Harlem Crosstown

But you know what? that aint half bad Wait never mind they covered the windows. Execute them. jk

We can double track it. It’ll be harder, yes but more capacity is better if more freight and later commuter rail is needed.

CPW has an issue with that as well.

I bet the R211s will have a voice similar to the “Fred” voice on Mac computers.

I had an idea to run trains with 4 tracks, 2 to Fulton and one to Utica via Bushwick Ave. In the Bronx/Queens the Utica train and a Fulton train would run to Bway 125 Street via the express ( take local) while another Fulton train would run to the Bypass and Laurelton. North Queens would be served by an extension of the Astoria Line.

If we’re going to be cost effective with the SAS then we should construct it with two tracks with provisions for two more express tracks, this is how they built the 6th Ave line and maybe other lines in other cities.

:S

I would extend the LGA trains to Flushing in this proposal.

Another R160 look-alike

Here’s how I would run service: from Queens on a connection to QBL local after Forest Hills. would run to Culver Express and Coney Island with terminating at 18th and at Church. would run on the Jamaica Line to a Jamaica Express, ending at Jamaica Center. Yes I am aware the would have very close terminals, so I think the at north end could run on a Northern Blvd subway.

I recommend using the instead. Better track pairing and SAS in Brooklyn should mainly focus on connections.

I see your point but I was not saying it is a problem just making note of that.

Following up to this, if trains run local and express you get a lot of interlining but the still gets to be a separate service.

If we de-interlined CPW, 8th, and Fulton then the just becomes a truncated line.

Would SAS Queens traffic best be used on Northern Blvd?