Brighton Local Posted December 29, 2007 Share #1 Posted December 29, 2007 (Q)uincy received a "C"! (N)ancy received a "C-"! Folks, what went wrong here? These 2 lines are probably the 2 most efficient routes in the system through out its entirety. (W)iskey received a "D+".... wow. The isn't that bad to steep down to the grade the Rockaway Parkway received. And to think, how many of us thought the or would receive at least a "B". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pelham Bay Dave Posted December 29, 2007 Share #2 Posted December 29, 2007 Just checked MTA website and the grades are in for all the lines and some I can't believe. The(1) C- C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R1Toasty Posted December 29, 2007 Share #3 Posted December 29, 2007 It seems that we're a little picky, eh? I would have given the at least a B, probably more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainfan22 Posted December 29, 2007 Share #4 Posted December 29, 2007 This is the biggest load of crap i have seen how the hell the Q line get an c this is just bull the Q line shoud have gotten an A++++ just for having the R68a and plus and it is the best subway line in the northeast as for the N line it probely got that grade because the D train is goes in front of it at 36 street and long wait times and the crappy stations on the sea beach line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brighton Local Posted December 29, 2007 Author Share #5 Posted December 29, 2007 I feel, the & should've received at least a "B+". To be mean, a "B". Never lower than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo M 201 Posted December 29, 2007 Share #6 Posted December 29, 2007 The should've got a higher grade, at least a B+. I'm surprised the didn't get a worse grade than it got. I thought it would've got a D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sebbieprops Posted December 31, 2007 Share #7 Posted December 31, 2007 Here's how I'd rate each of them: : B : B+ : B : B- : B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted December 31, 2007 Share #8 Posted December 31, 2007 (Q)uincy received a "C"! (N)ancy received a "C-"! Folks, what went wrong here? These 2 lines are probably the 2 most efficient routes in the system through out its entirety. (W)iskey received a "D+".... wow. The isn't that bad to steep down to the grade the Rockaway Parkway received. And to think, how many of us thought the or would receive at least a "B". Underrated, all of them. The easily deserved a B/B+. The was also the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superdotny Posted December 31, 2007 Share #9 Posted December 31, 2007 I agree with the assessment made by many of you guys. I think many straphangers are judging ONE incident to grade the train lines. The and and IRT and trains deserve better grades! One more thing...dirty trains. I heard one rider said something the cleanliness of the trains this today on the train! I was enraged. I took up the courage and responded to him, but saying, "Look at the doors. Do you see those shoe marks? Look at the windows. See those scratches? All of those are created by the public's lack of responsibility, including you. You are placing you dirty worker boots on the door on a new R160 subway car right now. Shame on you!" (Train stops, I leave. I believe he looked kind of stunned) :mad: I was on the ..Siemens 8892. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eastman346 Posted January 1, 2008 Share #10 Posted January 1, 2008 they all got bum grades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMT4Life Posted January 2, 2008 Share #11 Posted January 2, 2008 Here's how I'd rate each of them: : B : B+ : B : B- : B Those grades would have been resonable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.