Wallyhorse Posted July 9, 2013 Share #876 Posted July 9, 2013 What the hell is your fetish? Send it to Broadway Junction with the , Church Avenue, now Coney Island? Lets not forget that to Metropolitan Avenue but signed as an . Is getting stupid. What's next, send te to Jamaica-179 street via QBL Express? It was really done to drive home the point that it won't be for some time to come before ANY changes are made along the 8th Avenue line, and if there are, it won't be until the new Hudson Yards buildings open in a few years at the earliest, something people missed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadcruiser1 Posted July 9, 2013 Share #877 Posted July 9, 2013 It was really done to drive home the point that it won't be for some time to come before ANY changes are made along the 8th Avenue line, and if there are, it won't be until the new Hudson Yards buildings open in a few years at the earliest, something people missed. Please stop.... 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamen Rider Posted July 9, 2013 Share #878 Posted July 9, 2013 It was really done to drive home the point that it won't be for some time to come before ANY changes are made along the 8th Avenue line, and if there are, it won't be until the new Hudson Yards buildings open in a few years at the earliest, something people missed.. Hudson yards are going to have ZERO effect on 8th ave , get that trough your thick head. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IRT Bronx Express Posted July 9, 2013 Share #879 Posted July 9, 2013 (edited) It looks like Wally needs to create a fantasy subway map one day because it's quite clear that no one likes his ideas... Edited July 9, 2013 by IRT Bronx Express 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTheTransitMan Posted July 9, 2013 Share #880 Posted July 9, 2013 (edited) No, no, no, if he did that there would be a subway line going though every street and every avenue in Manhattan! Edited July 9, 2013 by DanTheTransitMan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vistausss Posted July 9, 2013 Share #881 Posted July 9, 2013 (edited) So if you are gonna have the connect to the IND Queens Boulevard line, might as well restore it's former service to Forest Hills. If you can convince the to switch back to the rigid 1950's service pattern (even if only for Forest Hills) then it would actually be possible to send the back up there again. Edited July 9, 2013 by Vistausss 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
realizm Posted July 9, 2013 Share #882 Posted July 9, 2013 (edited) So if you are gonna have the connect to the IND Queens Boulevard line, might as well restore it's former service to Forest Hills. Impossible. Capacity problems @ Forest Hills. Introduction of the 63rd Street connector and the original along with the reroute forced operation planners to make the controversial decision to cut back service from Forest Hills to Court Square, which are all factors. Now we have the combo BMT Eastern Div Lcl/IND QBL Lcl via 6th Ave called the . Of course we have the . How can we have all three local services terminate at Forest Hills? The , the and the ? It is not realistically possible even if the MTA wanted to. You do the math on the TPH max that Forest Hills can handle, since I did it yesterday already.. Edited July 9, 2013 by realizm 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
realizm Posted July 9, 2013 Share #883 Posted July 9, 2013 (edited) No, no, no, if he did that there would be a subway line going though every street and every avenue in Manhattan! ...... with a extension from who the hell knows where to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for dual subway service with SEPTA. Edited July 9, 2013 by realizm 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallyhorse Posted July 9, 2013 Share #884 Posted July 9, 2013 ...... with a extension from who the hell knows where to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for dual subway service with SEPTA. LOL!!!! The chances of the getting to Secaucus are only slightly better. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vistausss Posted July 9, 2013 Share #885 Posted July 9, 2013 ...... with a extension from who the hell knows where to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for dual subway service with SEPTA. LMAO. It'll probably start at SI and through the yet-to-be-finished subway tunnel (the one with the bellmouth at Owl Heads Park) and then via South Ferry using a new level with a new express track via an el to the closest possible point where it can switch onto the current track. Then via TSQ to NJ using a new express track in the PATH tunnel via Newark. The Trenton line from NJT would be converted for subway usage and the will utilise that track to reach Philadelphia where it utilises the closest SEPTA line to downtown PA. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobtehpanda Posted July 9, 2013 Share #886 Posted July 9, 2013 If you can convince the to switch back to the rigid 1950's service pattern (even if only for Forest Hills) then it would actually be possible to send the back up there again. I wonder how bad the delays on QBL would've been back in the days of deferred maintenance. Seriously you are gonna piss off a lot of subway riders like this. truncated to Broadway Junction and to Canarsie? That's gotta be one of the silliest ideas I have ever heard . And I live by Fresh Pond Road and I do not want the to replace the . is fine the way it is and the reroute to Forest Hills to replace the also helped me get to Times Square without having to transfer to the or . And a resurrection and an 8 train is crap. The IRT 7th avenue line is fine the way it is and the Lexington Avenue Line also is fine the way it is. Also you're eliminating the Brighton Line Express. I'm not gonna lie but I thought it wouldn't be needed earlier when I posted a reroute but I realized the Brighton Express is needed and my idea was crap. Also you can't have the terminate at Queens Plaza. It would disrupt service at the station since it would layover and have to switch tracks. It's better if you just restored it to Forest Hills-71 Avenue like it used to. And train on 2nd Avenue and Broadway line? Even a proposal of QJT to merge B13 and Q67 (which made no sense of course) is more believable than that . And also to Jamaica-179 Street and to Inwood and to WTC? I bet you'll get sued. Wait a minute train to Coney Island? This is one of the worst ideas I have ever heard. I suggest you study the NYC Subway system or else you are gonna get bashed a lot. And those are like half of the flaws I pointed out. If you call this "constructive", then you have issues. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vistausss Posted July 9, 2013 Share #887 Posted July 9, 2013 It's not constructive per se, but it's at least a bit better than some of qjtransitmaster's posts And yeah, those delays back in the days must've been pretty bad... or not. The speed was also higher with stop-at-sight still in place. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q90 Posted July 9, 2013 Share #888 Posted July 9, 2013 I wonder how bad the delays on QBL would've been back in the days of deferred maintenance. If you call this "constructive", then you have issues. Again I was harsh but I never made any direct insults to the OP. Saying an idea is crap/silly isn't bashing. It shows that the idea made no sense whatsoever. Criticism like that helped me so there was nothing wrong with what I said. Sometimes you have to be a bit harsh instead of cutting slack to help the OP learn that this idea would not do well for NYC. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q90 Posted July 10, 2013 Share #889 Posted July 10, 2013 ...... with a extension from who the hell knows where to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for dual subway service with SEPTA. LOL and I thought QJT's proposed bus routes were insane! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q90 Posted July 10, 2013 Share #890 Posted July 10, 2013 I don't think you'll see any changes for now. I suspect you will see some changes as the new buildings on the Hudson Yards go up and are actually operational in a few years. That would be when I would be looking to do a move of the to the Culver line after West 4th, running with the with the (as a Culver Local) shortened to Church Avenue and the (as a Culver express) replacing it to Coney Island (except overnights, when the would run as it does now) while the replaces the as a local in Brooklyn to Euclid (though some 's would run to Chambers as they do now to avoid capacity issues in rush hours and overnights would be extended to Lefferts to replace the overnight shuttle) with a 2-5 TPH supplemental line replicating the old (AA) between Chambers and 168th for those in lower Manhattan looking for the upper west side local stations (weekends, the would be a 2-6 TPH line since the does not run then). By the times those buildings in the Hudson Yards go up, I suspect you will see a demand for 8th Avenue service from the Culver line as some companies are already as I understand it committed to moving there when those buildings open, with an increased demand overall for 8th Avenue service. By then, hopefully there will be enough subway cars available to handle such. I don't think you'll see any changes for now. I suspect you will see some changes as the new buildings on the Hudson Yards go up and are actually operational in a few years. That would be when I would be looking to do a move of the to the Culver line after West 4th, running with the with the (as a Culver Local) shortened to Church Avenue and the (as a Culver express) replacing it to Coney Island (except overnights, when the would run as it does now) while the replaces the as a local in Brooklyn to Euclid (though some 's would run to Chambers as they do now to avoid capacity issues in rush hours and overnights would be extended to Lefferts to replace the overnight shuttle) with a 2-5 TPH supplemental line replicating the old (AA) between Chambers and 168th for those in lower Manhattan looking for the upper west side local stations (weekends, the would be a 2-6 TPH line since the does not run then). By the times those buildings in the Hudson Yards go up, I suspect you will see a demand for 8th Avenue service from the Culver line as some companies are already as I understand it committed to moving there when those buildings open, with an increased demand overall for 8th Avenue service. By then, hopefully there will be enough subway cars available to handle such. What the hell did I just read because none of that made sense. And seriously C train to Coney Island and F truncated to Church Avenue? The C train's purpose is to essentially be a local A. Sending C s to Coney Island would destroy that purpose. And F train truncation to Church Avenue? I think it's more likely the MTA builds a subway from New York to Los Angeles than that happening. (Couldn't use emoticons because of the stupid limits) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
favbusbx13 Posted July 10, 2013 Share #891 Posted July 10, 2013 Lol 4 lines down 7thAv, good ol days, C to Coney? Lmao 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
favbusbx13 Posted July 10, 2013 Share #892 Posted July 10, 2013 Lol 4 lines down 7thAv, good ol days, C to Coney? Lmao 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
favbusbx13 Posted July 10, 2013 Share #893 Posted July 10, 2013 Lol 4 lines down 7thAv, good ol days, C to Coney? Lmao 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
realizm Posted July 10, 2013 Share #894 Posted July 10, 2013 Lol 4 lines down 7thAv, good ol days, C to Coney? Lmao to CI? Yeah I know, that's really bugged out. Lol 4 lines down 7thAv, good ol days, C to Coney? Lmao to CI? Yeah I know, that's really bugged out. Lol 4 lines down 7thAv, good ol days, C to Coney? Lmao See above comments. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowblock Posted July 10, 2013 Share #895 Posted July 10, 2013 He talks about his precious Hudson Yards like it's gonna be the ONLY busy part of the city once it opens..... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
realizm Posted July 10, 2013 Share #896 Posted July 10, 2013 He talks about his precious Hudson Yards like it's gonna be the ONLY busy part of the city once it opens..... I'm surprised he did'nt talk about the from the Hillside Ave Line to Hempstead via a LIRR miracle on FRA requirements or something. All good, dude's got a vivid imagination. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamen Rider Posted July 11, 2013 Share #897 Posted July 11, 2013 Many of us have very vivid imaginations, we just keep the crazy stuff to ourselves... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
realizm Posted July 11, 2013 Share #898 Posted July 11, 2013 lol 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadcruiser1 Posted July 11, 2013 Share #899 Posted July 11, 2013 Horse just needs some of these. Afterwards he will be good.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vistausss Posted July 11, 2013 Share #900 Posted July 11, 2013 Horse just needs some of these. Afterwards he will be good.... I don't think that will solve the problem. Ritalin is more to get one to calm their tits, not so much to calm their imagination. Vicodin on the other hand would come in handy for him... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.