Jump to content

LGA Link N Train

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    2,696
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LGA Link N Train

  1. Ah, this is a difficult one, but since I sent the to Laurelton then hopefully that would result in increased service in the LIRR Port Washington Branch
  2. yes. I just fixed the error, thanks. By the way whats more important. A northern Blvd Subway or the Queens Bypass?
  3. http://app.enmodal.co/?id=b0ea530ff5063095# Map with RBB in it and some other expansions that I don't advocate
  4. Aye, Crosstown is better than nothing. Now while the area now has the Q52/Q53 SBS, It's still quite underserved. As for a using RBB, I guess it could work but right now I can only see it becoming a Queens Bypass route Converting Woodhaven is a GREAT idea Are we swapping the and Queens Terminals??
  5. http://app.enmodal.co/?id=bee8c6ac61a8337f made a simple subway expansion map. Note that I made the extension that RPA Proposed, please keep in mind that I'm not advocating for it
  6. http://app.enmodal.co/?id=8b1c3d7330d9a94f @D to 96 St I made some edits to your map ^ yours http://app.enmodal.co/?id=838366dd75f059f7# my edit
  7. Well, you're not wrong yet I still feel like it could be used as a supplement. Besides, the Infrastructure is already there, lets make it useful
  8. That explains why I keep seeing Kings Highway bound trains in Queens. thanks!
  9. Why not swap both the and in the 63Rd and 53rd Street Tunnels. All replies are in bold except the last one Now let's get back to The Rockaway Beach Branch
  10. Or punish them by giving them ZERO transit what so ever, Wait, wouldn't the buildings be destroyed too?
  11. ATTENTION TO ALL FELLOW MEMBERS OF THIS CHAT, TONIGHT WE SHALL CELEBRATE
  12. It way a joke right, cause the info written was convincing ....... very convincing (suspicious face)
  13. I wasn't alive in this world until 2003 so..... NO
  14. This I can agree with. The and would be GREAT Fulton Local services and would allow the to run express to Lefferts. As for the Transit Museum in this case, I'd move it to the current Long Island City station used by the LIRR where you'd have to build a 2 or 3 floor building to store all of the artifacts and you'd have to consider sea level rise as an issue here if you want to relocate the Museum (which is what this proposal is doing). Anyways let me get a few Questions out of the way. How are you going to move all of the Museum trains into the Subway System? LIRR of course (the Main Line though) I don't think subways are allowed in Lower Montauk. Of course the only way for this to even be a possibility is to build the Queens Bypass or the extension to Rochdale/Laurelton/Rosedale. What's the point ? To allow SAS to run Local via Fulton. Isn't this the whole point of the proposal. Also one benefit is that you'll attract more tourists that way since it is now closer to Midtown, and since @RR503 mentioned ENY Redevelopment. I go to school in that area so seeing redevelopment would be nice (I know that they're building a new school in the area and it'd be better if they built an apartment complex near Crescent St which would be next to this new school. Don't believe me, go see for yourself. What happens to the artifacts? They get delivered to this new museum via truck, train, or whatever is best for them. Will the Long Island City (LIRR) station close down? NOPE. That would be pointless. Besides, there's a ferry one block away. Only 2-4 Tracks would be reserved for this new museum. A building can be built on top of this reserved trackage which would be this new museum. The Long Island RailRoad would keep the remaining Trackage and will have a "proper" station since that area BARELY looks like a station. Besides, Long Island City, Greenpoint, and Hunts Point (Queens) is going through some really nice redevelopment, so it would be logical to relocate the transit museum. How will people know about this new museum? Simple. Just advertise on the , , (LIRR), and the Nearby Ferry.
  15. What I mean is to recouple the sets, for example recouple a few 4 car sets into 5 car sets. Then you figure out what to do with the surplus of trains
  16. Is it possible for the MTA to recoupe the R179's?
  17. I remember making an "R217" months ago. I created it to replace the R68's and R68A's
  18. Unless it affected both sides then you could have done a wrong railing BUT NOPE
  19. I remember having this dream where Essex St on t he and lines lookedo like 91 St on the and it was STILL open as a station for some reason despite looking abandoned in many ways. Some trains didn't even stop in my dream
  20. Well this could be a footstep into relieving congestion from the and lines
  21. That's true. Only some of their proposals are actually worth it
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.