Q64Extention

It's better to get rid of P.M. rush hourly LTD service to Flushing on the Q17, because they are never full, and the Q27, with more ridership, does that as well (not having P.M. rush hour LTD service to Flushing). Regarding short turning a few Q27's, I don't think it will be liked by people who can't read much English, because they would be surprised that it is going on Parsons Blvd instead of Kissena, or Hollis Court Blvd. instead of going on 47th Avenue. This is the third time I've mentioned extending the Q26, but I think it could be extended to Queens Village via. Horace Harding and Bell Blvd, followed by Union Tpke and Springfield Blvd. to give riders a faster and less crowded trip to Flushing, and it could relieve some more crowding on the Q27 without passing through QCC, which is a place that could aggravate some passengers.

You should have it operate on Linden Place and go to Union St. via the current Q34 route going to 149th Street if you're going to discontinue the Q34. I kind of think that the Q20B should cover both the Q74 route to Kew Gardens via. Vleigh Pl. and around Queens College, and the Q14 route to 7th Avenue, and the Q15A should be discontinued.

Actually, I often see the Q34 to be completely full, like the other routes on Kissena. Even after the Flushing-Main Street Station, going to Whitestone, it has a pretty fair amount of passengers. Adding service to the Q17 and Q27 would cause clumping overload all over the place. They are frequent enough.

I would not like the Q17 to operate on Main Street, because Main Street is quite a headache, which would slow down all Q17's- possibly even worse than Kissena Blvd. The Q44 and Q20 are sufficient enough. Also, eliminating Kissena Blvd service would decrease ridership on the Q17, which would make me happier, but that, with the elimination of the Q34, would cause the Q25 to be filled to the brim with riders, unless there was more service added to that line, which would cause extreme bunching. By the way, I don't think there should be limited service to Flushing on the Q17 during P.M. rush hours, like the Q27, because that is, weirdly, one of the only times the 17 is almost empty, even on Kissena.

I am aware that a lot of Q17s terminate at 188 and HHE on weekdays, but I'm talking about having northbound 17s terminate at Kissena Blvd. and HHE. Also, I don't agree with placing the 65 on 46th and Parsons, because ridership is stellar just the way it is, and 45th and Bowne are less congested than 46th and Parsons, respectively, and the Q65 would copy the unpopular Q26. I somewhat believe that the Q27 should go on Parsons instead of Kissena, because there is slightly less traffic, and that Holly Ave. gets a bit narrow, but that would kill ridership.

I think Q25 local service should be discontinued during peak-directional rush hours, or even throughout the day, so Kissena Blvd and Parsons Blvd. would be somewhat less congested. There should be more Q34 service during those hours, too. However, the real problem is the Q17 and Q27, which clump like crazy. There should really be better management with these two lines, like having some Q17s terminating at Queens College and some Q27s terminate at Flushing Hospital during rush hours, because running five lines, including the Q65, on a narrow-ish, traffic-filled street is quite a pain in the butt, literally. However, I occasionally see four Q17s back-to-back on 188th Street on Saturdays, and none of the buses have many passengers. This nonsense has got to stop.

LoL. I apologize for my rudeness. I'm just a selfish person who wants Q64 service in Fresh Meadows. Don't mind me.

Hell no.

Hey. On the new Queens Bus Map, it shows the Q65 returning back to its old route- running on 111th Street and 14th Avenue. Why is it like this?

Yes, I think it would be beneficial to have some weekday service to QCC for the Q64 and the Q30. A lot of people go to QCC or Cardozo via. the Q30 and either walk the rest of the way or take the 27. The Q30 should go to QCC during weekdays, except for late nights and early mornings, stopping at 58th Avenue and QCC, making a loop, and going back to HHE to continue its route. The Q64 should also have some weekday service terminating at QCC via. Springfield Blvd. I had this idea of the 64 going to the Douglaston LIRR station via. 69th/73rd Ave., 230th St, 67th Ave, 233rd st, W. Alley Rd, and Douglastion Pkwy to cover Oakland Gardens, and serve the residents of Douglaston, but I'm not sure if that would work. EDITED: However, I don't think the Q88 should stay the way it is if it's extended via. the Q38 route, because it would be a heck of a long route.

If you're going to argue, please support your argument. How will the 38 get to Flushing?

If the Q88 gets sent to Middle Village or Ridgewood, it should terminate at 73rd Avenue and 188th Street. Extend the Q64 to Queens Village via. 73rd Avenue and Springfield Blvd. for the rest of the 88's service. Another option is having it terminate at Jewel Ave. and 164th St, but that would anger many QCM goers, including me.

Eww. No.

Hay. No cursing, and there could be additional service between Middle Village and Rego Park on weekends for the Q67, if not the entire route.

Kay. I understand now, but I still think the Q26 should be extended in some way. I would be ecstatic if it was extended to 188th Street, but that would never happen.

How about... extending the Q26 to Bellerose? I know this would be very controversial, but the Q1 can be discontinued, and the Q43 and the Q36 can have local service during rush hours, and the Q27/Q88 and Q26 can replace the Queens Village and the Bellerose branches, respectively. Besides, the Q36 covers all three of the Q1's terminals, and the 36 and 43 are both PACKED during peak-directional rush hours, so more service could relieve all that passenger traffic. Going to Bellerose, the Q26 can turn left on HHE, turn right on Bell Blvd, turn left on Union Tpke, turn right on Springfield Blvd, and merge onto Braddock Avenue to Jericho Tpke. Just a thought, as always.

I think the Q26 and the Q64 should be one route. (LOL JK JK)

The Q64 can terminate at 64th Avenue, 188th Street via the HHE from 164th Street, so it could terminate at the street it was named after. But I think I'm being selfish because that's close to my home.

How about extending the Q64 to Peck Park via. 73rd Avenue and 188th Street? We, residents of Fresh Meadows demand a direct service to Forest Hills. It could save people more than 10 minutes on their commute to work compared to going to Jamaica and taking the F train or going the Elmhurst and taking the M/R trains, and not many people like taking the 7 train. Just a thought.