SIR North Shore Posted August 19, 2011 Share #1 Posted August 19, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIR North Shore Posted August 19, 2011 Author Share #2 Posted August 19, 2011 I like this one better.. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shortline Bus Posted August 19, 2011 Share #3 Posted August 19, 2011 Good fine North Shore:cool:. I can't open link to the new schedule so when will this new "S83" run? Rush Hours only or hopefully at least all day weekdays? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted August 19, 2011 Share #4 Posted August 19, 2011 LOL@SIR North Shore... Well it would be hilarious if the called it anything but the S83 after all of this time, but yeah I like this also... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIR North Shore Posted August 19, 2011 Author Share #5 Posted August 19, 2011 This isn't a real schedule Shortline.. but it would be very nice to see. I say we all send either of those pictures in to the MTA until they get the message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted August 19, 2011 Share #6 Posted August 19, 2011 If you're going to make a mock timetable at least state that you are doing so...otherwise you're just deceiving people that there will be an S83 when that's not certain yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted August 19, 2011 Share #7 Posted August 19, 2011 If you're going to make a mock timetable at least state that you are doing so...otherwise you're just deceiving people that there will be an S83 when that's not certain yet. lol... I gotta admit he almost had me for a second, but then I saw the date on it and knew that it wasn't possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shortline Bus Posted August 19, 2011 Share #8 Posted August 19, 2011 This isn't a real schedule Shortline.. but it would be very nice to see. I say we all send either of those pictures in to the MTA until they get the message. woops my bad:o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysterious2train Posted August 19, 2011 Share #9 Posted August 19, 2011 Nice picture! (Being someone who edits stuff like this anyway, I knew it was fake ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
checkmatechamp13 Posted August 19, 2011 Share #10 Posted August 19, 2011 Don't worry, maybe that schedule will become reality within a year or so. Look, you're welcome to help me and Via Garibaldi out rather than complaining to us. You're going to have to put in some actual work if you want this to become reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted August 19, 2011 Share #11 Posted August 19, 2011 Don't worry, maybe that schedule will become reality within a year or so. Look, you're welcome to help me and Via Garibaldi out rather than complaining to us. You're going to have to put in some actual work if you want this to become reality. I agree... You and I have both talked to the about this and we've written to officials as well. SIR North could do the same if he really wants the S83 to become reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B35 via Church Posted August 19, 2011 Share #12 Posted August 19, 2011 I thought it (this thread) was a further extension of the discussions checkmate & via were having about a 53 LTD variant..... had I not known anything about that, I would've said some'n similar to what LRG is sayin... which is a valid point..... I wasn't duped, or what they call "rickrolled" by this, simply b/c there was no text (commentary) below the actual image.... no thoughts, questions, discussion, nothin.... just a pic..... ....but what's the deal with this thread right now; tryna figure out what checkmate's post is in reference to.... Who's complaining.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
checkmatechamp13 Posted August 19, 2011 Share #13 Posted August 19, 2011 I thought it (this thread) was a further extension of the discussions checkmate & via were having about a 53 LTD variant..... had I not known anything about that, I would've said some'n similar to what LRG is sayin... which is a valid point..... I wasn't duped, or what they call "rickrolled" by this, simply b/c there was no text (commentary) below the actual image.... no thoughts, questions, discussion, nothin.... just a pic..... ....but what's the deal with this thread right now; tryna figure out what checkmate's post is in reference to.... Who's complaining.... SIR North Shore. He keeps on complaining about the lack of the S83, but he hasn't actually done anything to get it implemented, like Via Garibaldi and myself have been doing. I mean, we already "broke the ice", so to speak by attending the hearing and getting all of the contacts together. Even if he can't attend the meetings, he can write emails to those people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted August 19, 2011 Share #14 Posted August 19, 2011 All talk no action lol you gotta love that.... You know the saying action speaks louder than words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B35 via Church Posted August 20, 2011 Share #15 Posted August 20, 2011 SIR North Shore. He keeps on complaining about the lack of the S83, but he hasn't actually done anything to get it implemented, like Via Garibaldi and myself have been doing. I mean, we already "broke the ice", so to speak by attending the hearing and getting all of the contacts together. Even if he can't attend the meetings, he can write emails to those people. I see.... thanks for the explanation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santa Fe via Willow Posted August 21, 2011 Share #16 Posted August 21, 2011 :cool:Good work North Shore:tup: Hopefully that 53/(83) map/timetable will be reality SOON:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.