bobtehpanda Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8901 Posted March 29, 2020 6 hours ago, Collin said: I believe the and run 15 tph each during peak hours, so the QB express tracks already run 30 tph without CBTC. With CBTC, it's supposed to be increased to 33. Since the is the most crowded of the QB routes, I think it should be increased to 18 tph (12 to Archer and 6 to 179th) while the stays at 15. Could WTC reasonably turn 18 tph? WTC is a two track platform with no tail tracks. It currently struggles with the but that's partially because of the nasty Canal St merge. You'd have to get the out of the way to even get close to 18. To put this in perspective, New South Ferry is also a two-track station with no tail tracks, and IIRC it was stated to have a capacity of 24TPH. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobtehpanda Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8902 Posted March 29, 2020 6 hours ago, LaGuardia Link N Tra said: So what you’re saying is that a De-Interlined QB (even with Lengthened trains and platforms along Williamsburg/Myrtle Line) is a Non-Starter? It's a nonstarter because the only transfer station is Roosevelt. Even today Roosevelt is already at peak standing capacity; you can't increase transfer volumes during the rush without having to start resorting to London Underground-style closing of exits and putting people in pens. Roosevelt's layout is particularly bad for wrong-direction platform changes. The definitely needs to go. But honestly, if 8th Av local and expresses are separated, the interlining would be between two track pairs, and that is honestly not the end of the world. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theli11 Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8903 Posted March 29, 2020 (edited) 30 minutes ago, bobtehpanda said: But honestly, if 8th Av local and expresses are separated, the interlining would be between two track pairs, and that is honestly not the end of the world. Can you clarify what you mean by this? I'm not as fluent. Edited March 29, 2020 by Theli11 Clarifying the Clarifying Question 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrsman Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8904 Posted March 29, 2020 Hmm, I think that bobthepanda is referring to the fact that if we kept the 36St merge, it is something that is workable, not ideal, but still workable. Are you envisioning something like this: Jamaica Center - QBL express - 53 St 179 - QBL express - 63 St Forest Hills - QBL local - 53 St Forest Hills - QBL local - 63 St This would mean that there would be merges of / and / in the outbound direction and a merge of and in the inbound direction at 36 St. But, depending on the service pattern, no other merges. and will be together along 53 and 8 Ave and both will either be 8th Ave locals that stop at WTC or 8th Ave expresses that continue through the Cranberry Tunnel. (I prefer the latter since the QBL service has higher demand than the CPW serivce, plus if and are both 8thAve-CPW locals, all 8th Ave trains can serve 50 St.) and will be together along 63 and 6 Ave local all the way to Broadway-Laffayette, where the two currently split between access to Culver or the Williamsburg Bridge. and will remain on the 6th Ave express, but their service pattern on CPW (whether express or local) will depend on the ervice pattern of and . My preference is for and to both be CPW expresses and to run more and , as and will be limited due to the WTC terminal. While I prefer a deinterlining of QBL, I think this is a good system. It separates QBL from Broadway and can be used to eliminate every other reverse merge along the IND. If this servce pattern were adopted, I believe that a Qboro Plaza- Q Plaza transfer would no longer be necessary as every QBL passenger can simply use the or if they want Broadway service and make a cross-platform transfer at 63/Lex to (and if that is also routed to 2 AV/96 St). An improved transfer from 63/Lex to 59/Lex is still necessary to provide a connection to the (and also the Broadway-60 St locals). So under the above system, take or if your destination is along 8th Ave or 53 St or most parts of Lower Manhattan. Use or with a transfer at 7 Ave if headed to CPW. Use or if headed to 6 Ave, Broadway [transfer at 63/Lex], or Lexington Ave. If your destination is along , it is a crapshoot, but and do have the connection at WTC-Park Place and possibly at Fulton Street that might be better than using to 14 St, especially if your destination along the is in Lower Manhattan or Brooklyn. [Of course if your destination is along 7 Ave in Midtown, take any train and just walk a block from either 6 Ave or 8 Ave.] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jova42R Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8905 Posted March 29, 2020 9 hours ago, Theli11 said: . Is the N running on 63 St or 60 St? If it's on 63, same thing as above, if it's on 60th, then it still has that dreaded 34 St merge, which you could solve by placing it on the Broadway local. Which would also help with the 4th Av Local service, which I'm.. confused about. If you run it on the 4th Av Local, you take it away from the bridge, and you have added 12 TPH from DeKalb - Canal St, then for it to go express, you have to move it to the express tracks right after the merge. A mess in and of itself. The line isn't the line to provide additional local service on weekdays, especially when you're making it as long as it is. If you wanted extra local service, you could've either, added more trains to run down the line like it does during Rush Hours, or Eliminated the (again) because where are you going to put it? Putting it on Astoria when it'll limit travel? 63rd and 4 Av Exp. Typo, sorry! Thoughts on my Jewel Av Line? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jova42R Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8906 Posted March 29, 2020 9 hours ago, Theli11 said: Is the N running on 63 St or 60 St? If it's on 63, same thing as above, if it's on 60th, then it still has that dreaded 34 St merge, which you could solve by placing it on the Broadway local. Which would also help with the 4th Av Local service, which I'm.. confused about. If you run it on the 4th Av Local, you take it away from the bridge, and you have added 12 TPH from DeKalb - Canal St, then for it to go express, you have to move it to the express tracks right after the merge. A mess in and of itself. The line isn't the line to provide additional local service on weekdays, especially when you're making it as long as it is. If you wanted extra local service, you could've either, added more trains to run down the line like it does during Rush Hours, or Eliminated the (again) because where are you going to put it? Putting it on Astoria when it'll limit travel? I meant: CONEY ISLAND - SEA BEACH LCL - 4 AV EXP - BWAY EXP - 63 ST - QBL LCL - JEWEL AV - FRESH MEADOWS Thoughts on my Jewel Av Line? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jova42R Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8907 Posted March 29, 2020 Here's my proposal for a Whitestone Line: SERVICE PATTERN During the off-peak and weekends, it is: 15TPH to Flushing 15TPH to Whitestone During the peak, it is: 10TPH to Flushing 10TPH to Whitestone 5TPH to Whitestone 5TPH to Flushing During the late nights, it is: 12TPH to Flushing 10TPH Flushing to Whitestone (turquoise ) ROUTE https://drive.google.com/open?id=1j9orLSQvatWLmff-bWbUMxZMxLJHlW1H&usp=sharing FLEET R188s from the STATION ALIGNMENTS Flushing-Main St made a 5-track station, outer 2 tracks are for s and Whitestone s Northern Blvd tunnel, 2 tracks, island platform Latimer Pl tunnel, 2 tracks, island platform Linden Pl tunnel, 2 tracks, island platform ENTERS I-678 MEDIAN JUST AFTER LINDEN PL 25 Av median of I-678, 2 tracks, island platform 20 Av median of I-678, 2 tracks, island platform 14 Av median of I-678, 2 tracks, island platform Whitestone-9 Av median of I-678, 3 tracks, island platforms Thoughts @KK 6 Ave Local @LaGuardia Link N Tra @mrsman @WillF40PH @Mnrr6131? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobtehpanda Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8908 Posted March 29, 2020 There's a reason why the Q44 uses Parsons even though that's slower than the service road. No one lives on the highway, and no one is interested in walking to the highway. Excessive stations. 25th Av doesn't need a station, and 9th Av doesn't need a station given that the area around it is extremely low density, and good luck even threading a subway through that highway interchange. Whitestone is also not a high priority for any subway extension. There is also not enough width in the highway ROW to put a rail line in as well, so it would require property takings and destruction of residential properties. Given those facts and the general reality that the Whitestone has been under construction for most of my waking life, I would oppose this. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KK 6 Ave Local Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8909 Posted March 29, 2020 3 hours ago, Jova42R said: Here's my proposal for a Whitestone Line: SERVICE PATTERN During the off-peak and weekends, it is: 15TPH to Flushing 15TPH to Whitestone During the peak, it is: 10TPH to Flushing 10TPH to Whitestone 5TPH to Whitestone 5TPH to Flushing During the late nights, it is: 12TPH to Flushing 10TPH Flushing to Whitestone (turquoise ) ROUTE https://drive.google.com/open?id=1j9orLSQvatWLmff-bWbUMxZMxLJHlW1H&usp=sharing FLEET R188s from the STATION ALIGNMENTS Flushing-Main St made a 5-track station, outer 2 tracks are for s and Whitestone s Northern Blvd tunnel, 2 tracks, island platform Latimer Pl tunnel, 2 tracks, island platform Linden Pl tunnel, 2 tracks, island platform ENTERS I-678 MEDIAN JUST AFTER LINDEN PL 25 Av median of I-678, 2 tracks, island platform 20 Av median of I-678, 2 tracks, island platform 14 Av median of I-678, 2 tracks, island platform Whitestone-9 Av median of I-678, 3 tracks, island platforms Thoughts @KK 6 Ave Local @LaGuardia Link N Tra @mrsman @WillF40PH @Mnrr6131? I'd have this as a light rail and then after Flushing it would continue down Main St to Jamaica. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theli11 Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8910 Posted March 29, 2020 4 hours ago, Jova42R said: Thoughts on my Jewel Av Line? It's fine, but I don't like Broadway on QB in general, it just ruins Queens Blvd. if you put the there, maybe. But then it has to be the only train terminating at Forest Hills for it to work without any delays coming onto the line. 28 minutes ago, KK 6 Ave Local said: During the peak, it is: 10TPH to Flushing 10TPH to Whitestone 5TPH to Whitestone 5TPH to Flushing Why not just call trains the , that way you can just have 2 service, rather than confusing passengers on 2 different terminals. the stays at Flushing, and the goes to Whitestone. I'll have to agree that you're putting a train in the middle of a highway is a bad idea, because then you'd have to weave through it. You'd probably want a better way to get to Whitestone via a more easier street. Parsons is too small so you'd probably have to go more east. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jova42R Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8911 Posted March 29, 2020 (edited) 36 minutes ago, KK 6 Ave Local said: I'd have this as a light rail and then after Flushing it would continue down Main St to Jamaica. Good idea. as @bobtehpanda pointed out, it wouldn't be feasible to have it in the highway median. So, I edited the map: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1j9orLSQvatWLmff-bWbUMxZMxLJHlW1H&usp=sharing 2 lines: (X) Whitestone-College Point Local / Main St Local (Y) Bayside Local / Main St Local Fleet: Siemens S70. @KK 6 Ave Local thoughts on the stations? Edited March 29, 2020 by Jova42R 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jova42R Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8912 Posted March 29, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Theli11 said: Why not just call trains the , that way you can just have 2 service, rather than confusing passengers on 2 different terminals. the stays at Flushing, and the goes to Whitestone. I'll have to agree that you're putting a train in the middle of a highway is a bad idea, because then you'd have to weave through it. You'd probably want a better way to get to Whitestone via a more easier street. Parsons is too small so you'd probably have to go more east. see my post above (post #8911) Edited March 29, 2020 by Jova42R 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KK 6 Ave Local Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8913 Posted March 29, 2020 11 minutes ago, Jova42R said: Good idea. as @bobtehpanda pointed out, it wouldn't be feasible to have it in the highway median. So, I edited the map: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1j9orLSQvatWLmff-bWbUMxZMxLJHlW1H&usp=sharing 2 lines: (X) Whitestone-College Point Local / Main St Local (Y) Bayside Local / Main St Local Fleet: Siemens S70. @KK 6 Ave Local thoughts on the stations? I like this idea. North parts of Queens could be well served with light rail. Only a short extension and Astoria - LIE line would really be needed for heavy rail at this point in time and that can just be an / extension. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jova42R Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8914 Posted March 29, 2020 10 minutes ago, KK 6 Ave Local said: I like this idea. North parts of Queens could be well served with light rail. Only a short extension and Astoria - LIE line would really be needed for heavy rail at this point in time and that can just be an / extension. Thanks! Would Fresh Meadows be better served by light rail as well? Maybe instead of a Forest Hills-Fresh Meadows line, there could be a Flushing-Fresh Meadows line. I think that we can provide 20TPH on the Jamaica-Flushing portion, and 10TPH on each branch w/o Fresh Meadows. With Fresh Meadows, 24TPH on the mainline, of which 12TPH each to Whitestone and Bayside, and 12TPH each to Fresh Meadows and Jamaica. Thoughts? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R32-DTrain Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8915 Posted March 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Jova42R said: Thanks! Would Fresh Meadows be better served by light rail as well? Maybe instead of a Forest Hills-Fresh Meadows line, there could be a Flushing-Fresh Meadows line. I think that we can provide 20TPH on the Jamaica-Flushing portion, and 10TPH on each branch w/o Fresh Meadows. With Fresh Meadows, 24TPH on the mainline, of which 12TPH each to Whitestone and Bayside, and 12TPH each to Fresh Meadows and Jamaica. Thoughts? 1 hour ago, KK 6 Ave Local said: I like this idea. North parts of Queens could be well served with light rail. Only a short extension and Astoria - LIE line would really be needed for heavy rail at this point in time and that can just be an / extension. I like the Fresh Meadows line. I think that a 15TPH on Whitestone/Bayside and 15TPH on Fresh Meadows/Jamaica and 30TPH on the mainline from Queens College to Jamaica. Could this work? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobtehpanda Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8916 Posted March 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Jova42R said: Good idea. as @bobtehpanda pointed out, it wouldn't be feasible to have it in the highway median. So, I edited the map: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1j9orLSQvatWLmff-bWbUMxZMxLJHlW1H&usp=sharing 2 lines: (X) Whitestone-College Point Local / Main St Local (Y) Bayside Local / Main St Local Fleet: Siemens S70. @KK 6 Ave Local thoughts on the stations? Why does the (Y) do that weird jog up north? Density is higher south of Northern Blvd than north of it; look how busy the Q27 is compared to the Q16. 2019 average weekday ridership (east-west buses, north to south order) Q16 - 3.9k Q28 - 8.9k Q13 - 7.4k Q12 - 10.1k Northern Blvd Q27 - 23k Q88 - 10.9k Q46 - 20k Q43 - 13.4k Coupled with population density, the next extensions in Queens are pretty obvious: to Broadway LIRR, with one stop replacing Murray Hill LIRR station alternatively, using city fares on the Port Washington branch to Springfield/Hillside to Springfield via Locust Manor branch of the LIRR alternatively, using city fares on the combined Long Beach/Far Rock/West Hempstead branches and moving all Babylon trains to the St. Albans branch Phase II, if the first phase gets built, would probably look like QBL local extension via Jewel and 73rd to 188th Astoria Blvd/Main St line 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jova42R Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8917 Posted March 29, 2020 2 minutes ago, bobtehpanda said: Why does the (Y) do that weird jog up north? Density is higher south of Northern Blvd than north of it; look how busy the Q27 is compared to the Q16. 2019 average weekday ridership (east-west buses, north to south order) Q16 - 3.9k Q28 - 8.9k Q13 - 7.4k Q12 - 10.1k Northern Blvd Q27 - 23k Q88 - 10.9k Q46 - 20k Q43 - 13.4k Coupled with population density, the next extensions in Queens are pretty obvious: to Broadway LIRR, with one stop replacing Murray Hill LIRR station alternatively, using city fares on the Port Washington branch to Springfield/Hillside to Springfield via Locust Manor branch of the LIRR alternatively, using city fares on the combined Long Beach/Far Rock/West Hempstead branches and moving all Babylon trains to the St. Albans branch Phase II, if the first phase gets built, would probably look like QBL local extension via Jewel and 73rd to 188th Astoria Blvd/Main St line Felt it was better to serve that area, I'll change the map That's my Jewel Av Line (See above) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theli11 Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8918 Posted March 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Jova42R said: That's my Jewel Av Line (See above) Didn't that run on the LIE for a couple of stops? Personally I wouldn't run any train station atop of a highway. Maybe right next to it like the does? It can go down Jewel, and end at 73 Av - 188 St. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collin Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8919 Posted March 29, 2020 I think the should have infill stations added at 10th Avenue as was originally planned, and at 2nd Avenue as part of Phase 3. That would eliminate the need build an extremely long underground passage to Grand Central that customers won't like anyways. The proposed transfer would be longer than going between Times Square and Port Authority Bus Terminal. This would also allow the to function better as a crosstown line. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jova42R Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8920 Posted March 29, 2020 (edited) 58 minutes ago, Theli11 said: Didn't that run on the LIE for a couple of stops? Personally I wouldn't run any train station atop of a highway. Maybe right next to it like the does? It can go down Jewel, and end at 73 Av - 188 St. Yes, it'd be a tunnel under the LIE, a viaduct would recieve mass opposition 22 minutes ago, Collin said: I think the should have infill stations added at 10th Avenue as was originally planned, and at 2nd Avenue as part of Phase 3. That would eliminate the need build an extremely long underground passage to Grand Central that customers won't like anyways. The proposed transfer would be longer than going between Times Square and Port Authority Bus Terminal. This would also allow the to function better as a crosstown line. I fully agree! Maybe also extend it to 26th St (at the end of the tail tracks)? Edited March 29, 2020 by Jova42R 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theli11 Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8921 Posted March 29, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Jova42R said: Yes, it'd be a tunnel under the LIE, a viaduct would recieve mass opposition Couldn't you just stay on Jewel Avenue and cut out the extra turning 7 minutes ago, Jova42R said: I fully agree! Maybe also extend it to 26th St (at the end of the tail tracks) You might as well end it at 23 St, or 10th Av - 14 St with an L extension. Edited March 29, 2020 by Theli11 extra quote that wasn't need. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jova42R Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8922 Posted March 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, Theli11 said: 1. Couldn't you just stay on Jewel Avenue and cut out the extra turning 2. You might as well end it at 23 St, or 10th Av - 14 St with an L extension. Yes, but then no direct Queens College service That would require boring tunnels which is super expensive. Better to just have a passageway to 23 St. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theli11 Posted March 29, 2020 Share #8923 Posted March 29, 2020 2 minutes ago, Jova42R said: Yes, but then no direct Queens College service That would require boring tunnels which is super expensive. Better to just have a passageway to 23 St. Kissena Blvd isn't enough to be near Queens College. It's at most a 3 minute walk. You don't even need it to be IN the college, it should be next to it. And on Kissena/Jewel it's pretty darn close. I guess 26 St would be suffice. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jova42R Posted March 30, 2020 Share #8924 Posted March 30, 2020 18 minutes ago, Theli11 said: Kissena Blvd isn't enough to be near Queens College. It's at most a 3 minute walk. You don't even need it to be IN the college, it should be next to it. And on Kissena/Jewel it's pretty darn close. True!! 18 minutes ago, Theli11 said: I guess 26 St would be suffice. In all truth, a 11-car platform would have its northern entrance on 27th, and southern on 25th, so 2 blocks to 23rd is nothing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collin Posted March 30, 2020 Share #8925 Posted March 30, 2020 I'm not sure a Jewel Ave line, or further branching off QB would be a good idea. It just reduces the number of trains that can go to the existing terminals and increases the number of merges. I think the city should explore the possibility of light rail in heavily trafficked corridors in the outer boroughs that aren't served by subway. They can achieve far higher capacity and speed compared to an SBS route, but can be built for a lot cheaper than a subway, even if partially underground. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.