Jump to content

GojiMet86

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    9,995
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Posts posted by GojiMet86

  1. 10 hours ago, xD4nn said:

    This article is complete bullshit. The author does not know what he is talking about and lack zero knowledge of railroad operations. The people he interviewed also do not know anything about how railroad ops work and have been eurobrained to the max. This article is completely false. 

     

    3 hours ago, FLX9304 said:

    Thank you. That’s why I don’t post from ppl who don’t know their rails from the top of their heads. I want to hear it from the experts. 

    Alon doesn't pull that information out of his ass. Time savings from EMU acceleration and deacceleration vs. Diesel performance has been studied thoroughly.

    Has it crossed your minds that maybe American railroad experts aren't as great as as Japanese or European railroad experts?...

     

     

  2. https://media.amtrak.com/introducing-amtrak-airo/

    Quote

     

    INTRODUCING AMTRAK AIRO

    Offering a more sustainable way to travel and featuring a modern design with world-class amenities, Amtrak Airo will transform the travel experience. The new trains will elevate the journey with a focus on comfort and efficiency, providing even more advantages to traveling by rail.

    The new trains will start debuting in 2026 and operate on routes throughout the country.Routes include the:

    Amtrak Northeast Regional, Empire Service, Virginia Services, Keystone Service, Downeaster, Cascades, Maple Leaf, New Haven/Springfield Service, Palmetto, Carolinian, Pennsylvanian, Vermonter, Ethan Allen Express and Adirondack.

    THIS is the future of Amtrak.

    Key Features

    • Elevated Experience: With its modern, spacious interior and panoramic windows, customers have an improved view of the best sights in the country while connecting to the passing landscape.
    • A Greener Impact: The new trains are more fuel efficient and produce 90% less particulate emissions in diesel operations.
    • Reduced Travel Times: The new trains will operate at speeds up to 125 mph and offer near seamless transition between power sources where time-consuming locomotive changes were previously required.
    • Redesigned Café Car: More contemporary food service provides self-service options.
    • Wayfinding: Signage creates a cleaner, more evident and accessible way to identify and differentiate cabins – both on the exterior and interior through a color-coded system.
    • Spacious Seating:Each spacious seat prioritizes ergonomics, offers enhanced comfort with plenty of legroom, bigger and sturdier tray tables, moveable headrests and a dedicated cup and seatback tablet-holder.
    • Business Class: Choice of double and single seats offer customers greater flexibility.
    • Amenities: Features enhanced lighting, improved technology with digital customer information systems and touchless restroom controls, dedicated individual outlets, USB ports and onboard Wi-Fi.

     

     

    220929_TRICON_AmtrakICT_Exterior_NEC_UPD

    220929_Amtrak_ICT_Lake_UPDATE.jpg

    220929_TRICON_AmtrakICT_Coach_Seating_1_

    220919_TRICON_AmtrakICT_Business_Seating

  3. Delays

    (N) (R)trains are running with delays in both directions after multiple incidents along the line.

    What Happened?

    Emergency teams responded to someone struck by a train at 59 St (Brooklyn)

    We moved a train that had it's emergency brake cord pulled near 39 Av (Queens)

    We addressed a mechanical problem on a train at 23 St (Manhattan).

    EMS responded to a passenger in need of medical assistance at Atlantic Av-Barclays Ctr

    Posted: 12/12/2022 10:38PM

  4. The (A)(C)(E) are in a bit of a sh*tshow right now.

    There was both a track fire and a train with mechanical problems at Chambers Street, along with a train with emergency brakes activated for a person who needed medical help at West 4th Street (that is what is written).

    MTA just says avoid these lines.

  5. 39 minutes ago, JLiu15 said:

    Update on these buses:

    Their numbers will be 26002-26018, not 26001-26017. 26002 is still in training but will be in service this month. 26003-26009 will be delivered by the end of the year, while the remainder are still on the line.

    26002-26015 will each feature a unique Princeton scheme while the remainder will be in the standard Tiger Transit scheme. 

    26002 plate: OYB6484 VIN: 5FYB8KJ02NC105964

    So what is 26001? Ugh, it messes with my OCD, lol!

  6. 9 hours ago, JLiu15 said:

    https://www.masstransitmag.com/management/article/21285284/transdev-to-acquire-first-transit

    It looks like Transdev will be acquiring First Transit. For those who may not know, they were already purchased by EQT about a year ago. This is the second time they've been sold in the past two years.

    It will be interesting to see how it plays out. Will all First Transit operations and vehicles be transferred to Transdev, or will First Transit still operate in name, just that it's owned by Transdev (like it is now with First being owned by EQT). I'm mostly curious about what it means for university transit systems as they operate plenty of them (e.g. Rutgers, Emory, LSU, GSU, SCAD, UTK, Alabama, etc), mostly using ElDorado Axess/EZ Rider.

    That's gonna be a hell of a transit and shuttle operator behemoth.

    First Transit is also very big in the UK (it started out as Badgerline in the city of Bristol); this is the French taking over the English.

  7. If you're doing this from a computer, don't copy the url of post; rather copy the url of the image. Go directly over the image, right click the image, and click on "Copy image address". Then paste that.

    So instead of thisurl :

    imgur.com/vEtWI3n

     

    You end with a url that looks like this:

    https://i.imgur.com/vEtWI3n.jpeg

     

    When you copy it and paste it directly here, it should automatically convert it into the photo:

     

    vEtWI3n.jpeg

  8. 3 minutes ago, ttcsubwayfan said:

    Hey guys! It's been 8 years since I last went to New York, but it's in the cards for me to do so again. To that end I was wondering if there are any locals that would be able to help me with selecting some best spots for photography.

    I am looking for recommendations for the best stations on the B/Q and D in south Brooklyn for photos of R46/68/68A cars. Ideally quieter stations but not ones that are the sketchy. I am especially wondering about Prospect Park as that would be a good location to get R68 and A shots in one spot.

    I am also looking to find stations in downtown or midtown Manhattan that have sufficient space out at the end of the platform to snap acceptable stationary shots of trains on the 1/2/3, 4/5/6, B/D/F/M. I am wondering if anyone has any specific recommendations.

    Thank you in advance to anyone who can assist!

    West 8th Street, Sheepshead Bay, Kings Highway, and Beverley Road are also pretty good stations on the Brighton.

    On the West End, 9th Avenue is a must. 18th Avenue is pretty good, although I fan the Brighton way more, so I can't speak for other West End stops.

    34th Street-Herald Square has enough space on specific ends.

    It gets harder with the 1/2/3/4/5/6 because the platforms are almost exactly the same length as the trains. I do think South Ferry has decent space.

  9. 3 hours ago, Lex said:

    I was going to have a long post about skip-stop service, but all I will say is that I have a hard time imagining the MTA will try to maintain it for too much longer. Hell, the fact that all trains stop at Alabama Avenue -- one of the weakest stations -- is, to me, a sign that skip-stop subway service in NYC is not long for this world.

    Anyway, I think that's enough about that. I'd argue we're beginning to derail the thread.

    I heard Alabama had been added for the workers at ENY Yard and the depot.

  10.  

    52366706665_c1a22fd64a_c.jpgIMG_2607 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52365002011_3f0220daac_c.jpgIMG_2590 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52370717840_7dc4bed45d_c.jpgIMG_2636 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52370300226_3328acaf86_c.jpgIMG_2638 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52374191095_d4ee429ce4_c.jpgIMG_2679 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52366510768_46d04dab37_c.jpgIMG_2598 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52371545919_4555daacbc_c.jpgIMG_2642 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52366281636_f59e574b5b_c.jpgIMG_2596 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52370528933_966e210f24_c.jpgIMG_2626 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52371545734_fa86130a28_c.jpgIMG_2653 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52371238236_6a1ff3fc9b_c.jpgIMG_2662 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

     

    52376543270_a4b8c38b1f_c.jpgIMG_2692 by GojiMet86, on Flickr

  11. 15 minutes ago, ABOGbrooklyn said:

    I mean is aren't these the same buses that the coach bus companies use. Don't the side of the bus open for luggages?

    Luggage bays are opened at stations, so the bay doors are not sticking out on the road, which would be disastrous. Racks on the sides of a moving bus would be a dangerous animal.

  12. 1 hour ago, trainfan22 said:

    Was nice to ride an R46 via the 6th Ave express. Unfortunately the train stalled out at 42nd - Bryant Park and they are investigating what's wrong with the train right now.

    ....train just got removed from service. I hope they announce what's wrong with the train, as someone intrested in mechanical inner workings of trains this stuff intrigues me lol.

    Train took power, moved a couple feet then stopped.

    I was on the (Q) behind, they sent us local.

  13. 3 hours ago, 7-express said:

    FYI, bus 1333 operating as the 1545 QM2 trip to Bay Terrace wasn't showing up on BusTime while in Manhattan.  It only showed up again once it entered Queens.  Not sure if this is a bad GPS or it was having a bad signal in Manhattan.  Just thought I'd note it here.

    Happens a lot when they cross the Queensboro bridge. I've seen it with the Q101 and Q32.

  14. 7 minutes ago, N6 Limited said:

    The point is that it’s a money grab. If no one sped then they’d lower the speed limit even more to generate revenue, then cry about “congestion” and “decreased bus speeds”.

    It's not much of a money grab of this is rarely enforced though, is it? It's actually not as enforced as it should be. When the speed limit was higher (before Vision Zero), many people were still speeding, and enforcement was just as lax.

    When the first bus lanes came into service, people said the same thing the city using them as money grabs. Fast forward to today, and enforcement is nonexistent and buses still struggle, especially along 125th Street. Not much of a cash grab there. All this fuss about nothing.

    Almost like someone has driver's backs within DOT......

     

    7 minutes ago, N6 Limited said:

    I-287 the one interstate from Staten Island to the Bronx that connects all 5 Boroughs, works as a Manhattan bypass and as a collector/distributor to most the Bridges and Tunnels to Manhattan, it also connects to the Long Island Expressway which is the main and only east-west expressway across Queens and Nassau (Suffolk has Sunrise Highway), etc.

    The Bushwick and Cross-Brooklyn Expressways were not built and so the BQE gets traffic that would have used those highways as well.

    Imagine building these highways in the 1960s and 1970s through low-income East New York, Williamsburg, and Maspeth. Yes, let's bulldoze hundreds and hundreds of apartment buildings, houses, and homes. That would have destroyed these neighborhoods.

    Each time these highway genuises built them, the excuse was always that they would reduce congestion. Years later, each of those highways became saturated, and traffic was brought to standstill. Then these geniuses would justify the construction of more highways because of that congestion. And this pattern repeated.

    I guarantee that these unbuilt expressways would have been as congested as the BQE is today. Then what would have been the excuse?

    6 minutes ago, Via Garibaldi 8 said:

    Increased congestion on the BQE is actually related to the congestion in the CBDs, at least during the pandemic anyway, as people that used to take public transportation have been driving into Manhattan. They have been the ones clogging up the HOV lane as well. Those that are anti-car and see no issue with the poor service the (MTA) has been providing will make blanket statements that Congestion Pricing is good because it gets cars off of the road, without saying anything about the need to hold the (MTA) accountable for running service that incentivizes transit use. I support Congestion Pricing in theory, but this plan in particular I don't support, not unless it involves major changes, particularly for people that drive because they have crap transit options. That means things like better transit late hours and off-peak, since this plan would be in place 24/7.

    I'm on board with this, although I am not very optimistic with the whole idea that a majority car drivers would take transit if only transit was better. Realistically, it would be marginal.

    I already see people complaining about having too many big bulky buses on the road. That is legit something I have heard from drivers I've been with. "If only there weren't that many buses on the road, we would have more space".

  15. 26 minutes ago, B35 via Church said:

    What's not making sense in this discussion is this pitting/comparing of congestion on the BQE, compared to that of congestion in Manhattan....

    Let's run with this assertion that congestion on the BQE is worse.... It still does not mean that congestion isn't a significant issue in (either of) Manhattan's CBD's.... It's not some shutdown counterargument....

    One thing I'm going to make clear is that I'm not in support of congestion pricing, so the contrary isn't my reason for saying any of this... I'm saying this because that argument doesn't amount to much of anything in the grand scheme of things... As was said, congestion's bad all throughout this city.... So what is really with this na na na boo boo shit?

    "So my point is really the congestion on the BQE is worse than in Manhattan where they will be charging because traffic is supposedly so bad there."

    He thinks the city is lying through its teeth about CBD congestion, that's what I have a problem with. I walk around Midtown and stand on the corners to observe too often to just simply ignore that part. My man cherry-picks too much.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.