Jump to content

What if the Polo Grounds Shuttle/Culver Av Shuttle never closed and still survived today?


Javier

Recommended Posts


Just a general statement the 148th St terminal didn't even open until the late 1960s. It probably wouldn't even exist today if the extension occurred, and maybe even have 145th st extend its platform to fit 10 car trains.

If the polos were unable for expansion or the Yankees station relocation had to tear down the polo shuttle tracks, a bridge that would run be running from 145th to 167th Street (the (3) tracks would make an upper level and the connection would be made at where the polo tracks originally were) is a possible way the (3) extension could of worked. 148th street would not operate and close under this plan.

I'd probably work the sea level problem out with the northbound track rising up sightly on the side of the yard, then the southbound track traveling underneath the track when it gets the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because I remember last year I read somewhere that some teens threw a party in the Sedgwick Av tunnels, but I thought those tunnels were sealed off after 9/11.

The plan I have does NOT use those tunnels, especially since you have to take any such line further south due to where Yankee Stadium now is.

 

You would have to have this version go via East 157th Street next to Heritage Park and swing north there, as noted most likely allowing this version to stop at 161-Yankee Stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The plan I have does NOT use those tunnels, especially since you have to take any such line further south due to where Yankee Stadium now is.

 

You would have to have this version go via East 157th Street next to Heritage Park and swing north there, as noted most likely allowing this version to stop at 161-Yankee Stadium.

I'd rather have 153rd Street be used, as 153rd is a more "direct route" than 157th Street.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again...

 

How is the line gonna get to the Bronx with that entire area at sea level, and the Harlem River Drive being right in the way impeding any bridge?

Right!

Like I said as well, this would be next-to if not impossible.  Too many engineering obstacles to overcome in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again...

 

How is the line gonna get to the Bronx with that entire area at sea level, and the Harlem River Drive being right in the way impeding any bridge?

Can't the line go shift through the columns under the FDR and slowly rise up via 153/157 St and river to meet the Jerome line? Not that this would happen, but can't it be a possibility?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't the line go shift through the columns under the FDR and slowly rise up via 153/157 St and river to meet the Jerome line? Not that this would happen, but can't it be a possibility?

It would be a very steep grade for a bridge, and boats and whatnot would only have clearance on one side of this hypothetical (Bronx side) side of the bridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If clearance is a problem, couldn't you just dive under the Harlem River and then transition to an elevated line in the Bronx, merging with the (4) before 161 St?

The question is how deep is that River. If it is deep it won't be that easy to structure a tunnel being so close to the water as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Culver Shuttle was still around, it would make an alternate routing via 4th Avenue for either a prospective Culver Express service separate from the (F) (one that could possibly run via Broadway or Nassau Street) or an alternate for the  (F) itself in case of GOs. There would be no need for a shuttle in that case during the week at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Culver Shuttle was still around, it would make an alternate routing via 4th Avenue for either a prospective Culver Express service separate from the (F) (one that could possibly run via Broadway or Nassau Street) or an alternate for the  (F) itself in case of GOs. There would be no need for a shuttle in that case during the week at least.

My plan would be for an actual route.  This perhaps could even down the road be a potential 24/7 route for the (B) where it goes to Coney Island via 4th Avenue, a rebuilt Culver Shuttle (now full-time El) though slightly off the old route and the existing Culver route while allowing the (F) outside of rush hours and late nights to terminate mostly at Kings Highway.  Such would also give CPW a 6th Avenue local line at all times (the (W) could be extended to Brighton Beach to replace the (B) if that happened).  

 

Another option would be for this to bring access to the Broadway line via Culver by having the (W) run to Coney Island or Kings Highway this way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is how deep is that River. If it is deep it won't be that easy to structure a tunnel being so close to the water as it is.

 

It's 22 feet deep, which is about a two story building. It wouldn't be particularly hard to do for the (3), especially since there are already other river crossings as tunnels in the area (Lex, the (2))

How do we make the (3) go underground to meet the (4) without harming the way the Harlem residents live.

 

Underground to the Bronx, and going aboveground somewhere near Yankee Stadium would be the least disruptive route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's 22 feet deep, which is about a two story building. It wouldn't be particularly hard to do for the (3), especially since there are already other river crossings as tunnels in the area (Lex, the (2))

 

 

Underground to the Bronx, and going aboveground somewhere near Yankee Stadium would be the least disruptive route.

Yeah that's not bad at all that's about 800"-1000" of track should be able to clear 22-24 feet @ a 3% grade some of the steepest grades on the subway are upwards of 5% so if they really had to dig they could..1600" of track @ 2% would be smooth as ice could clear an additional 30+ feet easy.. What type of sediment for the bed of The harlem river? and How were the other tunnels built Boring and pressurized or just dropped into place and sank which would have been clock work for minor depths like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you know it can't happen?

The portal that the (3) comes out is about 200' away from the water's edge. Any tunnel to the Bronx would have it looping clockwise around the yard (and 148 St station) just to get the necessary grade clearance for a tunnel.

 

You would have to completely redesign the whole station and yard area (which sits under a building) just for some hypothetical extension

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The portal that the (3) comes out is about 200' away from the water's edge. Any tunnel to the Bronx would have it looping clockwise around the yard (and 148 St station) just to get the necessary grade clearance for a tunnel.

 

You would have to completely redesign the whole station and yard area (which sits under a building) just for some hypothetical extension

Right!

 

I doubt anyone thought of the idea to extend the (3) by having it run to The Bronx when they were building the station at 148th back in the 1960's or even before that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.