P3F Posted December 8, 2015 Share #26 Posted December 8, 2015 Those are my videos and they were considered rare Well if you call your videos rare and exclusive, why can't the kid do so as well? You haven't trademarked those terms. Also, CenSin raises a valid point above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted December 8, 2015 Share #27 Posted December 8, 2015 The first ride… is no different from the second… is no different from the third. The guy could have taken the second train and the footage would be identical. Yeah that was my fault on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacemak3r Posted December 8, 2015 Share #28 Posted December 8, 2015 The terms "exclusive" and "rare" has been overly used in the transit world many, many times. This statement is beyond true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YankeesPwnMets Posted December 8, 2015 Share #29 Posted December 8, 2015 YOU'RE arguement is void because this doesn't happen often as much, so it's rare. Secondly, I never said anything about the train skipping Bergen St. All I said that the train that I was on, ran underneath Bergen, not going through the side platform. Before you jump up and say anything, watch the WHOLE video first. Ok. In my videos, I don't call everything that I see an exclusive. I only call it if I see for the first time, if it good. Don't judge me because YOU would call any bus you see an exclusive. Like your LIRR video, you said it was rare when you saw a Brooklyn train on the Long Island bound track. IT'S NOT RARE. It's been happening since 2008. You're = You are, fyi. The correct word here would be "your." Sorry, I had to stick that in there. Seriously though, show some respect. Cait has perfectly valid arguments here, while all you are doing is getting mad. Perk up. Just because something is rare to you, doesn't mean it is rare to others. Using your logic, the via West End or via Sea Beach would be rare because I have personally never seen either reroute in person, since I don't ride West End or Sea Beach. The via Express happens a little too frequently to be called "rare." Something "rare" would be like the via Jerome to Woodlawn or the to Coney Island. Rule of thumb: if you see several Youtube videos of a certain GO over the course of several weeks or months, it's probably not "rare." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted December 8, 2015 Share #30 Posted December 8, 2015 Well if you call your videos rare and exclusive, why can't the kid do so as well? You haven't trademarked those terms. Also, CenSin raises a valid point above. I would think that an R160 , an to Coney Island and an via the spur track(I'd love to know who in RTO authorized that move!)are pretty damn rare... The issue is not the term "rare" or "exclusive" but the incorrect use of the word.Daniel's use of those terms is accurate and within the meaning of those words including the first out of Hudson Yards.TransitJusticeForAll is using these terms incorrectly by calling the Culver Express rare when it has happened many times before and this is his first time riding it.That's not an "exclusive" or "rare" thing at all. And to CenSin, the footage would be similar but in no way identical.Your right in saying that Hudson Yards will always be there but I highly doubt that this particular moment will ever happen again and that's why I think his use of exclusive is valid especially because there is no other footage of the first train from that car on YT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttcsubwayfan Posted December 9, 2015 Share #31 Posted December 9, 2015 The terms "exclusive" and "rare" has been overly used in the transit world many, many times. This statement is beyond true. This issue goes far beyond the transit world. It's basically the Youtube transit equivalent of these... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegoBrickBreaker101 Posted December 9, 2015 Share #32 Posted December 9, 2015 This issue goes far beyond the transit world. It's basically the Youtube transit equivalent of these... Mind blown omg lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted December 9, 2015 Share #33 Posted December 9, 2015 I would think that an R160 , an to Coney Island and an via the spur track(I'd love to know who in RTO authorized that move!)are pretty damn rare... The issue is not the term "rare" or "exclusive" but the incorrect use of the word.Daniel's use of those terms is accurate and within the meaning of those words including the first out of Hudson Yards.TransitJusticeForAll is using these terms incorrectly by calling the Culver Express rare when it has happened many times before and this is his first time riding it.That's not an "exclusive" or "rare" thing at all. And to CenSin, the footage would be similar but in no way identical.Your right in saying that Hudson Yards will always be there but I highly doubt that this particular moment will ever happen again and that's why I think his use of exclusive is valid especially because there is no other footage of the first train from that car on YT. Yep exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Union Tpke Posted December 13, 2015 Share #34 Posted December 13, 2015 Great vid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.