biGC323232

Well they inspecting them real fast...I saw 6471 working the 119 6476 on the 10

Didnt hear that...But it would make sense....

From what i heard njt transit is hiring new drivers for the new take over routes...

Well that will means that they gonna find a way to take over the A&C Routes or send those buses to other garages...

Thats whats gonna have to happen....All that would do is add about five mins as it would just have to do the danforth ave loop or have it simply end at society hill ppl needing greenville along westside stiil have the 80 there....The 80s also gonna have to run more during the day not just rush hours if transit decide to go with that option...Its gonna be interesting how this play out cause greenville and meadowlands is max out after the 119/10 takeover...Only way i see this work if the buses from A&C go to Ironbound and do the Routes from there...Cause if transit leave those lines (Talking mainly 30 33) without backup the 80 and especially the 87 gonna be packed beyond measures...

How do they even know money on the metrocards...Im just curious...

I get what u saying...Im Also well aware of the ending times of the 10 and 80 lol.....In my opinion those 2 routes need service of they own not reroutes...Yes u can reroute the 10 down bergen av...But whats gonna cover the reroute 10s and the plaza area in bayonne that the bergen do serve....Bayonne already have fits over everything...10 up bergen ave not gonna go well with them.....They will be like walk a block and use the 87 the way most do already....30 was created to actually help the 80 and 80s along westside ave...Those was the only routes serving JSQ from Westside Ave Until 1994.... Now adding more 80's gonna help to some extent...But which 80 and where the extra buses coming from Greenville is maxed...the 30 runs more like the 80S Which is a big difference from the normal 80... Now if transit decides to say forget them and just use the 80...Ok now a good portion of northern part of westside and sip ave is with just the number 1 and 80s rush hours only....Me personally when AC do give up the service ill give AC buses to Ironbound Garage and let them operate the 30 and 32 33 They should have space for additional buses plus the dead head is not far at all.......That 4 sanaga shouldnt went like that...86 and number 1 should had been left alone....They should had just rerouted the 81 in that case...

How u figure....M was just an extended line already at eny...not a new line to the yard..(T to dyre also pointed out that the M was Also in south bklyn at that time)...but there where enough cars to warrent the M to run to Bay Parkway ???...Also around that time M trains also ran to Coney and J to 95st Cause of 9/11...

Lol..I'm merely talking about later in the night... Before AC took over the last Bergen Ave left JSQ at 1230 now been reduced to 7 pm on a Saturday..yikes....yes the 30 and 80 share West side Ave most of it..but the 30 run more like the 80S (with the exception that it serves Society Hill) which only runs rush hours and use sip rather than Montgomery... which also ran on wkends...the 10 can run straight up Bergen Ave but what about that Eastern portion the Bergen do serve...

It wasnt just the 80s they resorted to this service change....Each time work needed to be done on the bridge one side was lefted opened....There was plenty of times in recent years where both and terminated at 34st

Not really...How was the really helping the at that time even when it ran on 4 av......U still had to make a transfer for mid town and uptown service...Thats why they had the split at that time for one simple transfer at 34st....

You talking the 30 and the 33...Yeah they can...Years ago on weekends they did both 80 and 81....Me personally ill give all they routes and buses to ironbound.....And when they do take over the routes they need to look into the 33 and 30 ending so early and run them a bit later...Especially the 33

To me when they rerouted the over the 63st tube the should have became the replacement then....Jamaica would have kept their cars and the wouldnt been cut from 6 to 4 cars...Thats just me

To this day i still dont get the meaning of that detoured 86...lol....My thang is which garage....Ill give it too Nwk-Orange...I dont think greenville or meadow can handle more routes

Wow..So thats the end of the IBOA era i guess....So any word on whos taking over the routes...

Wow...Thats interesting.....

They can if they wanted to...They can have it run the way it use too...

Yup..Smell like theres a fire everywhere....I acutally put on a mask...Making me dizzy...Be safe out there

Big facts...So true about trains going to astor place and Grand Central....In my opinion PATH should have extended to Tsq or Grand Central at the time they made room to fit Todays IND 6 ave Line...Can u imagine the Path at TSQ or Grand Central nowadays...

I agree PATH Should have been Extended to serve 42st..Not so much wall st...Thats literally right around the corner....

Sorry about ya back...I know how u feel once in a while i get a lil stiff..Our age is definitely catching up i just turned 44.....lol...I would say the 87 would have the most ridership out of them...80 to me is next...81 gained a boost in ridership when A&C Took away the 4 off ocean av...83 84 85 86 88 89...I rarely took those..But i can say that the 84 and 86 has decent ridership north of Newark Ave...

I swear one day i have to fan like this......Few weeks ago i did a little fanning....1 to penn for the 76 to hackensack 178 to Gwb A Train down to fulton st for the path to nwk for the 1 back home...Had to pick up my daughter from school...

I wondered that for years...lol...All u gonna hear is that some trains are gonna carry air trains are gonna skip stations with high ridership etc etc etc...

I would assume cause of the weekend apps most ppl are using now...

That part.... They could'nt send the a bit further than Bway Jct....Why not Cresent or 121st ???