INDman Posted July 2, 2010 Share #76 Posted July 2, 2010 or that the R-44s would be retired in 2010?). They were supposed to be gone back in 2005 according to one plan... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iGeMiNix Posted July 2, 2010 Share #77 Posted July 2, 2010 Precisely. The thing is, people try to base their reasoning (concerning this matter) on pure logic and pure realism. But this is the MTA we're talking about, and as we know, the defies all logic and realism:p (5 years ago, who would have imagined that R-42s would run on the , or that the R-44s would be retired in 2010?). Well R44s weren't even in great shape back then, so it would be no surprise lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R32 3348 Posted July 3, 2010 Share #78 Posted July 3, 2010 Replies in RED (above) There is a difference between storing trains in one yard and having them based out of that yard. ( trains regularly lay up in Concourse but they are based out of CI. They do not see any maintenance at Concourse (apart from car washes, I'd assume, since R160s regularly go up to Concourse for the same reason). trains lay up in CI but they are not based out of that yard either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.