Jump to content

ttcsubwayfan

Veteran Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,646

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ttcsubwayfan

  1. ttcsubwayfan
    It could cause trouble for the Bowling Green though.
  2. ttcsubwayfan
    Just curious, will there exist any chance of me photographing a 62A train in October 2013? Should be pretty cool to ride a 62A through City Hall though.
  3. ttcsubwayfan
    Yes... the connector to the Broadway line. Most people think when you mention Montague anyway. And I heard somewhere that the Nassau connector was closed off after the brown M was discontinued, does anyone know if there is any truth in this?
  4. ttcsubwayfan
    Sadly, you are correct. Same with the 'why should the take old trains' bull.
  5. ttcsubwayfan
    Due to a lack of organization in the above scenario, I think a new one would be appropriate: A structural failure (with the el) at Queensborough Plaza has resulted in no trains being able to pass through the station. Reroute trains accordingly.
  6. ttcsubwayfan
    New route. This is not meant to be taken as a serious proposal, just having a bit of fun: (U) Nassau Street Local Coney Island - Jamaica Center via West End Runs at all times.
  7. ttcsubwayfan
    Just curious, how long will the R42 set be on the for? Until the R32s from the can be returned to 207th, I'm guessing?
  8. ttcsubwayfan
    If the MTA thinks them necessary, then it's safe to say that they are. +10
  9. ttcsubwayfan
    They absolutely are necessary. Flushing's signalling system is old and in need of replacement, and unfortunately the 62As can't be retrofitted with CBTC. Oh, and R32s have until 2017. R42s... who knows.
  10. ttcsubwayfan
    The 2/5 will NOT get the 62As. The NTTs are too valuable, not because some foamers like the automated announcements but because of the flexibility at Flatbush. The 4/6 dont need that flexibility.
  11. ttcsubwayfan
    Who cares! It's not that serious.
  12. ttcsubwayfan
    Which is a pretty big difference.
  13. ttcsubwayfan
    The 40/42 mismatched set was 4460-4665. Sucks that 4450/51 got flooded, though.
  14. ttcsubwayfan
    Is that the pair with 4450 in it? I thought they were keeping that around for school car purposes. http://www.nycsubway...erl/show?133404
  15. ttcsubwayfan
    By this, do you mean pairs that contain R40s? If so, that boggles my mind, as the Slants and Mods are so different.
  16. ttcsubwayfan
    Also, I heard that the R40/42 mismatched pair has been preserved - can anyone confirm or deny?
  17. ttcsubwayfan
    Just a question - were the stations included in the updated station packs resized? After being inactive with my fictional route for a while, I decided to get back into it and I discovered this monstrosity - all of the tracks have been misaligned:
  18. ttcsubwayfan
    Were all the R32s delivered in 1964, or did deliveries stretch into 1965, and possibly 1966?
  19. ttcsubwayfan
    Doesn't mean that the connector to Nassau has power, though.
  20. ttcsubwayfan
    Much obliged, thanks!
  21. ttcsubwayfan
    I see what you're saying. This is part of the reason I travel alone while fanning.
  22. ttcsubwayfan
    People actually do this? What on earth for? The best part of the train is the front, and you're not going to get a pic of that if you hold the doors.
  23. ttcsubwayfan

    The heating on Xcelsiors is excellent. I've ridden them to and from school every day this week and they are very warm.

  24. ttcsubwayfan
    I think he was referring to all the cars used on the line in recent history People complain about the like no tomorrow but I haven't heard bad things about the .
  25. ttcsubwayfan
    I didn't notice those...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept