4P3607 Posted January 10, 2011 Share #26 Posted January 10, 2011 You guys are accusing someone of doing something ILLEGAL.By saying this stuff in the open these can FU*K up the community even more.It is what it is.He got shots of an R-68 with an rollsign.So what if it wasn't the real deal or not its there done.This could had been a very neat photoshop. this was not photoshop. He showed me the photos when I ran into him on his camera! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2 Train Master Posted January 10, 2011 Share #27 Posted January 10, 2011 Word. I can't thank you enough for this. Making those false accusations without any knowledge is a big no-no. It will make yourself look even more of a bigger dumbass to the rest of the community. I mean come on. 1.A T/O could had changed it and not changed it back 2.It can be a very very neat photoshop 3.If he went in the cab so WHAT,you mad you didn't have the guts to do so it is a risk but it is what it is. 4.Accusing someone of changing the signs in the cab mhhmm...thats wonderful how people are blowing the shit up this can **** up the community.Suppose a high MTA worker sees this and reports railfans are breaking into cabs,changing signs or whatever and we can't take pics/vids anymore.It won't be there fault it'll be the person(s) fault who said something out in the open. Just leave it alone he got shots & a vid of Shitcan with a rollsign.It's history the sign should be changed back anyways by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted January 10, 2011 Share #28 Posted January 10, 2011 I mean come on.1.A T/O could had changed it and not changed it back 2.It can be a very very neat photoshop 3.If he went in the cab so WHAT,you mad you didn't have the guts to do so it is a risk but it is what it is. 4.Accusing someone of changing the signs in the cab mhhmm...thats wonderful how people are blowing the shit up this can **** up the community.Suppose a high MTA worker sees this and reports railfans are breaking into cabs,changing signs or whatever and we can't take pics/vids anymore.It won't be there fault it'll be the person(s) fault who said something out in the open. Just leave it alone he got shots & a vid of Shitcan with a rollsign.It's history the sign should be changed back anyways by now. Trust me, they read this site and subtalk all the time. They even know who the trouble makers are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
553 Bridgeton Posted January 10, 2011 Share #29 Posted January 10, 2011 Nice try tho.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Beach Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share #30 Posted January 10, 2011 How can someone switch the roll sign without a key? Some T/Os play with the signs just for the hell of it. You guys are accusing someone of doing something ILLEGAL.By saying this stuff in the open these can FU*K up the community even more.It is what it is.He got shots of an R-68 with an rollsign.So what if it wasn't the real deal or not its there done.This could had been a very neat photoshop. Word. I can't thank you enough for this. Making those false accusations without any knowledge is a big no-no. It will make yourself look even more of a bigger dumbass to the rest of the community. Yes You showed me the photos when I met you. There were 3 R68A Trains in a row running today as well, & I saw an R68 go to 57 Street-7 Avenue (It was at Canal Street and the signs said Midtown-57 Street, Manhattan). this was not photoshop. He showed me the photos when I ran into him on his camera! I mean come on.1.A T/O could had changed it and not changed it back 2.It can be a very very neat photoshop 3.If he went in the cab so WHAT,you mad you didn't have the guts to do so it is a risk but it is what it is. 4.Accusing someone of changing the signs in the cab mhhmm...thats wonderful how people are blowing the shit up this can **** up the community.Suppose a high MTA worker sees this and reports railfans are breaking into cabs,changing signs or whatever and we can't take pics/vids anymore.It won't be there fault it'll be the person(s) fault who said something out in the open. Just leave it alone he got shots & a vid of Shitcan with a rollsign.It's history the sign should be changed back anyways by now. You all couldnt have said this any better. Its ashame how people can judge and assume things, but anyways, back on topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2 Train Master Posted January 10, 2011 Share #31 Posted January 10, 2011 Trust me, they read this site and subtalk all the time. They even know who the trouble makers are. Yea I know they know whats going on.The stuff WE as a community on this site say may change their minds about things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Beach Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share #32 Posted January 10, 2011 Trust me, they read this site and subtalk all the time. They even know who the trouble makers are. God bless them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4P3607 Posted January 10, 2011 Share #33 Posted January 10, 2011 Why did you include my posts in there? thats the best I could have said a Train going to 57 Street! :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Beach Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share #34 Posted January 10, 2011 Why did you include my posts in there? thats the best I could have said a Train going to 57 Street! :laugh: My bad, but that to 57 had all its signs to 57/7? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted January 10, 2011 Share #35 Posted January 10, 2011 Yea I know they know whats going on. The stuff WE as a community on this site say may change their minds about things. They know which people are doing the dumb things out there like playing with signs or taking photos where they shouldn't be. There isn't much that could be done at this point to change they way many of the higher ups feel, which was only made worse by certain things that happened of ever the last few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted January 10, 2011 Share #36 Posted January 10, 2011 My bad, but that to 57 had all its signs to 57/7? T/Os are not supposed to resign their trains when they get rerouted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queens Surface Posted January 10, 2011 Share #37 Posted January 10, 2011 Railfans these days, It's the reason why I do not hang around alot of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Beach Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share #38 Posted January 10, 2011 T/Os are not supposed to resign their trains when they get rerouted. Wow, I never knew that, on R160's you see that alot! Sometimes when the or goes via West End I see them signing the train up as a (D)elta.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1447 Posted January 10, 2011 Share #39 Posted January 10, 2011 Trust me, they read this site and subtalk all the time. They even know who the trouble makers are. Oh yes, they are watching us.. In 2010, Harry linked me to a PDF document from NYC DOT, which contained some of my bus photos and linked to NYCTF.. http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/dot/downloads/pdf/34thst_aa_chap6_references.pdf Page 6-1 u will see NYCTFs url.. Everyones gotta be careful... becuz someday a ban on photography will go on, and/or will bring in something against rail/bus buffs within there system. This is why i dont fan NYC Subway as much... To much junk going on. =_= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2 Train Master Posted January 10, 2011 Share #40 Posted January 10, 2011 T/Os are not supposed to resign their trains when they get rerouted. That excludes the NTT's since its easy to reprogram.If not then idk. Railfans these days, It's the reason why I do not hang around alot of them. Same here a lot are all f'ked up in this community from being weird to having a foaming problem all kind of s**t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted January 10, 2011 Share #41 Posted January 10, 2011 Wow, I never knew that, on R160's you see that alot! Sometimes when the or goes via West End I see them signing the train up as a (D)elta.... That excludes the NTT's since its easy to reprogram. If not then idk. It was a recent directive, even on R160s they don't want the train resigned. That means if a ( gets sent over the to Stillwell, it stays as a but if there is a program for the via the that's ok. But they don't want an train going over the West End signed up as a . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ MC Posted January 10, 2011 Share #42 Posted January 10, 2011 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2 Train Master Posted January 10, 2011 Share #43 Posted January 10, 2011 It was a recent directive, even on R160s they don't want the train resigned. That means if a ( gets sent over the to Stillwell, it stays as a but if there is a program for the via the that's ok. But they don't want an train going over the West End signed up as a . Mhmm...I don't see why.Like before R160 re-routed via CPW no one caught a re-programmed to a . or via West End to Coney is better off being reprogrammed . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted January 10, 2011 Share #44 Posted January 10, 2011 Mhmm...I don't see why.Like before R160 re-routed via CPW no one caught a re-programmed to a . or via West End to Coney is better off being reprogrammed . Again, like I said before, this was a recent development and it came down from the top. It doesn't have to make sense to you or anyone else, it's what they want and it's something that is not open to interpretation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cait Sith Posted January 10, 2011 Share #45 Posted January 10, 2011 It was a recent directive, even on R160s they don't want the train resigned. That means if a ( gets sent over the to Stillwell, it stays as a but if there is a program for the via the that's ok. But they don't want an train going over the West End signed up as a . Interesting, does this have to do with Car Assignments as well? Like as the & has specific bunches of 160s, they wouldnt want to see it changed to another route? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted January 10, 2011 Share #46 Posted January 10, 2011 Interesting, does this have to do with Car Assignments as well? Like as the & has specific bunches of 160s, they wouldnt want to see it changed to another route? I don't really know, I know the line supt. flipped out when rerouted trains came into Stillwell signed up as a . Other then that I don't know the reason, but like many things in the TA, who needs a reason for anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rr4567 Posted January 10, 2011 Share #47 Posted January 10, 2011 While I'm a bit skeptical about the whole F thing myself, they are good photos. HA! Phil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted January 10, 2011 Share #48 Posted January 10, 2011 While I'm a bit skeptical about the whole F thing myself, they are good photos. HA! Phil Yoooo Phil! Give it up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4P3607 Posted January 10, 2011 Share #49 Posted January 10, 2011 My bad, but that to 57 had all its signs to 57/7? yes. I couldnt see all of them but all the signs I saw said 57 Street.:cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
553 Bridgeton Posted January 10, 2011 Share #50 Posted January 10, 2011 All im saying its sad what these railfans do. They go to great lengths to get a pic of a train and do stupid things to get the shot. It doesnt make any sense what so ever, and I dont understand it. Maybe they want to be cool, but what was accomplished? Nothing, but "oh great shot". This is why alot of T/Os bash out on railfans and I dont blame them. Why cant these foamers just take the shot and move on. It is so sad. There are females out there, and a whole lot of things out there to do. Get a job, find friends ect ect. Its a train for crying out loud. I know alot of railfans that are not this way. It just doesnt make any sense, and its sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.