Ceya Posted February 20, 2011 Share #126 Posted February 20, 2011 What a waste of money. Time and time again the do-nothing suits vilify the workers (yes, there's a difference between an empty suit and an employee) while they piss away gobs of money on useless "consulting" and "studies". That Bloomberg budget for you. We got no money, cuts everywhere but wasting money on building steet parks and stupid studies. 250,000 can help some teachers stay in school, transit employee , fire station open. Nope not in NYC. S/F, CEYA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vistausss Posted February 20, 2011 Share #127 Posted February 20, 2011 Facepalm....LOL the New Tunnel is for NJT and Amtrak to share.....NJT is regional travel and Amtrak is for Intercity Rail travel.... I thought it was only for Amtrak 'cause Christie rejected the NJT tunnel share? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
East New York Posted February 21, 2011 Share #128 Posted February 21, 2011 Why are we talking about this when Amtrak already planned the Gateway Project. It seems like the Gateway Project already won. The extension would most likely not happen so it's time to drop it. We are talking about this because research is underway to see if a 7 train extention to NJ is viable. I thought it was only for Amtrak 'cause Christie rejected the NJT tunnel share? The tunnel was always for both Amtrak and NJT to share. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Line1291 Posted February 21, 2011 Share #129 Posted February 21, 2011 If they could spend money on a study for the to NJ, then why couldn't a study be done for a subway-freight tunnel to Staten. New Jersey already has the NJT, Amtrak, ferries, and bridges to get to New York.... and Staten Island just has the ferry and bridge. What the world, get the priorty straight City Hall... Real Talk!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadcruiser1 Posted February 21, 2011 Share #130 Posted February 21, 2011 That was talked about in the SIR thread. Go there if you want to rant about that. I personally believe that Staten Island should have some sort of efficent connection to NYC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexis4Jersey Posted February 22, 2011 Share #131 Posted February 22, 2011 If they could spend money on a study for the to NJ, then why couldn't a study be done for a subway-freight tunnel to Staten. New Jersey already has the NJT, Amtrak, ferries, and bridges to get to New York.... and Staten Island just has the ferry and bridge. What the world, get the priorty straight City Hall... Real Talk!!!! We already have a freight line to SI its right next to the Goethals Bridge.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Up Front Posted February 22, 2011 Share #132 Posted February 22, 2011 Even still, people would want that line to extend to Manhattan for all the poor souls - I mean, people who have to commute from NJ to the city. Isn't, or wasn't, that connection a part of the North Shore branch of the SIR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadcruiser1 Posted February 22, 2011 Share #133 Posted February 22, 2011 The SIR was never linked to Manhattan. It was, and still is linked to NJ via freight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vistausss Posted March 30, 2011 Share #134 Posted March 30, 2011 By the way, this extension is nothing new: http://www.nycsubway.org/articles/erj-1926-njplan.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.