Jump to content

GreatOne2k

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    1,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GreatOne2k

  1. 8 minutes ago, T to Dyre Avenue said:

    I almost feel like either the <F> model or (4)(8) skip-stop are the only real options. Maybe it would be possible to have the <4> trains stop at 161st before going express, so that all (4) service stops there. 

    Woodlawn -> Mosholu -> Burnside -> 167 - > 161 -> 149 is possible with track switching

  2. 8 hours ago, Lawrence St said:

    One if the things that makes me scratch my head, is why the W21 is a reverse-peak direction route. The W20 is one of the longest locals in the entire network, and a lot of people who live along Central Park Av want to get to the (4)(B) or (D) . The W21 instead does the reverse, by going TO White Plains in the AM and FROM Bedford Park in the PM.

    Reverse commuters going from The Bronx / Yonkers to White Plains, just like the 41 is reverse commute route with The Bronx / Mt Vernon to White Plains

  3. 52 minutes ago, Italianstallion said:

    If I read the chart above right, each of the 4 and 5 is losing ONE interval a day.

    The (5) is going to be a Dyre shuttle one hour earlier in the evening. Also, the two reverse peak (5) trips to 241 St in the morning are also cut back to Gun Hill Rd and will be running express to Gun Hill Rd instead of local north of E 180 St to 241 St

  4. Bus bunching on the Bx36 and Bx39, can happen anytime of day, middays, rush hours, even weekends. The lack of late night service on the Bx5 is another issue that should be brought up. MTA even proposed it in 2007. Bx39 service to/from Clason Point should be extended to at least 1am 7 days a week.

  5. On 9/20/2019 at 10:12 PM, Jemorie said:

    You're not even listening/reading though. How is capacity limited? Are you aware that service on both branches is much less frequent at all hours of the day including rush hour? And yes my comment was in response to yours and the two posters above.

    You can check the northbound weekday (A) schedule or the Trip Planner itself, including Saturday and Sunday. After 9 p.m., trains leave both Lefferts Blvd and Far Rockaway respectively at 25+ minute headways. Then from 10 p.m. until midnight, trains are leaving their respective terminals at roughly half-hour headways, resulting in 15-minute headways west of Rockaway Blvd onwards. I'm saying that headways should be 20 minutes on the entire line in both directions (Far Rockaway-Inwood) after the (C) stops running.

    Running the (C) to/from Lefferts Blvd is more expensive than just simply rescheduling the (A) properly to mesh with the 10-minute headways on the (C) and (D) lines and the 20-minute headways on the (S) Rockaway Park Shuttle.

    That's a service cut on the rest of the (A) to go to 20 minutes between 10-11pm, just run 12-15 minutes to Far Rockaway and start the Lefferts shuttle after the (C) stops running.

  6. 2 hours ago, Union Tpke said:

    @RR503 Something just occurred to me. Now, when (3) service ends at Times Square, (2) service runs local. With (3) service ending at Times Square an hour earlier, wouldn't that bottle up (2) service, screwing things up more?

    They already do this now from 11:47pm (first (3) shuttle) to 12:17am (last (2) express). They will just be doing this a bit longer now.

  7. 5 hours ago, R68OnBroadway said:

    The argument that you would need to kill a ton of other G.Os to run regular service is tiring... cut the (4) past 149th, end CPW/6th exp G.Os and then run the (B) on the weekends (or have (D) short turns to 2nd). It shouldn’t be difficult to choose fixing infrastructure which affects many on a daily basis over servicing a bunch of people who show up for a few hours for recreational entertainment...

    Another thing: Why don’t they install a crossover at Broadway-Lafayette between the southbound local and express to end that annoying and confusing (D)(F) swap G.O?

    MTA would likely cut the weekend (4) all together and just extend the weekend (5) to Utica / New Lots Avenue, good for weekend late night (2) / (5) riders, bad for weekend daytime (4) / (5) / (6) riders. 

  8. 50 minutes ago, Around the Horn said:

    I was just about to edit my comment but I'll add it here as a new one since RR503 quoted me already...

    Targeted week/month/however long outages on the (4) to replace track on the el with the (B) and (D) as alternatives is a good idea, and would most likely increase worker productivity. However the best time for this kind of work would be during the baseball off season.

    Even then work would have to be restricted on a few days for College Football games (including the Pinstripe Bowl) and some NYC FC soccer games.

  9. 15 minutes ago, Lex said:

    Aside from confusing passengers more, the (5) reductions have a bad tendency to come up alongside (2) reductions stemming from work in Manhattan (which, incidentally, comes up far more often than similar work in Brooklyn).

    MTA  already does this sometimes on Monday mornings after a Clark Street Tunnel shutdown. (2) service runs Flatbush - 241, but there are still (2) trains running South Ferry - Dyre after 5am, so from about 5-7am there may be two different (2) services running N/B from Chambers St to E 180 St. Also the (5) is running N/B as a Dyre shuttle while (2) trains are still running to Dyre. Guess people are used to this happening during the "transitional service period". MTA would rather run two different (2) trains than run the (5) to/from Bowling Green after 4am (like they used to do in 2011)

  10. Another option would be to run half of the (5) trains as (2) trains to South Ferry to maintain the service between E 180 St and 149 St - Grand Concourse, this way the (5) can be reduced on Lexington Avenue and there would still be the same amount of service in the Bronx.  MTA did this on a Friday evening once by suspending all (5) service from 8:30pm to 10:30pm S/B and from 10:00pm to 12:00am N/B and ran the (2) to both 241 St - Flatbush Ave and Dyre Av - South Ferry at the same time.  The (5) resumed service when the (2) and (5) swapped terminals though, the (2) just went to/from Dyre early.

  11. 1 hour ago, RR503 said:

    This is very much a NYCT problem. Weekend service reduction is a direct result of the agency’s lack of attention to GO productivity and of flagging rules developed largely by the agency. The agency may not have control over some of the more arcane work rules, but it absolutely can do a better job coordinating projects, properly scheduling work trains and flagging crews, etc. It also could either invest in track barriers to eliminate adjacent flagging, or review flagging rules to understand what in them is working and what is not while comparing to other systems’ practices. And of course there’s always the option of changing the predominant GO format — emphasizing less frequent full shutdowns over the endless dribble of one-direction reroutes. 

    With the (4)(5), the issue is the (6) and Brooklyn. You can’t run the (6) at 5tph, nor can you run Lex-Brooklyn or Jerome that low. So you run 7.5/3/7.5, which itself is really pushing it in terms of flagging capacities. I just wish they’d run 3tph of overlay service as far as 149-GC to complement the 3 of Manhattan service. 

    The (6) has to run at 5 tph when the (5) is replacing the (2) as 241 St and Flatbush Av can't have 20 minute headways. The (4) has to run local when this happens though

     

    It is either: 

    (4) 7.5 / (5) 3  / (6) 7.5  

    or

    (4) 7.5  / (5) 5  / (6)

  12. 9 minutes ago, Gotham Bus Co. said:

     

    (1) The old Bx7 used Bronx Park East south of Allerton.

    (2) Bee-Line will have to close its doors (i.e. stop carrying passengers locally) along Boston Road. 

     

    The Bx30 would also have to run on Fordham Road (and would have to swap with the Bx16 past Conner Street) for the 60/61/62 to be completely closed door

  13. The alternative is to cut the (6) to 12 minute headways and run the (4) local to keep the (5) running normally during GOs. They did this when the Clark Street Tunnels were closed. One weekend the (6) was cut back to a Pelham shuttle at 125th and the (4) and (5) went local to Brooklyn.

  14. 1 hour ago, Deucey said:

    It’s only called the Lex subway now. If you look at where it runs south of 42nd St, it was rightly called the Park Ave South-Lafayette St-Centre St-Broadway line.

    It was once called the Lexington-4th Avenue line

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.