CenSin 3,408 Posted September 22, 2010 Share #201 Posted September 22, 2010 If the goes 4 Av Local, then the will be delayed!B) Of the two, I'd rather the local be delayed. The other option is to better manage the schedules. One thing I've noticed is that if a leaves the terminal at about the same time as the , the will be held up. This is a correlation from simple observation. The solution would then be to have the depart sooner or the depart later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Line1291 24 Posted September 22, 2010 Share #202 Posted September 22, 2010 Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the ran local north of 36th St w/ the that would allow the to run more Culver Express trains north of Church Av since the 4th Av and Culver lines run around the Park Slope vicinity and cross each other at 4th Av/9th St. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NX Express 292 Posted September 22, 2010 Share #203 Posted September 22, 2010 Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the ran local north of 36th St w/ the that would allow the to run more Culver Express trains north of Church Av since the 4th Av and Culver lines run around the Park Slope vicinity and cross each other at 4th Av/9th St. The is above-ground at 4 Av, the is below ground. One does not affect the other. EDIT: I see what you mean, but would Culver riders want to go a few stops on a and then go downstairs to the and reverse in the evening? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted October 23, 2010 Author Share #204 Posted October 23, 2010 Newer version =P : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted October 23, 2010 Author Share #205 Posted October 23, 2010 Newer version =P : Map 2 by Cinema34, on Flickr"] Map 2 by Cinema34, on Flickr[/url] New changes: The new (P) train brought back via 5th avenue, from 12 Avenue-34 street to 125 street. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin 3,408 Posted October 24, 2010 Share #206 Posted October 24, 2010 Newer version =P : Map 2 by Cinema34, on Flickr"] Map 2 by Cinema34, on Flickr[/url] New changes: The new (P) train brought back via 5th avenue, from 12 Avenue-34 street to 125 street. You could have edited your previous post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted October 24, 2010 Author Share #207 Posted October 24, 2010 You could have edited your previous post. Oh yeah.... I didn't even notice that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share #208 Posted November 7, 2010 Any Ideas on what I should do on my next map? I'm running out, also the triboro RX is not in the cards now sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IRT Bronx Express 373 Posted November 7, 2010 Share #209 Posted November 7, 2010 You can expand the Archer Avenue line much farther, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share #210 Posted November 7, 2010 You can expand the Archer Avenue line much farther, right? Yeah, I'll do it, thanks for the idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T to Dyre Avenue 1,446 Posted November 7, 2010 Share #211 Posted November 7, 2010 You've got no Broadway service on the Queens Blvd line . That's not good. Why not put the back on Queens Blvd so it can still have access to a subway yard? There are people who take the Queens Blvd line do use the . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share #212 Posted November 7, 2010 You've got no Broadway service on the Queens Blvd line . That's not good. Why not put the back on Queens Blvd so it can still have access to a subway yard? There are people who take the Queens Blvd line do use the . Oh crap I forgot about that, thanks. but what about the ? I'll just put via Astoria via a different tunnel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T to Dyre Avenue 1,446 Posted November 7, 2010 Share #213 Posted November 7, 2010 Problem with the is that it runs via 2nd Avenue, so it only serves the East Side of Manhattan. The Broadway Line is much more centralized in Manhattan so it serves many more major destination points directly. It's very convenient, even if the does run local in Queens. By being near the eastern edge of Manhattan for most of its route, the will be less convenient than the . Perhaps the would be better suited to running with the in Astoria than the would. That way, Astoria riders get a choice of Manhattan trunk routes with the and . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share #214 Posted November 7, 2010 Problem with the is that it runs via 2nd Avenue, so it only serves the East Side of Manhattan. The Broadway Line is much more centralized in Manhattan so it serves many more major destination points directly. It's very convenient, even if the does run local in Queens. By being near the eastern edge of Manhattan for most of its route, the will be less convenient than the . Perhaps the would be better suited to running with the in Astoria than the would. That way, Astoria riders get a choice of Manhattan trunk routes with the and . That's true. thanks, I would just extend it to Ditmars BLVD only, the & V could do the job the rest of the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IRT Bronx Express 373 Posted November 7, 2010 Share #215 Posted November 7, 2010 Yeah, I'll do it, thanks for the idea Also, you might want two more trains to properly serve Riverdale since it's a bit isolated. :tup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share #216 Posted November 7, 2010 Also, you might want two more trains to properly serve Riverdale since it's a bit isolated. :tup: I know, maybe I'll extend the to Riverdale-263? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q101 E Midtown 63 Posted November 8, 2010 Share #217 Posted November 8, 2010 Nice. Out of curiosity, how do you use that template? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted November 8, 2010 Author Share #218 Posted November 8, 2010 Nice. Out of curiosity, how do you use that template? What do you mean by template? like how I put it from flickr but I forgot XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q101 E Midtown 63 Posted November 8, 2010 Share #219 Posted November 8, 2010 What do you mean by template? like how I put it from flickr but I forgot XD I mean the map template. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokkemon 448 Posted November 8, 2010 Share #220 Posted November 8, 2010 I know, maybe I'll extend the to Riverdale-263? No. The folks up there don't want it and it would just be a waste. The is fine as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IRT Bronx Express 373 Posted November 8, 2010 Share #221 Posted November 8, 2010 I know, maybe I'll extend the to Riverdale-263?via Broadway, yep. And maybe the as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted November 8, 2010 Author Share #222 Posted November 8, 2010 via Broadway, yep. And maybe the as well. Ok I'll do that since there might be demand for 2 trunk lines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted November 9, 2010 Author Share #223 Posted November 9, 2010 Heres the new one: Changes: - The Archer Avenue line has been extended to 196 Street with the running express, & the local, just like the Lex. Avenue line. - The & trains have been extended to 263 Street via Bway. - The now runs express on Hillside Av. - The goes to Ditmars now (via a different tunnel under the ) Also the replaces the . http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4015/5162031807_00316bc39b_b.jpg' alt='5162031807_00316bc39b_b.jpg'> Ideas map by Cinema34, on Flickr[/img] Leave Comments, concerns & more ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NX Express 292 Posted November 9, 2010 Share #224 Posted November 9, 2010 Good luck convincing Lefferts and JFK riders to take the as a local! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local 0 Posted November 9, 2010 Author Share #225 Posted November 9, 2010 Good luck convincing Lefferts and JFK riders to take the as a local! Ok then should I switch the & in Queens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.