Culver Posted June 25, 2013 Share #126 Posted June 25, 2013 Thats true sothe S79 wont have the lights Which means the [excrement passage] politicians and NIMBYs in Staten Island won. Whoopdi-doo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XcelsiorBoii4888 Posted June 25, 2013 Share #127 Posted June 25, 2013 Which means the [excrement passage] politicians and NIMBYs in Staten Island won. Whoopdi-doo. Lol. I really think the S79 shouldnt of had been SBS from the beginning. I mean it should of just been a S79 Limited...similar to the S93 Limited. Because it doesnt have off board fare payment, and its the only SBS route using rigids, (although the M34/A was just converted) Also since it didnt have off board fare payment, it shouldnt of got the lights, and MTA wouldnt of had this problem. And since the lights are being changed, only SBS routes with off board fare payment can have lights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo19 Posted June 25, 2013 Share #128 Posted June 25, 2013 Lol. I really think the S79 shouldnt of had been SBS from the beginning. I mean it should of just been a S79 Limited...similar to the S93 Limited. Because it doesnt have off board fare payment, and its the only SBS route using rigids, (although the M34/A was just converted) Also since it didnt have off board fare payment, it shouldnt of got the lights, and MTA wouldnt of had this problem. And since the lights are being changed, only SBS routes with off board fare payment can have lights. Yeah. This was the MTA's half assed limited for the route, because no one would have been in favor for a regular limited service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.