Jump to content

R3216068E

Veteran Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    555

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by R3216068E

  1. R3216068E
    Delete
  2. R3216068E
    Sounds serious hopefully they have power restored and the tractor trailer removed soon it's rush hour
  3. R3216068E
    Well all the trains already look like they are already rerouted I would of responding but I don't see what you're asking exactly
  4. R3216068E
    train derails at 14 st union square commuters who use the Lexington ave line on a daily basis are extremely pissed there are a bunch of service changes Reroute away
  5. R3216068E
    Yeah I agree I would love to see R143s on QBL and 6 ave it would be nice to see something different on the
  6. R3216068E
    Yeah my bad tried to edit but the cite wouldn't let me I meant Jerome yard
  7. R3216068E
    They would go to the
  8. R3216068E
    They should move those R62as to East 180 st yard for the you can't put any on the since it shares a terminal with the and it is required to be fully NTTS
  9. R3216068E
    I agree maybe Westchester did not want to deal with those R62as I'm wondering if the crew at Westchester can stand the R62as
  10. R3216068E
    All I know is R42s can't run on the because of the conductor position I would definitely like to see R32s on the more than the R143s
  11. R3216068E
    Yup metro man he called himself he looked crazy in that costume if you ask me
  12. R3216068E
    A connection between the LIRR and the at the future subway station would be nice since the is not needed on QBL they should do something else with it
  13. R3216068E
    My bad diggin the NTTS on the to but I'm not sure how I feel about R62as on the
  14. R3216068E
    Yup the crew is getting ready for the to become CBTC in 2017 so get used to see the converted R142as more on the the R62as will all probably be off the line way before it's CBTC
  15. R3216068E
    Okay makes sense well I've could of definitely caught them and did some railfanning if my camera wasn't so f**ked up
  16. R3216068E
    Was it a rerouted or did it run the entire route? You got any photos or videos of it?
  17. R3216068E
    IMO they should just keep it simple and stick to the original plan I doubt that they would have enough trains to make that possible either and if the purpose of the is to relieve the congestion off of Lexington than it will have to use more than 8 cars. Also what Chambers St station are you talking about exactly?
  18. R3216068E
    A derailment damn what happened broken rail?
  19. R3216068E
    Yup an ocassinal R142 will pop up on the Ive been having pretty bad luck with catching it
  20. R3216068E
    Delete
  21. R3216068E
    That dispatcher is in deep trouble I remember last year when they accidentally send the over the line
  22. R3216068E
    True, but it's been sitting there for a while I hope that they do put it in service
  23. R3216068E
    There is an R143 sitting in ENY signed up as an I'm wondering if they will put in service
  24. R3216068E
    I recall the R44s and R46s not being able to become mixed sets because there were A and B cars in the R44's and the R46's. There were couplers at both ends of these cars so they were single cars rather than married pairs.
  25. R3216068E
    I have heard that the mixed set of R32s and R42s was pretty normal back then lots of trains suffered from dead motors back than and there would be alot of mixed sets
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept