Jump to content


Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.

rbrome

Senior Member
  • Content Count

    237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

210 Excellent

1 Follower

About rbrome

  • Rank
    Poster

Profile Information

  • Location
    New York, NY

Recent Profile Visitors

1,003 profile views
  1. Why are people so concerned about signals on this line? If it's going to be simplified to basically just two tracks, each with one train going back and forth, with no chance of any trains ever even sharing any track in normal operation, (unless I have the proposal wildly wrong?!)) what exactly is the benefit of CBTC or UWB? I mean this line barely needs any signals at all. It should absolutely be automated, but advanced (read: expensive) signal tech seems completely unnecessary.
  2. OK, sorry. I looked back quite a bit and couldn't find that. Thanks.
  3. The R211 are a good starting point in terms of wider doors and more digital signs inside. So start with that. Hi-res, full-color LED signs on exterior. This kind of tech (same as Times Square jumbo-trons) is actually pretty good and cheap now. No reason not to use it. LCDs aren't bright enough for exterior use. Exterior side displays mounted above or next to windows, instead of blocking the upper half of a window. Exterior-mounted sliding doors (Like JFK AirTrain, London Tube, etc.) allowing more interior space and much larger windows. Inside, keep the LED-based ceiling/end displays, but LCD strip maps (so much more useful info you can display) and LCD system maps, updated in real time to show both planned and unplanned service changes. Stainless steel inside and out. Clean and sleek. (None of this tacky blue outside and garish yellow inside.) Open gangways.
  4. No. It will work exactly like a single-ride Metrocard. You just tap your phone (or smartwatch, or contactless credit/debit card) instead of swiping.
  5. They are not yet enabled for the general public. At the end of May, they will be enabled so that anyone can use their own NFC-enabled phone (Apple Pay or Google Pay) or contactless debit/credit card. Full fare, though; no passes nor discounts. This is basically just a trial phase of the trickiest part of the technology. Only in late 2020, once the readers are system-wide, will they roll out OMNY cards for the public. Until then, MetroCard remains the primary fare product.
  6. I've noticed that instead of the black/blue "TEST PHASE ... COMING SOON" screen, some readers now display a yellow "METROCARD ONLY" screen, with an icon for a traditional mag-stripe MetroCard. Nothing happens when you try to use these readers; the tap function seems to be turned off completely. ...whereas the ones that say "TEST PHASE ... COMING SOON" do seem to be enabled for certain kinds of internal testing. When I try my phone it does respond, but it doesn't work. I get this error message:
  7. Personally, I hate it. I think it looks visually... messy. One navy or yellow stripe could look nice, but both is too much. It looks tacky to me. Stainless steel looks sleeker to my eye. It's even worse on the inside. All the blue and bright yellow on the inside of the public R211 mock-up gave me a headache. I'd much prefer white and stainless; it looks far cleaner, brighter, and more relaxing. Also, stainless doesn't need to be repainted every few years. I suspect these stripes are going to look like garbage 10 years in. MTA will probably realize that paint is more trouble than its's worth and go back to stainless, like SEPTA did recently with its BSL (orange line subway) cars.
  8. They're rolling this out pretty quickly already. They seem to be putting one reader at one turnstile per entrance. Blank plates are already being replaced with lit-up tap screens at places like Fulton St.
  9. This really bugs me. The windows keep getting smaller. Why? There's enough above-ground trackage that customers certainly would appreciate a little light and a view. The MTA should care. Wy can't we have modern plug-style doors that allow double the windows, instead of huge, opaque door pockets?
  10. Yep: https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-metro-r179-mta-train-car-20190108-story.html
  11. Yes! Thank you. If homeless people prevent open-gangway trains, (a premise I don't accept, but just for argument's sake,) then the way forward is addressing the homeless people problem, not giving up on a vastly better train design that adds necessary capacity. It's amazing to me how often New York (and American) exceptionalism is expressed as a defeatist attitude. Come on. We can do better.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.