Jump to content

go25

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    847
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by go25

  1. 20 hours ago, davemackey said:

    Here's what has tracked so far: 21001-21004, 21006, 21010-21011, 21030, 21032 (tracking incorrectly as 20132), 21040-21041, 21047, 21049-21052 and 21057.  Nothing has been delivered yet. 21001 made it up to Winnipeg.

    NJT still maintains that this order is for 1104 coaches, and it appears that the last 33 buses will be delivered in the 2022 model year, by 2Q of that calendar year. NJT will still have hundreds of older cruisers - the 7100's, the 9000's, the 4000's and the 72-7300's. It's too early to tell if ridership will warrant the replacement of those buses.

    The 4000s? The somewhat new hybrids are to be replaced already?!

  2. 1 hour ago, DaTransitMan4608 said:

    It is, but that doesn't mean they should do it. If a line terminates near or at a garage, it doesn't necessarily mean it should belong to said garage. Especially in Orange's case given that the 88 has historically been a motorcoach line and they have no space to store any MCIs there.  

    Also, keep in mind that whether this line or any other DeCamp line ends up being taken over hinges on NJT getting the federal funding they have been asking for to keep them operating the way they are now. 

     

    Never implied that Hilton should do the route(s) whatsoever. Just pointing out the obvious answer lol. 

     

    I hope that DeCamp can pull through, hate to see another small business go away because of this pandemic. And if it does, can NJT handle all of this? That's up for debate...

  3. 10 hours ago, checkmatechamp13 said:

    So here is an idea for some Newark-area restructuring:

    #74 rerouted south of Passaic Bus Terminal to operate via Passaic Avenue-Van Houten Avenue-Route 21, and then follows the #76X route through Downtown Newark to reach Newark Broad Street & Newark Penn Station.

    #92 rerouted north of Bloomfield Center to take over the #72 route to Paterson (this serves two purposes: It allows riders from the Paterson-Bloomfield portion of the #72 to access the Morris & Essex Line, with all of the alternative crosstown routes that get you into Downtown Newark, there's no reason why someone would backtrack on the #92 from South Orange or Orange over to Forest Hill to catch the light rail).

    #96 extended up North 6th Street, Franklin Avenue, Belleville Avenue, and Broad Street to Bloomfield Center (covers the Belleville Avenue portion of the #92 and also provides access to Clara Maas Medical Center from the South and Central Wards).

    #90 extended to Passaic via the present-day #74 route.

    Still trying to figure out if there's a way to salvage the #74U. Maybe restructure it with the #13C (from Delawanna Avenue, make a left onto Main Avenue, a right onto Allwood Road, and then follow the #13 route to the end). 

    Here's my take: Not every route needs to serve Penn Station. The 74 gets its crowd by NOT going to Penn, rather helping out the, at times, overcrowded 72, with its terminus at Branch Brook Park.

    The 90 is a mess on it's own.

    The 96 is a  ghost route, to me that is. I would have to ride those routes again to have a general idea.

  4. 18 hours ago, dkm07302 said:

    I might have agreed to that a few years ago, but thinking now, I don't think it'll be useful. I mean, you have the #86, #1, and #6 that serves Lafayette Loop. I would maybe increase the #6 to liberty state park since that would be the best route to benefit that area. 

    To me, I would like to see the Red & Tan #11 and the Lafayette & Greenville IBOA #16 return. From Journal Square, there is no direct service to Newport Mall (unless you get the path) and no direct service to Liberty State Park. The #16 was always crowded because most of the people came from Monticello Avenue and McGinley Square. I remember a driver who use to work for the company and he said the route was great, but the company was doing poorly. As for the #11, I just can't believe that no bus route has served the park in years. It would have been a gold mine now (with this illness).

    If you take away what NJT did to the 1 and 86, in terms of serving segments where the 4 did, I'm sure it would work. After all, the 4 goes to downtown JC while the 6 goes to Journal Square.

    In terms of LSP, its asinine that the park has no direct bus service since the 11, 231, and 305 (to a very small extent) gotten the ax. I agree that the 6 should serve it more and help entice passengers to use the HBLR.

  5. Since I was thinking on how Jersey City's bus network has been ravaged by cuts especially the Lafayette/Greenville neighborhoods, what would you propose to bring back certain route(s) back?

     

    I was thinking about bringing back the 4 and assigning it to Greenville. The route would stay the same, serving Newport Mall from Merritt St and Ocean Ave, but added to it would be to take a page out of the 6 and serve Lafayette Loop (for people wanting to take the HBLR) on hourly trips on weekdays, and weekends would go like: Newport Mall via Ocean Ave & Lafayette Loop, and Merritt St. via Lafayette Loop & Ocean Ave full time.

    Thoughts?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.