Jump to content

Bored Like a Shinigami - So I Came up with an idea that I wanted to share… NYC Subway Solution?


Recommended Posts

A Theoretical Solution For NYC Subway (Discussion)


(A) -  207 - Lefferts: CPW/8 Av/Fulton St Exp (I wonder if Far Rock A and Lefferts E is a better choice?) 

(C) - BPB - WTC: Concourse Lcl, CPW/8 Av Lcl (50 St upper level is served, Concourse Yard is its home, E merges with A to Express, CPW Local belongs to 8 Av Lcl and Broadway Lcl) 

(E) - 179 - Far Rockaway: QBL Exp - 53rd St - 8 Av/Fulton St Exp (If E goes to Far Rock, it has to go to 179 St and swap with F in northern queens. I actually am debating putting A to Far Rock and E to Lefferts if E goes to 179 St) 

(B) - 205 - Coney: Concourse RH Exp, CPW/6 Av Exp, Brighton Local (Here B gives Bronx direct access to Coney Island, also CPW Exp belongs to 8 Av Exp and 6 Av Exp) 

(F) -  JC - Coney: QBL Exp - 53rd St, 6 Av/Culver Lcl (Deinterlines the merge at Queens Plaza bringing F back to that station while Orange Q covers the 63rd Street portion) 

(Qorange) -  71 Av - Brighton Beach: QBL Lcl - 63rd St, 6 Av/Brighton Exp (Nostalgia, why not?)

(N) -  Astoria - Coney: Astoria Line - 60 St, Bway/4 Av Exp - Sea Beach (with Broadway Local to CPW local and Queens bound trains on the Broadway Express, N train may now skip 49 Street) 

(R) -  71 Av - Bay Ridge-95 St: QBL Lcl - 60 St, Bway/4 Av Exp (4 Av Lcl south of 36 St with vanshook’s proposed switches. Also R follows the Broadway Express trend as N) 

(W) -  168 St - Coney: CPW/Bway Lcl - Montague St - 4 Av Lcl - West End (From 57 St - 7 Av the local tracks could connect to 59 St - Columbus Circle and go local to CPW) 

(J) -   JC - Broad St - Jamaica Lcl 

<J> -  JC - Broad St - Jamaica Exp (Who needs the Z train?)

Brown M - Metropolitan Av - Chambers St: Myrtle Av Lcl

OR

(M) - 96 St - Metropolitan Av: 2 Av Line - 63rd St , 6 Av/Myrtle Av Lcl (This could be our quick fix to fill the void in 2 Av, at least until the T shows up and replaces Orange M thus putting it back to brown.) 

(T) - 125 St - Euclid Av: 2 Av/Fulton St Lcl - The unused tracks at Hoyt-Schimmerhorn that lead to Court St are connected to Hanover Sq from 2 Av 

 

I make this thread with the belief that 2 Av Subway is flawed and should be modified.

Food for thought. Agree? Disagree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


5 hours ago, MTA Researcher said:

A Theoretical Solution For NYC Subway (Discussion)


(A) -  207 - Lefferts: CPW/8 Av/Fulton St Exp (I wonder if Far Rock A and Lefferts E is a better choice?) 

(C) - BPB - WTC: Concourse Lcl, CPW/8 Av Lcl (50 St upper level is served, Concourse Yard is its home, E merges with A to Express, CPW Local belongs to 8 Av Lcl and Broadway Lcl) 

(E) - 179 - Far Rockaway: QBL Exp - 53rd St - 8 Av/Fulton St Exp (If E goes to Far Rock, it has to go to 179 St and swap with F in northern queens. I actually am debating putting A to Far Rock and E to Lefferts if E goes to 179 St) 

(B) - 205 - Coney: Concourse RH Exp, CPW/6 Av Exp, Brighton Local (Here B gives Bronx direct access to Coney Island, also CPW Exp belongs to 8 Av Exp and 6 Av Exp) 

(F) -  JC - Coney: QBL Exp - 53rd St, 6 Av/Culver Lcl (Deinterlines the merge at Queens Plaza bringing F back to that station while Orange Q covers the 63rd Street portion) 

(Qorange) -  71 Av - Brighton Beach: QBL Lcl - 63rd St, 6 Av/Brighton Exp (Nostalgia, why not?)

(N) -  Astoria - Coney: Astoria Line - 60 St, Bway/4 Av Exp - Sea Beach (with Broadway Local to CPW local and Queens bound trains on the Broadway Express, N train may now skip 49 Street) 

(R) -  71 Av - Bay Ridge-95 St: QBL Lcl - 60 St, Bway/4 Av Exp (4 Av Lcl south of 36 St with vanshook’s proposed switches. Also R follows the Broadway Express trend as N) 

(W) -  168 St - Coney: CPW/Bway Lcl - Montague St - 4 Av Lcl - West End (From 57 St - 7 Av the local tracks could connect to 59 St - Columbus Circle and go local to CPW) 

(J) -   JC - Broad St - Jamaica Lcl 

<J> -  JC - Broad St - Jamaica Exp (Who needs the Z train?)

Brown M - Metropolitan Av - Chambers St: Myrtle Av Lcl

OR

(M) - 96 St - Metropolitan Av: 2 Av Line - 63rd St , 6 Av/Myrtle Av Lcl (This could be our quick fix to fill the void in 2 Av, at least until the T shows up and replaces Orange M thus putting it back to brown.) 

- (T)125 St - Euclid Av: 2 Av/Fulton St Lcl - The unused tracks at Hoyt-Schimmerhorn that lead to Court St are connected to Hanover Sq from 2 Av 

 

I make this thread with the belief that 2 Av Subway is flawed and should be modified.

Food for thought. Agree? Disagree?

They will never use those tracks that lead up to court street st for revenue service (aka the transit museum) ever again. Been closed for decades. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MTA Researcher said:

A Theoretical Solution For NYC Subway (Discussion)


(A) -  207 - Lefferts: CPW/8 Av/Fulton St Exp (I wonder if Far Rock A and Lefferts E is a better choice?) 

(C) - BPB - WTC: Concourse Lcl, CPW/8 Av Lcl (50 St upper level is served, Concourse Yard is its home, E merges with A to Express, CPW Local belongs to 8 Av Lcl and Broadway Lcl) 

(E) - 179 - Far Rockaway: QBL Exp - 53rd St - 8 Av/Fulton St Exp (If E goes to Far Rock, it has to go to 179 St and swap with F in northern queens. I actually am debating putting A to Far Rock and E to Lefferts if E goes to 179 St) 

(B) - 205 - Coney: Concourse RH Exp, CPW/6 Av Exp, Brighton Local (Here B gives Bronx direct access to Coney Island, also CPW Exp belongs to 8 Av Exp and 6 Av Exp) 

(F) -  JC - Coney: QBL Exp - 53rd St, 6 Av/Culver Lcl (Deinterlines the merge at Queens Plaza bringing F back to that station while Orange Q covers the 63rd Street portion) 

(Qorange) -  71 Av - Brighton Beach: QBL Lcl - 63rd St, 6 Av/Brighton Exp (Nostalgia, why not?)

(N) -  Astoria - Coney: Astoria Line - 60 St, Bway/4 Av Exp - Sea Beach (with Broadway Local to CPW local and Queens bound trains on the Broadway Express, N train may now skip 49 Street) 

(R) -  71 Av - Bay Ridge-95 St: QBL Lcl - 60 St, Bway/4 Av Exp (4 Av Lcl south of 36 St with vanshook’s proposed switches. Also R follows the Broadway Express trend as N) 

(W) -  168 St - Coney: CPW/Bway Lcl - Montague St - 4 Av Lcl - West End (From 57 St - 7 Av the local tracks could connect to 59 St - Columbus Circle and go local to CPW) 

(J) -   JC - Broad St - Jamaica Lcl 

<J> -  JC - Broad St - Jamaica Exp (Who needs the Z train?)

Brown M - Metropolitan Av - Chambers St: Myrtle Av Lcl

OR

(M) - 96 St - Metropolitan Av: 2 Av Line - 63rd St , 6 Av/Myrtle Av Lcl (This could be our quick fix to fill the void in 2 Av, at least until the T shows up and replaces Orange M thus putting it back to brown.) 

(T) - 125 St - Euclid Av: 2 Av/Fulton St Lcl - The unused tracks at Hoyt-Schimmerhorn that lead to Court St are connected to Hanover Sq from 2 Av 

 

I make this thread with the belief that 2 Av Subway is flawed and should be modified.

Food for thought. Agree? Disagree?

  • Swap the (A) and (E)'s southern terminal, let the (A) continue to Far Rockaway which can also serve Rockaway Park while the (E) serves Lefferts as it's already running a fairly long distance.
  • Not exactly sure how well this is going to work mainly because I doubt the (C) will be able to serve Concourse full time instead of rush hour only. There's also the issue of the lack of a 2nd local service so who knows how frequent the (C) is going to be running. The only other issue is that this line most likely cannot serve outside of weekdays
  • Might as well call the (B) a (D) because it's been around longer for full time service. 
  • Why are the (E) and (F)'s northern terminal swapped? 
  • The only way for the <J> to run is if there is express a 3rd track east of Broadway Junction, unfortunately there isn't. If you were to build a new track that runs directly along Jamaica Av from Broadway Junction leading to Cypress Hills station, this can theoretically work. The only downside is that stations along the Fulton St portion would not get any kind of express service.
  • The (M) and (Qorange) are going to have issues with each other because of the merge between Rockefeller Center and Lexington Av-63 St. The (M) is coming from the local tracks while the (Qorange) is coming from the express tracks with both splitting up immediately after 57 St. Something about this needs to change. Brighton riders also prefer Broadway service over 6 Av service. This last bit doesn't really matter much, but it's definitely a factor the MTA would have to consider nonetheless. As for the Brown M, there's definitely no way that is going to return. The (M) is a revolutionary line that gave Brooklyn-Broadway and Myrtle Av riders direct access going uptown. The Brown M is not going to make a return unless something forces it to return such as a severed connection of the Chrystie St tunnel to Broadway-Lafayette St. 
  • No issues with how the (N) and (R) are running. The (R) is definitely going to see an increase in ridership with direct express service north of 36 St all the way into and through Manhattan.
  • The (W) is an interesting case, the new connection from Broadway to CPW is definitely something worth an investment. However, there's no way the (W) is going to have a connection to Columbus Circle station, it's going to be a rather right curve to construct.

The only other thing I have to say is that some of these ideas are cool concepts while others being questionable. The SAS is definitely flawed, at least the current layout projected. Although that wasn't an enough reason to go and make a separate thread. That thread already exists here: 

 

5 hours ago, Joel Powers said:

They will never use those tracks that lead up to court street st for revenue service (aka the transit museum) ever again. Been closed for decades. 

You literally cannot know whether or not Court St will be used again. The decision is up to the MTA themselves, just because it's been closed for decades, it doesn't mean they can never again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Vulturious said:

You literally cannot know whether or not Court St will be used again. The decision is up to the MTA themselves, just because it's been closed for decades, it doesn't mean they can never again.

Judging from the recent actions made by the MTA (partially walling off the abandoned platforms) its safe to say, it won't be used again in revenue service.

 

Second Avenue subway past Phase II is a pipe dream anyways, We'll be lucky we get phase II done by the end of 2030s

Edited by Mtatransit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.