vioreen

MTA did try to close down 145 along the line but the community protested, if the community protested, the MTA needs to turn 145 street into a full length platform.

As 145th street on the 3 line was renovated, why the renovation plan did NOT include an expansion of the platforms in order for 145st street to accommodated a full length train ?

I noticed it today ans its interesting

The U-shape platforms in Flatbush Avenue–Brooklyn College (2/5 line) station needs to be replaced with an Island Platform.

I'd recently saw the r160 operating on the G line, how come?

There maybe one

I if I was in charge of NYCT, this is how the R143/160/211 are going to be assigned to each B division line (assuming the R32/R46 already retired). R179/R211 some R211(the line would still maintain its R68/a fleet) R179/R211 someR211 (the line would still maintain its R68/a fleet) R160 R160/211 R211 R160a / R179 R143/R160 R143/R160 R160 R160/R179 R160/ R211 (Franklin) R211 (Rockaway Parkway) R211 R160 R160/ R179 *also the R211 would replace some R68/a.

Interesting though! even the newly r179 is having a similar issue like that

Maybe its possible that another swap could happen as a result of the R211 delivery.

Why the R142/a R143, R188 didn't have a FIND display system like the R160 and R179 ? and should the MTA replace those strip maps with a FIND system ?

I think the R46/R160 swap would not last long because the R211 which is expected to be delivered by end of 2020 will start replacing the R46. When the R211 is delivered which line would it run on ?

Should the MTA make the weekend M train to 96 street permanent ?

Why majority of the R46s replaced the R160s on the N,Q,W lines ? could there be a better solution to this idea ?

Why majority of the R46s replaced the R160s on the N,Q,W lines ? could there be a better solution to this idea ?

Not express, but local

If the pilot program for the express line failed, some trains terminate at Burnside Avenue during rush hours and get taken out of service, instead maybe some Manhattan bound trains can originate there trip from Burnside Avenue while, some can originate from Woodlawn. Since stops that are south of Burnside Avenue have a higher ridership than stops north of Burnside Avenue that way it can alleviate train congestion on the line during rush hours.

There has to be changes on the 4 line. The MTA should restore the rush hour express 4 train in order to alleviate congestion.

Maybe they should restore the V train but to 96 street second avenue and the M train can go back to its old previous service back to bay parkway