996 RTS nova Bus when #9206 , #9219 etc are retire or scrapped. Which bus will replace remaining 2 1996 RTS NOva bus #9206 , #9219 at Fresh Pond depot.

@depotofrelax, They will most likely go to MTA Bus as a few of them have been overhauled.........And on a greneral note 9340 O/S scrap.

 

Thanks. As you know I said . I maybe wrong you know 126 street depot start to give away their bus. After 126 street depot going to be shut down. Thanks i apologize.

The remaining 5 1996 RTS Nova Bus left at 126 street depot , #8989 , #8990 , #9122 , #9216 , #9221. Will those remaining 5 1996 RTS Nova Bus left will they be scrapped or retire. There retirement came.

Because the 2 option order Nova Bus LFS articulated ( those are former model 2000 D60HF number ) #5253 - #5363 been taken.

Any news 2012 model Nova Bus LFS articulated bus #5817 will it still stay at Gun Hill Depot . #5817 still have West Farms Depot sticker decal or go to Kingsbridge depot. & where is 2000 D60HF new flyer #5268 , #5355 , #5358 . Will #5355 , #5268 , #5358. be retired, or renumber . I will miss 2000 D60HF new flyer #5268 , #5355 , #5358 if it be retired.

when R188 conversion get delivered while 126 car is new . Where will first be delivered to which yard & where will the R188 be tested . I am 100% R188 will be delivered to 207 street yard then head to UnionPort Yard , R188 will be tested Eastchester Dyre Avenue Branch that 5 line . Then head to Corona Yard. That how the R142/R142A was delivered to .

Now i start to spot again but recently i don't at Westchester Yard. I mostly spot R142A of 4 line as Not in Service go to Westchester Yard. But when R142 of 4 & 5 line as Not in Service went to Westchester Yard. If some say Westchester Yard have bad maintence .

@AndrewJC

 

As Far Rock Depot explain in a previous post, the lines where the run on are older than the IRT Flushing Line. I'd rather have CBTC installed on the ENTIRE Jerome Avenue, Dyre Avenue, White Plains Road, Pelham, and Lexington Avenue lines since the and EVEN the part-time are arguably buiser and way more demanding than the . Those lines have higher ridership and serve high pollitical hoods and that also includes the even though its fleet is R62A's while the , while it does have a good ridership, is mainly a supplement.

 

I can bet that its feasible that they can keep the R62As on the Flushing line and the existing signals until the R62A's replacements finally arrive. The is already frequent as it is, even if it is isolated like the and has high ridership which scores better than many other lines ONLY because they are shorter and self contained lines. This is why I don't even agree with this Flushing CBTC/R188 plan any way. Since both the and 's cars get regularly maintained due to their shorter and insolated lines which is why they have well on-time preformances and higher MDBFs.....

 

I agree installed CBTC should be installed White plains Road Line ( that Unionport Yard & 239 street yard home of 2 & 5 line are capable to handle CBTC , Pelham Line capable to handle. That Westchester Yard can handle. )

Which yard is R62A singles that uses for 42 street shuttle is based out of ? If those R62A single were to come back to Lexington Avenue line. the R62A singles are #1901 - #2155 ( 254 cars ) R62A #1909 is scrapped.

Any news 1996 Orion5 #639 , #647 at Casey Stengal Depot final 2 remaining have been scrapped. if so , there bus are fully good shape with all new bus. No need final 2 remaining 1996 Orion5 #639 , #647. Just Saying.

Exactly!

 

 

 

 

Weren't you the one who wanted them there? I don't see what's wrong with it. This is such a repeat of the same thread fifteen pages ago.

As car get older it was not me. The new car get purchase for the line that never get new cars . That line will receive old cars. Still i may kind of agree. I apologize . When R142A was purchase for 4 & 6 line. To replace what ever old cars they had . That next classic car will move to another line the yard well equipped with NTT cars yet. Like this topic R62A went to 6 line from 7 line. Now R62A might go back to 6 line. When R62A get retired. The 6 line or what ever yard had R62 will get new car for replacing R62A or R62. the R62A / R62 will turn 30 years old next year 2013? 10 years left to service for R62A/R62. I apologize.

Why does that matter, It was 20 years ago...

I agree but the issue topic you know . Why send R62 / R62A back to Lexington Avenue . Sending back R62A to Lexington Avenue going out of touch . That i can say.

Fine, then I guess the entire reason why the is doing this is because the IRT Flushing Line is the oldest out of all the IRT lines in the subway. And or riders have to deal with the R62s or R62As. At first I thought they were doing this because they "want" the to use the R142As/R188s (making the strip maps of the 's R142As a waste of money and serving no purpose) until now since nobody (except you and Art) has explain why the is doing this.

 

The only thing I can say here is the only alternative to replacing the Flushing signal system now is to keep the existing signals hobbling along until the time comes to replace the R62As like you said earlier and I'm sure its feasible...

 

You mean R62 from 3 line #1301 - #1625 built by Kawasaki car not the Bombardier car is coming back to Lexington Avenue Line?The R62 was the worst car in Lexington Avenue Line. How many subway car accident was there. Who forgot #1431 - #1432 - #1433 - #1435 - #1436 - #1437 - #1438 - #1439 - #1440 had a subway accident or something or what ever. Now #1431 - #1432 - #1433 - #1434 - #1438 are paired up as 5 car unit.

 

Now you are speaking English...

 

being funny it like being a comedian.

¿Qué? Yo no hablo tu idioma.

 

I do not speak Spanish language. Si Senor mucho gracias . lol. I am not Spanish .

When was the last time R142A/R188 had ran on the 7 line. Are they very sure after testing R142A/ R188 there will be no issue . Example did it R142A/R188 had 3rd rail problem for what reason. when was the last time it ran on the 7 line.

So how many new car R188 146 new cars will replace remaining few set R33 world fair & R36 World car , chance replacing R28 / R29 / R33 #8806 - #9305 at union port yard. Having 146 cars can at least retire R28 / R29 / R33 . R36 at least not being used at Corona Yard not work equipment car , & at least replaced R26 / R28 / R29 / R33 / R36 at least unionport yard. R142A will be converted to R188 that 360 cars. But 146 is new cars. At least they probably can use R62A for work equipment cars.

So that mean 5% they won't be any issue when R142A running into 7 line into Steinway tunnel. Who keep forgetting no cause of problem R142A running into Steinway tunnel. So if R142A does go to 7 line. There are some set 6 line will keep R142A . So will 6 line will receive new cars when R62A do retire. If R62A does go to 6 line.