Jump to content
Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.
Sign in to follow this  
mark1447

NYC Subway Map gets Updated!(July 2009)

Recommended Posts

With the (MTA) Gearing up for the (G) to Church in (2) days (July 5th) and has already extended the (5) to flatbush. The T/A already updated the Map:

 

http://mta.info/nyct/maps/submap.htm

 

Changes:

 

(5) No longer a part time line for (5) To flatbush

(G) Extended down to church. Last time in a map was during the 70s

And minor fixes

 

Nothing Changed here of course:

 

(5) Strip map:

 

http://mta.info/nyct/service/fiveline.htm

 

(G) Strip map:

 

http://mta.info/nyct/service/gline.htm

 

Pick up the new maps when avaiable. maybe not till mid-july to finish up the Maps of March 2009, i think

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it me or are nearly all of the subway bullets different in the PDF version? This is what I see:

 

bulletsu.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your program isn't using the embedded fonts on the PDF file. Try re-installing the program.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fixed it. I had redownload the file 3 times, but it worked.

 

Funny, since (N)(Q)(R)(W) worked all the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heh...subtle. They also moved the location of the South Ferry station from the old one, to represent the location of the new station (and obviously added the xfer to Whitehall)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Subway Service Guide proves that the new (5) signs that say "To Flatbush Av, weekdays & eves" are wrong. But, nice that they updated it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats true. check this out... the following has not been changed yet:

 

-(G) train schedule hasn't been changed

http://mta.info/nyct/service/pdf/tgcur.pdf

 

-Strip maps for the (D)(F)(G)(M)(N)(R)(5) trains hasn't been updated

 

-(N) train scheduled added the (G) at the 9 St-4 Av station, but not the (1) at Whitehall St-South Ferry Terminal

http://mta.info/nyct/service/pdf/tncur.pdf

 

-(1) train schedule didn't add the (N) at Whitehall St-South Ferry Station.

http://mta.info/nyct/service/pdf/t1cur.pdf

 

B16, B35, B37, B63, B67, B68, B69, B75 and B77 have not updated their schedules either.

 

B16:

http://mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/bkln/b016cur.pdf

 

B35:

http://mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/bkln/b035cur.pdf

 

B37:

http://mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/bkln/b037cur.pdf

 

B63:

http://mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/bkln/b063cur.pdf

 

B67:

http://mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/bkln/b067cur.pdf

 

B68:

http://mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/bkln/b068cur.pdf

 

B69:

http://mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/bkln/b069cur.pdf

 

B75:

http://mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/bkln/b075cur.pdf

 

B77:

http://mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/bkln/b077cur.pdf

 

The Brooklyn Bus Map has not been updated with the (G) train extension as well. they should really start doing that now. all (MTA) information should be accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Few things to bring up:

 

1. http://mta.info/nyct/service/GserviceChanges.htm shows that the Culver Viaduct will be under repair for 4 years. Does this mean that the (G) extension won't last long?

 

2. http://mta.info/nyct/service/gline.htm shows that the (G)'s strip map has been updated.

 

3. This may be old, but how come Avenue U and Neck Road on the (Q) doesn't say that only the northbound platforms are open?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. http://mta.info/nyct/service/GserviceChanges.htm shows that the Culver Viaduct will be under repair for 4 years. Does this mean that the (G) extension won't last long??

 

Well let me bring up what your link said:

This new extended (G) route for the will be in effect for approximately 4 years.
. They didn't say the construction will last for 4 years, it said the (G) will only be extended for 4 years. So you already have your answer. As of now, this isn't permanent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the 5 no longer terminates at Bowling Green, then would the old South Ferry loops be entirely abandoned?

 

It's still going to terminate there nights and weekends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just saw few minutes at LGA Central Terminal on $2.00 has been cross and magic marker sign indicated 25 to indicate fare is $2.25.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well let me bring up what your link said: . They didn't say the construction will last for 4 years, it said the (G) will only be extended for 4 years. So you already have your answer. As of now, this isn't permanent.

 

The reason behind the (G)'s extension though is because of the reconstruction of the Culver Viaduct, which includes rehabilitation to the Smith-Ninth Streets and Fourth Avenue stations, which will also see renovation of the express tracks (notice how at Smith-Ninth there's a ton of stuff on the tracks, so they can't use them now).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The reason behind the (G)'s extension though is because of the reconstruction of the Culver Viaduct, which includes rehabilitation to the Smith-Ninth Streets and Fourth Avenue stations, which will also see renovation of the express tracks (notice how at Smith-Ninth there's a ton of stuff on the tracks, so they can't use them now).

 

makes me wonder if the (MTA) would ever build an Express-Local Station on the Viaduct, which that i doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The reason behind the (G)'s extension though is because of the reconstruction of the Culver Viaduct, which includes rehabilitation to the Smith-Ninth Streets and Fourth Avenue stations, which will also see renovation of the express tracks (notice how at Smith-Ninth there's a ton of stuff on the tracks, so they can't use them now).

 

Exactly my point. The (MTA) is only extending the (G) for construction purposes, not for a service increase. The (G) does not have to necessarily terminate at Church throughout the entire project. I'm sure during the later phases of this project it would be possible for the (G) to once again, terminate at Smith & 9th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly my point. The (MTA) is only extending the (G) for construction purposes, not for a service increase. The (G) does not have to necessarily terminate at Church throughout the entire project. I'm sure during the later phases of this project it would be possible for the (G) to once again, terminate at Smith & 9th.

 

In 2013, riders are going to fight (I'll emphasize that: FIGHT) to keep the (G) at Church Avenue because they're going to want (F) express service as well. Don't count on the (G) going back to Smith-Ninth Street because the MTA will be downgrading service. They've done it before, but riders will not let the MTA fall through this one that easily!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In 2013, riders are going to fight (I'll emphasize that: FIGHT) to keep the (G) at Church Avenue because they're going to want (F) express service as well. Don't count on the (G) going back to Smith-Ninth Street because the MTA will be downgrading service. They've done it before, but riders will not let the MTA fall through this one that easily!

 

Actually a lot of Park Slope residents don't want the (F) running express because they will lose their 1 seat ride to Manhattan. The only ones who will, would be the ones living in Kensington, or by 7th Avenue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In 2013, riders are going to fight (I'll emphasize that: FIGHT) to keep the (G) at Church Avenue because they're going to want (F) express service as well. Don't count on the (G) going back to Smith-Ninth Street because the MTA will be downgrading service. They've done it before, but riders will not let the MTA fall through this one that easily!
For it to be a downgrade, there has to be an upgrade to begin with. Yesterday I took the (G) at Hoyt-Schemerhorn instead of my usual (A) to the (F) at Jay St and I quickly was reminded of why I stopped taking the (G). It still has long intervals between trains. There has no been no increase of trains on the (G), simply an extension of the line. Queens bound the (G) is still packed coming from Smith-9th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For it to be a downgrade, there has to be an upgrade to begin with. Yesterday I took the (G) at Hoyt-Schemerhorn instead of my usual (A) to the (F) at Jay St and I quickly was reminded of why I stopped taking the (G). It still has long intervals between trains. There has no been no increase of trains on the (G), simply an extension of the line. Queens bound the (G) is still packed coming from Smith-9th.

 

I guess I should stick with the A to F transfer @ Jay unless the G comes to Hoyt-Schemerhorn like right away! I tend to come from Rockaway Blvd from time to time to go to Bay Ridge.

You got the G in the AM yet or the F always keep on coming 1st?

 

 

BTW The new Brooklyn Bus Map is out as I got 1 yesterday when I got on the B44 LTD bus and it does have the G to Church Ave!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess I should stick with the A to F transfer @ Jay unless the G comes to Hoyt-Schemerhorn like right away! I tend to come from Rockaway Blvd from time to time to go to Bay Ridge.

You got the G in the AM yet or the F always keep on coming 1st?

 

 

BTW The new Brooklyn Bus Map is out as I got 1 yesterday when I got on the B44 LTD bus and it does have the G to Church Ave!

During the morning I take a different route than my evening route. I take the (R) to Pacific St ( or the (D) or (N) to Pacific if they are coming across the platform) to a New Lots (3) train and take that to Rockaway Avenue and take the B60 to Canarsie from there (Yes, long commute but I don't have to walk so many stairs). On the afternoon, I take the (L) to the (A) to the (F) to the (R) so I decided to try the (G) to 4th Avenue. I would have been better off taking the (A) to Jay St for the (F). When the (G) finally showed up, as it was approaching Bergen St, it stopped because the (F) was crossing ahead. Would have been better off with he (F). So if time is of an essence to you, take the (F).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In 2013, riders are going to fight (I'll emphasize that: FIGHT) to keep the (G) at Church Avenue because they're going to want (F) express service as well. Don't count on the (G) going back to Smith-Ninth Street because the MTA will be downgrading service. They've done it before, but riders will not let the MTA fall through this one that easily!
And I'm sure also, because they will not want to lose the transfer at 4th Ave. That's one reason why the (MTA) sometimes does not implement nonessential possible service changes that would only be temporary. Because they know the riders will become used to it and not want it cut back when whatever project is over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
During the morning I take a different route than my evening route. I take the (R) to Pacific St ( or the (D) or (N) to Pacific if they are coming across the platform) to a New Lots (3) train and take that to Rockaway Avenue and take the B60 to Canarsie from there (Yes, long commute but I don't have to walk so many stairs). On the afternoon, I take the (L) to the (A) to the (F) to the (R) so I decided to try the (G) to 4th Avenue. I would have been better off taking the (A) to Jay St for the (F). When the (G) finally showed up, as it was approaching Bergen St, it stopped because the (F) was crossing ahead. Would have been better off with he (F). So if time is of an essence to you, take the (F).

 

Ah all right! Always thought the PM route was the same as the AM however that sounds a bit like me in a way back when I was attending training school except the difference was that the AM route was for the most part the same however I always had a different way to go home in the PM(If I need to go straight home that is in the PM)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.