Jump to content

biGC323232

Veteran Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,613

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Everything posted by biGC323232

  1. biGC323232
    Exactly how they did it..I remember those days....Me personally i would run the to 14 st not Times Sq late nights....34st and 14 st has key connections that would make sending it there more useful...My Personal opinion
  2. biGC323232
    Few months ago someone subway surfing fell from the top of the 7 train...Just last dec im riding the J Just to see someone riding on the outside of the door not just one station either...From Essex to Gates...Im like this guy insane but held on....Where these kids get the guts to do such a dangerous act...
  3. biGC323232
    Back in the 90s i can recall some 83s did terminate in Ridgefield....I dont know if it was the exact spot b35 metioned but i do remember that
  4. biGC323232
    Yes i would avoid those Areas Totally.....If i was to make a 83 express i would have it run from JSQ-Bergen Tpke peak direction only via JFK Blvd
  5. biGC323232
    Some not Most get off in Union City...Again splitting this route other than making it express on a certain portion isnt really gonna do much...There are ppl that travel to Hackensack from both JC and UC and Vice Versa.......Forcing ppl in the middle of the route to transfer to another bus to complete there trip is gonna cause Complaints from JC And UC passengers....
  6. biGC323232
    You do realize a good bulk of the ridership comes from JSQ-Summit Ave...Splitting it 3 ways wont solve anything in my opinion...Would force ppl to do unnessary Transfers....What they can do in my opinion is add a couple of Express runs in the peak direction...I would have it express from Jsq-Bergen Tpke am vice versa pm using JFK Blvd Between the 2
  7. biGC323232
    125 also
  8. biGC323232
    Makes good sense to me
  9. biGC323232
    As much as i would love that i think those R211 Gonna go to the or ... trains should get a piece of that order in my opinion...Only 24 hour line in the b division that havent yet receive any NTT...Also i do agree with the running on weekends 145 st- Brighton Beach...
  10. biGC323232
    LMAO....Wow a simple cat or chicken causes delays...Back in the day trains simply running over any pets on the rails...
  11. biGC323232
    The driver that showed up was from Hilton....Training for what the 1 Route....Drivers from both meadowlands and Hilton should by now know how to operate those...Are you saying Hilton and meadow gonna combined as one garage when you say same class
  12. biGC323232
    Wow..20905 is on the 1 as a speak...did meadowlands transfer this bus to hilton or a driver fill in
  13. biGC323232
    From what i heard..Greyhound suppose to had redone the inside of the term..Making it unsafe for buses to board ppl...
  14. biGC323232
    They dont..That probably was from Meadowlands...They also do the 167
  15. biGC323232
    Lmao...Half Naked...Jesus christ...Just this morning saw on the news a 70 plus year old man get shoved to the ground then showed the attacker farebeating on the train...Yes things is way out of control...Subways resorting back to the 80s except the graffiti on the trains..lol
  16. biGC323232
    119 has its base ridership yes...but for those 3 rts i wouldnt go as far as to say the 119 out ridership those 3 even tho its 24 hours ....now if transit resort back to the way it use to run(along palisade and not central ave and stopping in the jsq term) and cut the 123 back to congress 9st light rail then u got me on ridership ...drivers at meadowlands gonna be thrill to not have to deal with what those lines represents and with a simple north and south rt...lol
  17. biGC323232
    Wow...so meadowlands give up basicly 5 rts (if u add park ave) for just the 119...wow thats a steal...lol
  18. biGC323232
    But that also was at the time it ran along palisade and not the way it does today...using MCIs was a bit easier for drivers....but yes those where great times i agree...in my opinion they should have nevered changed that rt...it wasnt broken but they fixed it...LOL
  19. biGC323232
    Artics might pop up on the 119 as well as MCIS probably not for the 10...unless greenville split the 10 rt with meadowlands....
  20. biGC323232
    I always said after coach usa stop it years ago that greenville should have taking 10 and 99s at the time...few members here said greenville is at capacity and cant take anymore which i somewhat agreed to...so now greenville able to handle a 24 hour rt with they own or some nabis from nwk going to greenville...meadowlands most likely do the overnight portion of the 10 and 119
  21. biGC323232
    The 4 Became a low ridership line when Couch Usa tookover they cut the frequencies that Layfayette & Greenville had for the Local-Newport....Buy then the HBLR Was finished...Then the A&C Took over running buses every 35-40 mins...Riders basicly got fed up and started to take the HBLR... replaceing the downtown portion with the #1 and 86...4 line went into History after that
  22. biGC323232
    Absolutely...Back in the 90s and even early 2000 up to like 2005-2006 bus service across hudson was way better than today...Mainly due to The Iboa's before they went out of business
  23. biGC323232
    Why not just extend the 78 and have it run most of the day to the mall....I mean if they want a Nwk-American Mall thats what i would do...
  24. biGC323232
    Mainly cause some of the garages cant handle some of the route thats assign to them....One route can consist of like 4 to 5 different destinations
  25. biGC323232
    Believe it or not .....Howell been helping the 126 in the morning too with a couple trips despite it using four other garages...Mainly towards NYC
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept