trainfan22 Posted October 21, 2008 Share #1 Posted October 21, 2008 An line yuppie cought an R160 burn testing on the line. http://lostnewyorkcity.blogspot.com/2008/10/new-f-is-coming.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul P Posted October 21, 2008 Share #2 Posted October 21, 2008 yepp, it is happening, the new orders are coming in finally. hopefully this testing results good enough so it can run in revenue service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted October 21, 2008 Share #3 Posted October 21, 2008 lols... dat was abt a wk ago. yea... itz gunna b soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul P Posted October 21, 2008 Share #4 Posted October 21, 2008 I just like to see the comments on that blog, the ppl are excited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q43 Floral Park Posted October 21, 2008 Share #5 Posted October 21, 2008 "I'm so used to the "F" train being the neglected stepchild of the MTA" All I have to say is HUH?! The is far from neglect compared to the and Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted October 21, 2008 Share #6 Posted October 21, 2008 "I'm so used to the "F" train being the neglected stepchild of the MTA" All I have to say is HUH?! The is far from neglect compared to the and not even da ... at least it has more frequent service than the . the wen from 6 cars to 4 cars... got its queens stretch removed, its stations r rly shabby, nd if a train actually comes, ur in luck! who's da stepchild now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brighton Local Posted October 21, 2008 Share #7 Posted October 21, 2008 lols... dat was abt a wk ago. yea... itz gunna b soon. not even da ... at least it has more frequent service than the .the wen from 6 cars to 4 cars... got its queens stretch removed, its stations r rly shabby, nd if a train actually comes, ur in luck! who's da stepchild now? Dude, good points, However, please type in English, not slang.. The 160s look sweet on the ! Culver/6 Av Local Queens Bl Exp Jamaica-179 St Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted October 21, 2008 Share #8 Posted October 21, 2008 Dude, good points, However, please type in English, not slang.. The 160s look sweet on the ! Culver/6 Av Local Queens Bl Exp Jamaica-179 St 2 lazy 2 write da whole wrd out sumtimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Julio Posted October 21, 2008 Share #9 Posted October 21, 2008 "I'm so used to the "F" train being the neglected stepchild of the MTA" All I have to say is HUH?! The is far from neglect compared to the and This is Park Slope yuppies we are talking about. If it's something that isn't benefiting them, it's "neglecting" them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted October 21, 2008 Share #10 Posted October 21, 2008 This is Park Slope yuppies we are talking about. If it's something that isn't benefiting them, it's "neglecting" them. good post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1447 Posted October 21, 2008 Share #11 Posted October 21, 2008 2 lazy 2 write da whole wrd out sumtimes. nah its because u u wanna be street im guessing, its easy to write English man, I cant even read what the heck or saying... just type regular, slangs for IM, if you get a job, and write slang they wont accept you, nothing against u, is just that I dislike people using slang, cuz its sometimes disrespectful and unable to read, im not a street, ghetto person, nor I slang, but just helping fine thx As for the Im sorry, but the R46 fits it completly, give the 160s to some other route, maybe the would do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted October 21, 2008 Share #12 Posted October 21, 2008 nah its because u u wanna be street, its easy to write English man, I cant even read what the heck or saying... just type regular, slangs for IM, thx As for the Im sorry, but the R46 fits it completly, give the 160s to some other route, maybe the would do lol. i'd say the , since it is based out of jam. yard. and it has been running 32s nd now 42s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1447 Posted October 21, 2008 Share #13 Posted October 21, 2008 lol.i'd say the , since it is based out of jam. yard. and it has been running 32s nd now 42s. o i corrected my post, didnt want u thinking i have sumin against u, just trying to help and nah the goes with 3s, for the heck of it, everythings fine, even the 160s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N-Trizzy2609 Posted October 22, 2008 Share #14 Posted October 22, 2008 Gia showed those pics, all I can say is yey!!! But that means no more R32s on the . At least they are bringing something good insted of more stupid rusty 42's. Think how nice those 160s would look pulling around that curve at Smith-9th Street. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted October 22, 2008 Share #15 Posted October 22, 2008 o i corrected my post, didnt want u thinking i have sumin against u, just trying to help and nah the goes with 3s, for the heck of it, everythings fine, even the 160s nah, no worries about your post. eh, are the phase 1s really going to drown in december? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayBuffer Posted October 22, 2008 Share #16 Posted October 22, 2008 LOL. These people are so stupid on that blog and most others like it which complain about everything in NYC and their neighborhood since they moved here from Michigan or wherever they came from. And they NEVER fail to make a bad comparison to something they saw on a vacation to Paris or London in those Metros. They never stop complaining while other New Yorkers along most other lines don't seem to b*tch everyday about what are sometimes worse conditions than R-46 (F)s. I hope they enjoy their 160s. I bet pretty soon they're going to be complaining about them too if the FINDs aren't 100% perfect and say they got cheated by the again. B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R32 3348 Posted October 22, 2008 Share #17 Posted October 22, 2008 nah, no worries about your post.eh, are the phase 1s really going to drown in december? There is no way 291 Phase I cars are going to be gone in a month...I think they'll start to go by the masses in late November, and also it'll probably get delayed by 2-3 months since the T/A will probably spend time organizing plans, etc. Also, slants have completely stopped being scrapped since the R32s started going... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubwayGuy Posted October 23, 2008 Share #18 Posted October 23, 2008 There is no way 291 Phase I cars are going to be gone in a month...I think they'll start to go by the masses in late November, and also it'll probably get delayed by 2-3 months since the T/A will probably spend time organizing plans, etc. Also, slants have completely stopped being scrapped since the R32s started going... I'm guessing they were getting rid of the worst performing cars first, which is why they're going "out of order" with the reefings but I don't know for a fact... As for R160's, it'd be nice if they went to the next, but no telling. I'm guessing if that happened it'd mean finally seeing R40M/R42's on the , particularly since C/R boards might be starting to pop out over on 8th ave... As for yuppies, all yuppies like to do is personify trains by acting like they're in a relationship with them "oh R train you're like a bad girl/boyfriend, always cheating on me, well now I'm going to cheat on you with the N" and other stupid statements...and they LOVE to complain when they're late or have old cars, that's just the nature of yuppies nothing you can do to change it just laugh at 'em and maybe someday they'll get the point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlmerPark B6 Posted October 23, 2008 Share #19 Posted October 23, 2008 I'm guessing they were getting rid of the worst performing cars first, which is why they're going "out of order" with the reefings but I don't know for a fact... As for R160's, it'd be nice if they went to the next, but no telling. I'm guessing if that happened it'd mean finally seeing R40M/R42's on the , particularly since C/R boards might be starting to pop out over on 8th ave... As for yuppies, all yuppies like to do is personify trains by acting like they're in a relationship with them "oh R train you're like a bad girl/boyfriend, always cheating on me, well now I'm going to cheat on you with the N" and other stupid statements...and they LOVE to complain when they're late or have old cars, that's just the nature of yuppies nothing you can do to change it just laugh at 'em and maybe someday they'll get the point B) The should get R160s. The shouldn't run exclusivly R160s. Looks too classic and they hog up all the R160!!! OMG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7LineFan Posted October 25, 2008 Share #20 Posted October 25, 2008 The should get R160s. The shouldn't run exclusivly R160s. Looks too classic and they hog up all the R160!!! OMG I agree with your statement. As good as the old cars are, something new on the would be really great. And the doesn't run exclusively R160... caught an R68/A this morning. It's only a few sets though. Whaddya mean by classic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlmerPark B6 Posted October 25, 2008 Share #21 Posted October 25, 2008 I agree with your statement. As good as the old cars are, something new on the would be really great. And the doesn't run exclusively R160... caught an R68/A this morning. It's only a few sets though. Whaddya mean by classic? i meant that i like the old days like R68 on the . Soon it would run exclusively R160s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.