Via Garibaldi 8 Posted July 5, 2014 Share #26 Posted July 5, 2014 No fight by the union. As long as they continued to pay dues into their old craft (union), they could revert back any time they wanted to. That's not what was reported... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truckie Posted July 5, 2014 Share #27 Posted July 5, 2014 That's not what was reported... Again, just because it's in the media doesn't mean it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted July 5, 2014 Share #28 Posted July 5, 2014 Again, just because it's in the media doesn't mean it's true. I stand by my position... The wouldn't have taken the action that they did if they didn't have sufficient evidence to do so. You can pick at the details as you like. You and I know that the is too big, hence why these sorts of incidents occur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truckie Posted July 5, 2014 Share #29 Posted July 5, 2014 I stand by my position... You can stand by your position as much as you want. I know for a fact, any time there is information disclosed by the MTA to the media it's less than 100% correct. It's not necessarily how what the MTA discloses but how the media interprets it. In college I took media relations classes. In my experience in that class, and in past public speaking roles, the media can take any quote they want, change words around and come up with something completely different that's out of context. I know there has been information disclosed that contradicts your position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted July 5, 2014 Share #30 Posted July 5, 2014 You can stand by your position as much as you want. I know for a fact, any time there is information disclosed by the MTA to the media it's less than 100% correct. It's not necessarily how what the MTA discloses but how the media interprets it. In college I took media relations classes. In my experience in that class, and in past public speaking roles, the media can take any quote they want, change words around and come up with something completely different that's out of context. I know there has been information disclosed that contradicts your position. Well then I guess the should go and correct what was stated... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truckie Posted July 5, 2014 Share #31 Posted July 5, 2014 Well then I guess the should go and correct what was stated... They don't care about the accuracy of what gets reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTOMan Posted July 5, 2014 Share #32 Posted July 5, 2014 They don't care about the accuracy of what gets reported. You aren't kidding either..... They don't... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truckie Posted July 6, 2014 Share #33 Posted July 6, 2014 I forgot one possible pertinent part of the puzzle. When in the conductor training program (or on probation as a whole), they can get rid of you for no reason. So in the spin political entities put on issues what would sound better? 1) we fired the class because they were all cheating 2) we fired one or two people because of cheating and the rest of the class because we could (to prove a point). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted July 6, 2014 Share #34 Posted July 6, 2014 They don't care about the accuracy of what gets reported. It's really sad that both sides plays the mudslinging game... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.