Kingsbridgeviewer382 Posted April 13 Share #5526 Posted April 13 6 minutes ago, NYC Bus Roster said: When was 1200 scrapped? I still have 1200 in service at KB. 1201, 1205, 1212, 1224, 1246, 1248-1249 & 1271 were at ECH Scrap. 1200 was also at Eastchester scrap since April of last year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MysteriousBtrain Posted April 13 Share #5527 Posted April 13 On 4/11/2024 at 10:29 PM, Kingsbridgeviewer382 said: That user was not referring to where the bus currently operates. They're arguing that 4630 was the highest numbered 2009 model of the NG hybrids. As for the debate at hand, I remember TTMG and other older rosters categorizing the 4600s at JFK as 2010 models in their old roster pages for years. Most sites, including mine, followed that piece of info for years. Now TransitMan is stating that only 4656-onwards are the only 2010 models. It would be nice to see a definitive clarfication, though that in itself is a rather small and somewhat insignificant thing to argue about. For clarification purposes, 4631-4655 are 2010 units built in 2009. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSMG106 Posted April 13 Share #5528 Posted April 13 4173: JFK to Eastchester scrap. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toro Posted April 14 Share #5529 Posted April 14 When was 3522s last day of service? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calvin Posted April 14 Share #5530 Posted April 14 (edited) 30 minutes ago, toro said: When was 3522s last day of service? November 15th, end of AM rush. 5 months ago. Edited April 14 by Calvin 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The TransitMan Posted April 14 Author Share #5531 Posted April 14 On 4/11/2024 at 5:00 PM, RSMG106 said: 4149, 4168: JFK to Eastchester scrap. 4146 at JFK has been confirmed to be retired. On 4/11/2024 at 9:20 PM, Calvin said: 4445: LGA to JFK, now scrap to Eastchester On 4/12/2024 at 9:13 PM, Calvin said: 4149, 4164: JFK to scrap at Eastchester On 4/12/2024 at 10:03 PM, TyBusLover1 said: 4202: Retired at JFK according to @SevenEleven. On 4/13/2024 at 12:21 AM, RSMG106 said: 4233: JFK to Eastchester scrap. 2483 from Ulmer Park, 3082 and 3186 from Yonkers, 3310-3311 from College Point, and 4140 from JFK are undergoing long-term maintenance. 3594: LaGuardia to Gershow Recycling Corporation in Nassau County 3763: JFK to Gershow Recycling Corporation in Nassau County 3661, 3695, 3808, 3814, 3822, 4037, 4081 from JFK, and 4582 from LaGuardia are in preparation to be sent to Gershow for scrap. 16 hours ago, RSMG106 said: 4173: JFK to Eastchester scrap. Greetings! The FIRST PAGE has been updated! Submitted for your approval! Enjoy! Also, has #4345 been saved for Zerega? If not, then I'll add it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TyBusLover1 Posted April 14 Share #5532 Posted April 14 13 minutes ago, The TransitMan said: Greetings! The FIRST PAGE has been updated! Submitted for your approval! Enjoy! Also, has #4345 been saved for Zerega? If not, then I'll add it. Yes I believe it has. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSMG106 Posted April 14 Share #5533 Posted April 14 (edited) 4108: JFK to Zerega (To become a training bus) Edited April 14 by RSMG106 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TransitMan0251 Posted April 14 Share #5534 Posted April 14 1 hour ago, RSMG106 said: 4108: JFK to Zerega (To become a training bus) 4108 is actually currently at LGA 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawrence St Posted April 15 Share #5535 Posted April 15 I think we need to have reliable poster roles in threads like this. Far to many times has someone falsely reported a bus retired or somewhere it shouldn’t be. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawrence St Posted April 15 Share #5536 Posted April 15 3 hours ago, Lawrence St said: I think we need to have reliable poster roles in threads like this. Far to many times has someone falsely reported a bus retired or somewhere it shouldn’t be. @Cait Sith would something like this be possible? Where select roles can only respond to certain threads? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MysteriousBtrain Posted April 15 Share #5537 Posted April 15 There is literally no reason to assign posters just because someone posts something false. 1. Buses move in and out of retirement all the time 2. Mistakes happen 3. When you keep being told something isn't confirmed retired because of certain things it should be common sense it isn't And quite frankly imo there's no difference between a bus at Zerega or Eastchester besides the fact that one houses pending scrap and the other holds new or oos/training buses. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poopybutt123 Posted April 15 Share #5538 Posted April 15 9 minutes ago, MysteriousBtrain said: There is literally no reason to assign posters just because someone posts something false. 1. Buses move in and out of retirement all the time 2. Mistakes happen 3. When you keep being told something isn't confirmed retired because of certain things it should be common sense it isn't And quite frankly imo there's no difference between a bus at Zerega or Eastchester besides the fact that one houses pending scrap and the other holds new or oos/training buses. Right. We all need to learn from our mistakes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poopybutt123 Posted April 15 Share #5539 Posted April 15 4052 Baisley Park has gotten into an accident on the Q110 involving a truck. Credit to the original owner 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSMG106 Posted April 15 Share #5540 Posted April 15 37 minutes ago, poopybutt123 said: 4052 Baisley Park has gotten into an accident on the Q110 involving a truck. Credit to the original owner I could see this unit retired as a result of that accident. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poopybutt123 Posted April 15 Share #5541 Posted April 15 52 minutes ago, RSMG106 said: I could see this unit retired as a result of that accident. Same, These NGs at baisley are nothing but surplus buses 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingsbridgeviewer382 Posted April 15 Share #5542 Posted April 15 18 minutes ago, poopybutt123 said: Same, These NGs at baisley are nothing but surplus buses They are essential to the operations there as they only have 34 Novas there, so service would be extremely screwed if the 12 Orions were to go at once with no replacements. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poopybutt123 Posted April 15 Share #5543 Posted April 15 Just now, Kingsbridgeviewer382 said: They are essential to the operations there as they only have 34 Novas there, so service would be extremely screwed if the 12 Orions were to go at once with no replacements. so is BP repairing 4052? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingsbridgeviewer382 Posted April 15 Share #5544 Posted April 15 Just now, poopybutt123 said: so is BP repairing 4052? No idea. The accident was this morning so just wait a bit for someone with the actual info to come forward with it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calvin Posted April 15 Share #5545 Posted April 15 (edited) I know at certain times that a move that a user can post is false, heck, I know I'm part of this in the past. But, when you get told in previous posts that a certain bus isn't retired or so, I think they'll know by now what not to do. If a bus is said as retired but next day later it's back on the road, I can consider that 100% as false. Sometimes, a certain unit is said as a mistake, it's a reminder, think and look carefully next time you post because you get only 1 hour to edit. Buses retired ended up at Zerega, like @MysteriousBtrain said between ECH scrap, it's no problem, just a similarity that it's not mistaken as a out of service unit in passenger service (unless it's subject to change like 4378 and 4582). I can understand false moves being brought up but, for instance, if it's daily and happening a lot, I can see that as a very big problem and headaches to the first page update. But, even though it's brought up not to post anything false, it's worse when users bring your name up for a report history like "he posts or repeats garbage all the time". Tbh, some repeats are mentioned so, that it's understandable that when a certain unit is said as retired, it's at ECH scrap as removal from passenger service. This doesn't make you better than others but is worse criticism if your telling him that you posting mistakes is a complete waste that shouldn't belong here. Everyone should have respect towards others (even if you don't like others on the outside). If you have something bad to say, keep it to yourself. I put this out because in reality, if that person felt upset about a bad reputation, you can have this feeling for others on what they went through and how to do better in the future. Edited April 15 by Calvin 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYC Bus Roster Posted April 16 Share #5546 Posted April 16 8 hours ago, poopybutt123 said: so is BP repairing 4052? I'd doubt it. It may become a parts bus. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poopybutt123 Posted April 17 Share #5547 Posted April 17 On 4/14/2024 at 7:59 PM, TransitMan0251 said: 4108 is actually currently at LGA Is it still at LGA 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLX9304 Posted April 17 Share #5548 Posted April 17 On 4/15/2024 at 5:01 PM, Kingsbridgeviewer382 said: No idea. The accident was this morning so just wait a bit for someone with the actual info to come forward with it. But it also depends on the need of this bus. If the accident was minor, then yes, bus can be repairable and return to service when deemed operational. That’s up to the depot’s maintenance crews and the dispatcher. If the bus is not, then this bus will be used for parts once a second used bus arrives at the depot within the time of call. But since this bus is 16 years old, then it’s time to go. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TyBusLover1 Posted April 17 Share #5549 Posted April 17 1 hour ago, FLX9304 said: But it also depends on the need of this bus. If the accident was minor, then yes, bus can be repairable and return to service when deemed operational. That’s up to the depot’s maintenance crews and the dispatcher. If the bus is not, then this bus will be used for parts once a second used bus arrives at the depot within the time of call. But since this bus is 16 years old, then it’s time to go. I agree, but 4052 a 2009 model making it 15 years old this year. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TyBusLover1 Posted April 17 Share #5550 Posted April 17 50 minutes ago, TyBusLover1 said: I agree, but 4052 a 2009 model making it 15 years old this year. *is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.