Jump to content
Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.
Sign in to follow this  
R10 2952

Why did they choose to Preserve R-38s 4140-4141 over 4028-4029?

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know why they've swapped R38s 4028-4029 with 4140-4141?

According to the Datasheet, It is no longer 4028-29 that are going to be preserved for the Transit Museum, but 4140-41 instead. What exactly caused this unexpected change in plans? All I hope is that they're going to end up preserving at least ONE set of R-38s for the Museum..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most likely 4140-4141 will run on Rail-Fan Trips while 4028-4029 will be in the Transit Museam, B)!

 

Why preserve two sets of cars in house? One can do both jobs. It's not like there's a fan trip every day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some use is better than no use.

 

 

It's why I'm not really too sad to see cars retired. There is stil la chance you will run into them not in revenue service. The Redbirds are a perfect example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Besides, the R38s rarely break down or have any technical issues. The MTA should really fix up the roofs of these work train by perhaps replacing the roofs with the roofs of reefed R32 trains.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why preserve two sets of cars in house? One can do both jobs. It's not like there's a fan trip every day.

 

Look at the R1-R9s, and the Redbirds. Those are the answers to your question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Look at the R1-R9s, and the Redbirds. Those are the answers to your question.

 

BUT BUT the Arnines are generally different models, and so are the Redbirds. They may look the same, but they're several different contracts.

 

The thing is, they preserved one train worth each of those cars for a special reason. Preserving only four R38s makes no sense. Preserve them in bulk or singles/married pairs is what I'm saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BUT BUT the Arnines are generally different models, and so are the Redbirds. They may look the same, but they're several different contracts.

 

The thing is, they preserved one train worth each of those cars for a special reason. Preserving only four R38s makes no sense. Preserve them in bulk or singles/married pairs is what I'm saying.

 

Many/Most of the remaining Redbirds are WF R-33s, and more than 1 remaining example exists of each of the R1/R4/R6/R7/A/R9 classes. But yes, it would be a very good idea to preserve the R-38s as married pairs (like the R-26s, for example).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.