Jump to content
Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.

IRT Subway Car assignments for January 16th, 2003


Recommended Posts

(1)/(9): R-62A (5-car sets)

(2): R-142

(3): R-62A (5-car sets and singles)

(4): R-33ML, R-62 (5-car sets), R-142A

(5)<5>: R-33ML, R-142

(6)<6>: R-142A

(7)<7>: R-33WF, R-36WF, R-36ML, R-62A (5-car sets and singles)

 

The former Westchester (6)<6> R-62A's (with yellow stickers) were scattered around the (1)/(9), (3), and (7)<7>.

 

The R-33's have been off the (2) since August 2002. The R-26/28/29's have been off the (5)<5> (and out of service for good) since October 2002. The R-29's and R-36's have been off the (6)<6> since late 2001, I believe; the R-62A's stuck around on the (6)<6> until around the middle of the year, I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep, this is the only statement that's true. That's when most of the redbirds went off the (5)<5>.

 

(Some remained on the (5)<5>, until early 2003)

 

Lol yeah, because I remember vividly seeing a R142 on the 5 at Grand Central during the Labour Day weekend with my grandmother. I still recall that that was the first day I saw redesign of the maps to reflect on the restoration of 9 service.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lol yeah, because I remember vividly seeing a R142 on the 5 at Grand Central during the Labour Day weekend with my grandmother. I still recall that that was the first day I saw redesign of the maps to reflect on the restoration of 9 service.

 

 

Why the Redbirds have to go? :cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites
It is old, without air condition, probably over the limit fo years it should be in service and possibly hard to maintain since parts are scarce...

 

I personally would like it to stay but everyone has to let it go... I am sure all railfans would want it to stay (even though they say and act like they don't want it to stay)...

 

Same reason for the recent retirements (R-32, R-38, R-40, R-40M and R-42)...

 

What certain railfans have to understand is, that cars, like humans, age. And when a car ages to a certain extent, it would be much more cost efficient to have it replaced than to rehabilitated.

Link to post
Share on other sites
It is old, without air condition, probably over the limit fo years it should be in service and possibly hard to maintain since parts are scarce...

 

I personally would like it to stay but everyone has to let it go... I am sure all railfans would want it to stay (even though they say and act like they don't want it to stay)...

 

Same reason for the recent retirements (R-32, R-38, R-40, R-40M and R-42)...

 

They actually had air conditioning, except for the R33WF.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Certain cars had... Not all, ;)! I only caught an Air Conditioned Red Bird on the (6)... The (2), (4), (5) and (7) is all hot during summer and cold during winter... The (1) and (3), I never saw a RedBird, all R-62's, :)!

 

No, trust me, most Redbirds had A/C. Whether they were good or not (or even worked at all) is a different story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.