Q43LTD
-
Posts
7,501 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Q43LTD
-
I wonder would the B53 still exist under this plan
-
Kind of scares me what will the B55 say if it goes through
-
There's a reason why the is being split. Same with the
-
Now that 63 and 80 combo from the previous draft isn't such a bad idea after all. I guess I was afraid of 80 St losing access to Queens Center.
-
That McDonald signage brings me back to the PBL days. Like when the Q8 just said Euclid like it's a neighborhood. I'm not too fond of these corner destinations. It should be neighborhood, street then via whatever. The Q41 is a bit excessive now. LIB I had an issue with too.
-
Some random thoughts about this Queens redesign: The Q9 is proposed to be extended south to 135 Av. I find that funny since its ex GBL brethren have Rockaway Blvd as a short turn, not a full time terminal. Most notably the Q6 and 10. The Q37 being extended to JFK is kind of similar as if the Q77 were extended to JFK. 2 options from Queens Blvd, 2 options from Jamaica Terminal
-
The Q73 idea was pretty much a handful of ideas that I liked from the other draft.
-
I'm actually surprised the 23 to LGA was not considered in these redesigns
-
There's those 23 to LaGuardia discussions that will come up. Take the 48 out
-
That area still has direct access to Forest Hills
-
It's to have a bus route serving all of 108 St between Forest Hills and East Elmhurst.
-
I would have left that for the 63, instead of it being a supplement to the 66. I believe there was talk back on RD that the 66 should be a LTD or have articulated buses. The thing that got me was it was proposed to run 24/7
-
This is a similar setup when the was Triboro
-
It's priorities and this hypocrisy. The narcissism and the entitlement mentality.
-
It's safe to say the B103 has come a long way since the Command days. It was an intra borough limited, then a certain former member got upset when it became "just another" LTD
-
Those definitely need to be in a dumpster fire
-
What's funny is the Q16 was supposed to end at the current 31 terminal and the Francis Lewis and Utopia branches got their own number in the previous draft.
-
I mean there are some ideas from the first 2 drafts that I liked that could have made the final cut. Mostly from the second draft and probably one from the first draft.
-
What if the Bronx redesign had a Rush style redesign?
Q43LTD replied to MysteriousBtrain's topic in New York City Bus
I have a feeling may not do the same for Manhattan or Staten Island. This whole rush, LTD, local and SBS/crosstown bit -
Overall, I'm half disappointed, half relieved at this proposed final plan.
-
The Q112 to Broadway Junction is similar to my B10 to Cypress Hills in the Brooklyn Redesign thread. (Why the B12 needed a LTD variant is beyond me) I would only do it for ADA and when the goes express between Euclid and Broadway Junction.
-
Maybe Broadway Junction would be better for the Q112 then?
-
I looked at the map wrong. In the 1st draft, the Q37 no longer served the Casino. In the second one, it was modified in South Ozone Park for the umpteenth time. In this final one, it's supposed to go to JFK with another modification in South Ozone Park. I'm starting to agree now. Perhaps the B14 would be better taking that Pitkin segment to Ozone Park. Don't know what the turnaround would be though
-
So, in your case, Union Tpke would get the Brewer treatment in a way: Q45- Kew Gardens-Springfield Blvd Q46- Kew Gardens-LIJ Q48- Kew Gardens-Glen Oaks
-
I thought it was Fresh Pond until 2008, when Grand Avenue was formed