BM5 via Woodhaven 5,156 #1 Posted June 25, 2012 (edited) Free WiFi is available through September 7 in six subway stations in Manhattan's Chelsea neighborhood. The pioneering project – sponsored by Google offers and provided by Boingo Wireless – keeps New York straphangers connected to the latest news, information and fun and is part of Transit Wireless's contract with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to provide wireless service in 270 underground subway stations, including both cellular DAS networks and Wi-Fi infrastructure. Riders can maintain their digital lifestyle – connecting to the Internet with smartphones, tablets, e-readers and other wireless devices while waiting for a train at six Chelsea stations. Users should look for the "Free Boingo WiFi" SSID to make sure they're connecting to the official subway network. In 2012, cell phone, data and Wi-Fi access from Transit Wireless and Boingo will expand to 30 additional stations on Manhattan's West Side, including Times Square, Rockefeller Center and Columbus Circle. Wireless services ultimately will be available to 1.6 billion annual riders at more than 270 underground stations throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn, The Bronx and Queens. The subway system would become New York City's largest Wi-Fi hotzone and each underground station will serve as a digital oasis where riders can find reliable, easy-to-use Internet access. "We're glad our riders will be able to access free WiFi this summer in six subway stations to stay connected while they're underground," said MTA Director of Strategic Initiatives Jerome Page. "Reliable WiFi underground is an important benefit for straphangers in New York City subway stations." Subway stations where Wi-Fi is available are: at 14 St at 8 Av at 23 St at 14 St at 14 St at 6 Av Under agreements with the MTA and Transit Wireless, AT&T and T-Mobile customers can now use their cell phones and also send and receive wireless data messages from these stations. As part of the service, E911 also provides added security underground with uninterrupted access to 911 and the ability for 911 dispatchers to know when a call is being placed at street level or underground in the subway. Wi-Fi has started at these stations and it has proved successful. Edited June 25, 2012 by Q23 Central Term Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VWM 404 #2 Posted June 25, 2012 (edited) Boingo sucks raw ass. It sucks at JFK and everywhere I've used it. Edited June 25, 2012 by VWM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
B3 Via Av U 178 #3 Posted June 25, 2012 Boingo sucks raw ass. It sucks at JFK and everywhere I've used it. Of course they would choose them! They choose the cheapest service avalible, and then the customers complain that it sucks, then the dosen't give a damn about it because they have "more important matters to handle." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Orion VII 4 Life 1,062 #4 Posted June 25, 2012 Nice! Hopefully they get Sprint cell service in the stations next or soon, since I have Sprint, but I think it makes more sense for them to be focusing on getting Verizon next. Most people use Verizon for wireless, I don't get why they didn't try to get their network installed first instead of AT&T & T-Mobile. Boingo sucks raw ass. It sucks at JFK and everywhere I've used it. Yeah, I agree, especially considering that you actually have to pay for it at the airports. Is the Port Authority so damn cheap that they can't have free wi-fi like almost every other airport I've been to? Thankfully JFK Terminal 5 (the JetBlue terminal) has a separate and free wi-fi service, and I fly JetBlue a lot. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R110B 5 #5 Posted June 25, 2012 Nice! Hopefully they get Sprint cell service in the stations next or soon, since I have Sprint, but I think it makes more sense for them to be focusing on getting Verizon next. Most people use Verizon for wireless, I don't get why they didn't try to get their network installed first instead of AT&T & T-Mobile. Yeah, I agree, especially considering that you actually have to pay for it at the airports. Is the Port Authority so damn cheap that they can't have free wi-fi like almost every other airport I've been to? Thankfully JFK Terminal 5 (the JetBlue terminal) has a separate and free wi-fi service, and I fly JetBlue a lot. why because its easier for them to use gsm networks before than to get wcdm networks which takes time to do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eric B 1,028 #6 Posted June 26, 2012 I just noticed the blue WiFi stickers on the columns at the 14th St. platform! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tokkemon 448 #7 Posted June 26, 2012 I was wondering why I could get cell reception on the at 8th Ave. I guess this explains it! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mark1447 685 #8 Posted June 27, 2012 If you wanna boost your Wireless Connection, just look for these babies in the ceiling. This is the Wireless Router. I noticed I passed these and the signal boosted, plus the labeling on one of the pipes.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FriedChikkin 160 #9 Posted June 27, 2012 The only addition to what they've had/been testing since last year is 23rd Street ... I'm always reminded where I'm at when I roll into one of these stations and my phone starts getting text messages. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
QM1to6Ave 1,690 #10 Posted June 28, 2012 I have verizon, so I can't comment on the phone reception, but the wifi sucks in these stations. This is not new info- the wifi has been in place for a while, and I have tried it on the platforms at 14th street and the at 14th--the signal will show up, but I can never actually connect to a website. Also, I just love how the MTA has all the "keep electronics hidden to prevent robberies" campaigns while installing wifi, which will...get more people to pull out their electronic devices. Real intelligent. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Y2Julio 206 #11 Posted June 29, 2012 Of course they would choose them! They choose the cheapest service avalible, and then the customers complain that it sucks, then the dosen't give a damn about it because they have "more important matters to handle." If I recall correctly, the MTA isn't paying for it. The Wi-Fi provider is paying for the installation. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jamaica Line 150 #12 Posted June 29, 2012 The only addition to what they've had/been testing since last year is 23rd Street ... I'm always reminded where I'm at when I roll into one of these stations and my phone starts getting text messages. I'm writing you up for having your phone on while on duty. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Y2Julio 206 #13 Posted June 29, 2012 I'm writing you up for having your phone on while on duty. Who said he was on duty? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jamaica Line 150 #14 Posted June 29, 2012 Who said he was on duty? *sigh* True, true... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites