-
Posts
1,647 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by FLX9304
-
-
They say that the 30 testing for R211Ts will come on late 2023. You can’t always go with what is say. Problems may occur along the way and everything gets push back a month at 2
0 -
On 12/2/2023 at 4:40 PM, Lawrence St said:
Apparently the R1/9's got taken out of service because of vandalism or brake issues...can't get verification as to which one.
You have to know which one since you was on that train
1 -
On 11/25/2023 at 9:46 PM, Lawrence St said:
Why is Broadway lines in red? Lol
That’s the GOP endorsed New York Post for you.
0 -
On 11/23/2023 at 1:17 PM, GreatOne2k said:
This is a Times Square bound Zero train. The next & last stop is Times Square. Stand clear of the closing doors!
1 -
2 minutes ago, MTAFoamer said:
Yes, Queens will be full Nova Bus in the future
Not ALL Queens Depots will be full NovaBus
2 -
15 hours ago, 4P3607 said:
As of November 27th (the last time I observed the A line)
1. 4060-4069 (Pilot Set)
2. 4130-4139
3. 4110-4114+4129-4125 (First Production Set to return)
4. 4100-4104+4120-4124 (Second Production Set to return)
Have not observed any new sets burn-in testing.
While I am unable to confirm the status of the R-211T it seems quite implicative that it will run in service very soon. I was told that this month was when it was supposed to debut but so far there is no further word and the month is almost over.
It’ll probably be your Christmas present
0 -
5 hours ago, Ale188 said:
So, ig they take em to CIY to get their issues fixed...got it. This set might be next in line for service
CI should have inspected the gear boxes WAAAAY before sending the R211s over to Pitkin Yard for training and revenue operations. If not then they wouldn’t have this problem right now. The only problem I see in today’s era is human errors. (Stop looking at your phone when in class. Your safety is more important than your electronic device).
0 -
15 hours ago, MTA Researcher said:
Astoria - CI: Broadway/4 Av Exp via Sea Beach
71 Av - 95 St: QBL Lcl via 60th - Broadway/4 Av Exp stopping at 45 and 53 Sts via vanshookenragen’s proposed switches. would go via Manhattan Bridge.
96 St/2 Av - CI: Broadway/4 Av Lcl via Montague St/West End
In here Queens Bound trains go Broadway Express, 2 Av Trains via Broadway Local. This can be done via 57 St/7 Av Flip. Queens needs more Manhattan/Brooklyn Express service. That’s coming from one who dwells in Queens.
71 Av - Brighton Beach: QBL Lcl via 63rd - 6 Av/Brighton Exp
If you haven’t noticed; 4 Av now has full coverage.
And please explain how am I wasting money having 2 trains branch out north? Doesn’t the do that in Queens? Doesn’t the do that in The Bronx ?
The is one way during peak hours for trains heading directly to the 239th St Yard. And there are only 5 trips up WPR. The during the peak hour is more frequent than the . So that’s why they had that since the 1960s.
the is actually 2 train lines of old. The was actually the Rockaways Line, and it still is.
1 -
1 hour ago, MTA Researcher said:
In other words 50 St becomes an express stop?
So it wouldn’t be possible to run together via 8 Av/ Fulton St Exp, with to Lefferts and to Rockaways? Not even have go 8 Av Exp with to Lefferts or Rockaways via Fulton St Exp and to Euclid via Fulton St Lcl?
I assume both in either proposal would have to exceed 26 TPH… I can see 15 TPH 15 TPH, a total of 30 TPH…
Not quite, would go to 205, absorbing the , would become the current uptown-wise. Regarding CPW-Broadway connection… well then if it can’t be done; can we add more trains? Thus CPW would go as follows;
unchanged
205 -CI: Concourse/CPW/6 Av Exp - Brighton Lcl
BPB/168 - WTC: All local (24 TPH - 10 going to 168 14 to the Bronx)
Discontinued
If you’re gonna discontinue the , what line are you’re gonna run on the 4th Ave line? That’s something you gotta think about. You can’t have 2 s operating from 2 different branches. You’re wasting money by doing that.
0 -
10 hours ago, aemoreira81 said:
I forgot about that.` The ones transferred to CHS never got re-labeled. I'm not sure they ever tracked with Charleston on MyMTA or TransSee.
The latter one. MyMTA didn’t have that system until 2014, but I do believe other transit apps had dem for a while.
0 -
No more (D40LFs) 8000s in Frontier, the 82xx & 83xx in Frontier are being replaced as well by the NFXDE40s with BAEs. Plus they got 5 XDEs from Comly and 5 from Midvale.
0 -
-
3 hours ago, Vulturious said:
Let's also not forget the R143 strip maps changing from only the route and stations to including that along with the / route and stations.
They were also used on the OPTO Route as well from 2001-2007 until the first R160As were assigned to the & line
0 -
20 hours ago, Chris89292 said:
Finally, all though the mta should’ve studied such features years before the 211’s entered service, it’s kinda too late to introduce such feature “Again”
They can still do that at any time they wish. They can even do that on older NTTs. When R142s 6301-7080 was assigned to the & , they had separated strip maps. Now 6301-7130 have the combined & strip maps. On the R160s they introduced electronic ads and yellow poles. Now ALL NTT cars have them. R(142A) 188s introduced ⭕️ and ♦️ in green & red, matching those on the R62As. They’re found in cars 7501-7505+7506-(7927)-7510
0 -
Update: No 8000s in Southern
3613-3619 delivered to Frontier
0 -
On 11/2/2023 at 6:12 PM, Chris89292 said:
there’s a video on YouTube showing a bunch of kids playing around with the lights on an R46, Normal passengers can’t even enjoy a peaceful ride
To elaborate on this, this video was shown to the police by someone in transit. These conquestors (I don’t call them kids) love to disrupt service. The same dude at the end was the one who vandalized the R46 Broadway line.
0 -
6 hours ago, Kamen Rider said:
4060/69 never stopped running, so you could have just as easily heard that.
Smoky conditions which is a track fire.
0 -
15 hours ago, Calvin said:
It's said that ridership is at pre-pandemic level, but the respect to others hasn't changed. For now, there's courtesy campaigns on their digital ads.
I need better results from 2, 4, 7 or 11. These ppl on channel 5 act like “L & O” but this isn’t China or Russia. They can’t control 8,000,000 ppl in NYC and 1/2 take public transportation.
0 -
50 minutes ago, R68ACTrain said:
A good portion of their signals are brand new... as in less than 5 years old
And their signal lights are CBTC ready unless they have that yellow sign blockage at the end of each station for CBTC/ATO warnings
0 -
1 hour ago, 1998NewFlyer said:
I definitely agree, the A and F need the R211T's
The once the Culver line becomes CBTC, and IF you can get good views of it. Cause in a few years, subway elevated viewing will only be seen by drones
the , consider that done!
0 -
5 hours ago, ABOGbrooklyn said:
So the r211 issue was resolved?
yes
testing on lines does not mean that the car is gonna see revenue service on that particular line.
after what happened to the R46s on the Broadway line being vandalized a few weeks ago, they’re not putting newer cars until they see fit0 -
39 minutes ago, NewFlyer 230 said:
8977 has only been in service for two days and someone has already tagged it up a little.
Welcome back to 1977!!!
0 -
4 hours ago, darkstar8983 said:
They probably want to make sure its cleared to run anywhere in case of reroutes, or assignments in the year 2080
2080? None of us will be around to see that
0 -
4 hours ago, Ale188 said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Er1ePU8tefu
4179 and 4177 are seen built
The video that was posted about those 2 R211 cars that was being built or sent is no longer available due to the copyrighted content without authorization to do so. You must have legitimate video from said poster in order for you to share it.
0
SUBWAY - Random Thoughts Topic
in New York City Subway
Posted
You should know when Holiday, special occasions and newbies come, you’re gonna get “conquestors” on these trips. Their task is this: vandalize to ruin service by causing delays.