Jump to content
Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.

New Bus numbering sequence


Recommended Posts

I guess they got to change the numbers on the already here 4330.....

 

But man, this whole thing is a mess now. MTA's logic is somewhere else sometimes. I can understand 3800, but they shouldn't have. I forgot the numbers that could fit all the buses, its somewhere. but Trevor Logan did a good breakdown on Buschat about whats available and what should be renumbered.

http://www.subchat.com/buschat/read.asp?Id=101608

Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess they got to change the numbers on the already here 4330.....

 

But man, this whole thing is a mess now. MTA's logic is somewhere else sometimes. I can understand 3800, but they shouldn't have. I forgot the numbers that could fit all the buses, its somewhere. but Trevor Logan did a good breakdown on Buschat about whats available and what should be renumbered.

http://www.subchat.com/buschat/read.asp?Id=101608

 

 

Well...... As you can see thats my most least (is that a double negative? lol) descriptive post in months because i'm just totally lost. But if you think about it, throughout history MTA has merged and renumbered 10,000 buses. Trevors post makes more than perfect sence, but this is one area of MTA that I will never understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well...... As you can see thats my most least (is that a double negative? lol) descriptive post in months because i'm just totally lost. But if you think about it, throughout history MTA has merged and renumbered 10,000 buses. Trevors post makes more than perfect sence, but this is one area of MTA that I will never understand.

Your not the only one....

 

When has anything ever made sense with the MTA!

Link to post
Share on other sites
IMO, 7423-7428 should be renumbered to 3475-3480 and 5894-5897 should be renumbered to 3481-3484.

What I don't understand is why didn't the NG order start at 3784 instead of 3800?

 

I agree. The artics are going to run into those numbers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.