Jump to content

SUBWAY - Random Thoughts Topic


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 30.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The (C) is already a vintage line the way I see it. 

You raise an excellent point, but I do believe this was more in reference to non revenue equipment.

 

Sure the R32's are older than shit but they're on that line every damn day.

Since 1932.

No, it's only no that it's running crappy equipment.

 

The whole point was vintage equipment would be better than the food cans they have now, unless some where actually serious.

Edited by Turbo19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because automobiles are not transit vehicles? That's like saying 'I hate food ads at restaurants.'

I think what hes saying is advertising a car on a train is weird because their advertising you to buy a car, looking at how good a car is, on a train car. When you think about, seems like somewhat of a weird senerio. Riding the train, but seeing a good looking car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For obvious reasons I've always detested auto ads on transit vehicles. It's very contradicting.

 

If it's any consolation, one of the new Nissan ads has a car driving onto the roof of a passing subway train to bypass traffic :P

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Does anyone know what font was used in the 1959 Salomon transit map?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was on a R68 (N) today for the first time in a long time and I take it everyday wonder why that is.

 

Well there you go, I could have sworn I saw one going the opposite way as me on the (R) this evening but it was like an "I can't be sure" sort of thing. The side ribbing looked different than an R46, and there are remarkably few 46's on the R these days.  Guess I might not have been wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what hes saying is advertising a car on a train is weird because their advertising you to buy a car, looking at how good a car is, on a train car. When you think about, seems like somewhat of a weird senerio. Riding the train, but seeing a good looking car.

 

Okay, with this, I take back my original statement. I failed to see this reason for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what hes saying is advertising a car on a train is weird because their advertising you to buy a car, looking at how good a car is, on a train car. When you think about, seems like somewhat of a weird senerio. Riding the train, but seeing a good looking car.

Right on the money.

 

If it's any consolation, one of the new Nissan ads has a car driving onto the roof of a passing subway train to bypass traffic :P

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Does anyone know what font was used in the 1959 Salomon transit map?

Why? Damn you Nissan.

 

And I unfortunately don't have an answer for your question.

 

Okay, with this, I take back my original statement. I failed to see this reason for some reason.

I'm not that much of a hater after all. I'm all for public transit, but shit, I'd be lying if I said I never considered owning a car for leisure purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh gawd no! They are starting to ad wrap my R160's? The bastards!

 

 

But you would not object to a Victoria's Secret wrap, would you?

 

Yes even if it was a Victoria Secret Microsoft or T-Mobile wrap ad etc etc of course I would be opposed to it. Call me a foamer (and thanks for the compliment) but I dont like the idea of commercialism taking over the system to the point that we have NTTs rolling rolling rollin like mobile billboards.

 

As another fellow member said it takes away from the awesomeness of the subway cars. If I want to look for ads for phat sports cars (like I got the money), or the latest smartphones, or a buy a sexy piece of lingerie for my sexy lovely kittens to wear in the bedroom for me, or get the scoop on the next shit sitcom  I can google it or get it in the newspaper, thats all there is to it. I don't need Windows 8 wrap ads thrown on my face on an R142 or an R160 in this case to be in the know that a new product is out. Oh man, whats next? Wrap ads on the R188's?

 

Yeah what was the opposing arguement again before anyone asks? hey realizm then if you dont like it, then pay for operational costs with an extra 25 cents added to the fare with the next fare hike to pay for keeping the system in good working order blah blah played out arguement please. Ok I sure got an answer,  the answer is tell Albany get off their asses and give the MTA a break already with more funding and tell Pendergrast to stop the financial commitee to mismanage the funds. There.

Edited by realizm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes even if it was a Victoria Secret Microsoft or T-Mobile wrap ad etc etc of course I would be opposed to it. Call me a foamer (and thanks for the compliment) but I dont like the idea of commercialism taking over the system to the point that we have NTTs rolling rolling rollin like mobile billboards.

 

As another fellow member said it takes away from the awesomeness of the subway cars. If I want to look for ads for phat sports cars (like I got the money), or the latest smartphones, or a buy a sexy piece of lingerie for my sexy lovely kittens to wear in the bedroom for me, or get the scoop on the next shit sitcom I can google it or get it in the newspaper, thats all there is to it. I don't need Windows 8 wrap ads thrown on my face on an R142 or an R160 in this case to be in the know that a new product is out. Oh man, whats next? Wrap ads on the R188's?

 

Yeah what was the opposing arguement again before anyone asks? hey realizm then if you dont like it, then pay for operational costs with an extra 25 cents added to the fare with the next fare hike to pay for keeping the system in good working order blah blah played out arguement please. Ok I sure got an answer, the answer is tell Albany get off their asses and give the MTA a break already with more funding and tell Pendergrast to stop the financial commitee to mismanage the funds. There.

Its their trains, they can do whatever the hell they wanna do with them, its bringing in some kind of extra income dir them, if you don't like it, you better start walking

 

...there you go lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its their trains, they can do whatever the hell they wanna do with them, its bringing in some kind of extra income dir them, if you don't like it, you better start walking

 

...there you go lmao

 

And i am paying for it by swiping my metrocard everytime I board the station therefore I expect decent service. Ha.  :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes even if it was a Victoria Secret Microsoft or T-Mobile wrap ad etc etc of course I would be opposed to it. Call me a foamer (and thanks for the compliment) but I dont like the idea of commercialism taking over the system to the point that we have NTTs rolling rolling rollin like mobile billboards.

 

As another fellow member said it takes away from the awesomeness of the subway cars. If I want to look for ads for phat sports cars (like I got the money), or the latest smartphones, or a buy a sexy piece of lingerie for my sexy lovely kittens to wear in the bedroom for me, or get the scoop on the next shit sitcom  I can google it or get it in the newspaper, thats all there is to it. I don't need Windows 8 wrap ads thrown on my face on an R142 or an R160 in this case to be in the know that a new product is out. Oh man, whats next? Wrap ads on the R188's?

 

Yeah what was the opposing arguement again before anyone asks? hey realizm then if you dont like it, then pay for operational costs with an extra 25 cents added to the fare with the next fare hike to pay for keeping the system in good working order blah blah played out arguement please. Ok I sure got an answer,  the answer is tell Albany get off their asses and give the MTA a break already with more funding and tell Pendergrast to stop the financial commitee to mismanage the funds. There.

I didn't know that this was a serious issue to you.

 

Anyhow I'm inclined to agree with your stance on invasive ads, and ads in general on transit vehicles. They're there to simply make  quick buck as the annual earning don't amount to a grand figure and the end scheme of things.

 

As for my comment on the Victoria's Secret ad, that stemmed from a convo where I said that I'd rather look at some women over a car, in reference to the Jaguar ad out now.

 

Its their trains, they can do whatever the hell they wanna do with them, its bringing in some kind of extra income dir them, if you don't like it, you better start walking

 

...there you go lmao

Public transit is meant to serve the public, so public input on various issues should be taken into consideration.

 

And i am paying for it by swiping my metrocard everytime I board the station therefore I expect decent service. Ha.  :D

Right on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.