Jump to content

Department of Subways - Proposals/Ideas


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, T to Dyre Avenue said:

Why? It’s not that busy on the weekends.

Right.  If anything, I would have the (M) if not going fully up 6th Avenue terminate at West 4th and have the (D) go local on 6th Avenue (with the (M) using the express tracks to turn north of West 4th), though ideally, I would have the (M) go to 96th/2nd weekends if only to keep 6th Avenue service in order then.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 12.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Chambers St is a better terminal than W 4 Street. Nothing's impacted with the (M) on Nassau St and it affords the line more transfers to Broadway and Lexington Ave. A W 4 Street terminus forces a double merge for the (D), thus slowing down the service. Also, the only thing gained by such an extension is a new transfer to the (6) and (D). Hardly worth it in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lance said:

Chambers St is a better terminal than W 4 Street. Nothing's impacted with the (M) on Nassau St and it affords the line more transfers to Broadway and Lexington Ave. A W 4 Street terminus forces a double merge for the (D), thus slowing down the service. Also, the only thing gained by such an extension is a new transfer to the (6) and (D). Hardly worth it in my opinion.

True, however, we are talking nights and weekends when there are fewer trains overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to share another proposal- this one is a bit foamish, however. Thoughts?

The Liberty Av EL is demolished and replaced with a parallel subway running via Pitkin Av/Linden Blvd. Underserved transit deserts in Eastern Queens will now have subway access to Manhattan. 

(A): Normal route, 207 St to Far Rockaway.

(C): 168 St, extended to 234 St-Cambria Heights near the Nassau County line via Linden Blvd, Fulton St express days, peak express between Cross Bay Blvd and Francis Lewis Blvd.

(T): Replaces (C) as Fulton Local, to Francis Lewis Blvd rush hrs, other times to Cross Bay Blvd. 

(M): Extended to Howard Beach-JFK via the RBB, with three rush hour trains running from Rockaway Park to 2 Av-Houston. Other times, this is replaced by split (A) service between the two Rockaway terminus. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Coney Island Av said:

I'm going to share another proposal- this one is a bit foamish, however. Thoughts?

The Liberty Av EL is demolished and replaced with a parallel subway running via Pitkin Av/Linden Blvd. Underserved transit deserts in Eastern Queens will now have subway access to Manhattan. 

(A): Normal route, 207 St to Far Rockaway.

(C): 168 St, extended to 234 St-Cambria Heights near the Nassau County line via Linden Blvd, Fulton St express days, peak express between Cross Bay Blvd and Francis Lewis Blvd.

(T): Replaces (C) as Fulton Local, to Francis Lewis Blvd rush hrs, other times to Cross Bay Blvd. 

(M): Extended to Howard Beach-JFK via the RBB, with three rush hour trains running from Rockaway Park to 2 Av-Houston. Other times, this is replaced by split (A) service between the two Rockaway terminus. 

 

Why demolish the Liberty El? Liberty Avenue has grown around the subway become a bustling commercial strip. Elevateds seem bad, but remember Jamaica Avenue: businesses thought the demolition of the el would be the best thing since sliced bread; the eventual demolition sucked potential customers away from Jamaica Avenue and bankrupted their business. I agree, though, with following through on the IND Second System plan to extend the Fulton Line, but I'd do it like this:

(A) Fulton Express to Far Rockaway. (don't split the A; you'll leave Far Rockaway underserved and Rockaway Park overserved)

(C) Fulton Express to Lefferts Blvd.

(S) to Rockaway Park stays as it is.

(T) Fulton Local to Cambria Heights. (via a two-track line under Pitkin and Linden. three-tracks is probably overkill, and I don't think there will be enough stops on the existing Fulton line and the Cambria line to make getting to Manhattan too slow; the Fulton express will have 2x the capacity for Cambria Hts riders who need express service.)

I disagree on the RBB, at least in the short term. If we're going to do expansions off the Fulton Line it should be 1. connecting the SAS, 2. going to Eastern Queens, then maybe 3. the RBB. Plus, a local (M) from Rockaway to Manhattan is certainly not going to be more attractive than the current setup. Don't you think most Rockaway riders will bail at Rockaway Blvd to get express (A)(C) service to Manhattan, rather than going via Queens Blvd?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LGA Link N train said:

yeah, and on nights and weekends you're better off sending (M) trains to Chambers Street

Except West 4th provides more transfers, including to the (A)(C)(E) at West 4th and the (D)(6) at Broadway-Lafayette.  That's why I go to West 4 and make the (D) a local between West 4th and 34th (which on weekends has the added benefit of giving riders at 14th and 23rd twice as much service) on nights and weekends.    

Edited by Wallyhorse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Wallyhorse said:

Except West 4th provides more transfers, including to the (A)(C)(E) at West 4th and the (D)(6) at Broadway-Lafayette.  That's why I go to West 4 and make the (D) a local between West 4th and 34th (which on weekends has the added benefit of giving riders at 14th and 23rd twice as much service) on nights and weekends.    

Sending the (M) to Chambers get people to the (6) at Canal and the (F) at Essex for 6th Avenue service. While there's no direct 8th Avenue transfer, there are several ways to get there and it's not worth complicating (D)(F)(M) service just to allow for a small number of people going from the (M) to the 8th Avenue trains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Wallyhorse said:

Except West 4th provides more transfers, including to the (A)(C)(E) at West 4th and the (D)(6) at Broadway-Lafayette.  That's why I go to West 4 and make the (D) a local between West 4th and 34th (which on weekends has the added benefit of giving riders at 14th and 23rd twice as much service) on nights and weekends.    

If those transfers were really important, the most logical option would be to extend it to Broad Street, which grants the (M) (compared to today’s service) access to 10 routes in Manhattan on a normal weekend instead of just 1. Comparisons of proposals:

  • Delancey Street–Essex Street (1 line, 1 route)
    (F)
  • West 4 Street–Washington Square (3 lines, 6 routes)
    (6)(A)(C)(E)(D)(F)
  • Chambers Street (3 lines, 7 routes)
    (4)(5)(6)(F)(N)(Q)(R)
  • Broad Street (5 lines, 10 routes)
    (2)(3)(4)(5)(A)(C)(F)(N)(Q)(R)

The long-term solution might just be to connect Bowery to Grand Street should the MTA not be inclined to extend the (M) that far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or you know, perhaps it should be recognized that not everyone can be given one- or two-seat rides to their destinations. At least not without inconveniencing others.

In about a year, the (M) will be a 24/7 Manhattan-Brooklyn route with service to midtown at all times. During the year or so that follows, there will be plenty of time to see if a permanent extension would be beneficial to riders and not wasteful spending due to extraneous services. Until then, Essex St and/or Chambers St are the best possible terminals for the present weekend (M).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, officiallyliam said:

Sending the (M) to Chambers get people to the (6) at Canal and the (F) at Essex for 6th Avenue service. While there's no direct 8th Avenue transfer, there are several ways to get there and it's not worth complicating (D)(F)(M) service just to allow for a small number of people going from the (M) to the 8th Avenue trains.

I suspect that's a bigger number than you realize.  I'm sure quite a few are looking for the (C) in particular at West 4 to get to CPW for example (especially if they are going to the Museum of Natural History for example).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wallyhorse said:

I suspect that's a bigger number than you realize.  I'm sure quite a few are looking for the (C) in particular at West 4 to get to CPW for example (especially if they are going to the Museum of Natural History for example).  

I live near the (M) in Ridgewood. I take it sometimes on the weekends. The Ridgewood or Williamsburg to Central Park West corridor (which isn't really a thing in the first place) does not warrant extending the (M) to West 4 and screwing up (D)(F) service. It's a much smaller number than you realize.

The (M) to Essex Street, for now, does just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wallyhorse said:

I suspect that's a bigger number than you realize.  I'm sure quite a few are looking for the (C) in particular at West 4 to get to CPW for example (especially if they are going to the Museum of Natural History for example).  

Hospitals, schools, Wall Street, casinos, race tracks, and now museums? I understand that those things are all important to you, but it’s highly suspect when you say that there are enough regular folks doing all of that to warrant bending service for that crowd.

And why not send (M) trains to Broad Street, where it will obviously do less harm while providing more options?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I think we should replace the weekend (M) entirely with a service that runs from Bay Ridge-95 St, terminates at Chambers St days, and late nights/weekends to Metropolitan Av. We can call this service the (Z) aka the "Brown (R) Bankers Special!" (Wally.exe has stopped working)

In all seriousness, the best option is to extend the weekend (M) to Broad St. It'll provide more options, just as @CenSin stated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CenSin said:

And why not send (M) trains to Broad Street, where it will obviously do less harm while providing more options?

 

18 minutes ago, Coney Island Av said:

In all seriousness, the best option is to extend the weekend (M) to Broad St. It'll provide more options, just as @CenSin stated. 

The (M) to Broad Street gets into Manhattan and then turns south - a direction hardly anyone is going on weekends. The majority of riders coming from Brooklyn will switch to uptown (F) trains at Essex - hence why weekend (J) service didn’t even go as far as Broad until a few years ago.

The best weekend service patterns for the (M) go uptown on Sixth Avenue - where people want to go. Ideally, weekend (M) service should go to 57th or Queens Plaza, but if that would disrupt service too much, 96th is another option.

Edited by officiallyliam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, officiallyliam said:

 

The (M) to Broad Street gets into Manhattan and then turns south - a direction hardly anyone is going on weekends. The majority of riders coming from Brooklyn will switch to uptown (F) trains at Essex - hence why weekend (J) service didn’t even go as far as Broad until a few years ago.

The best weekend service patterns for the (M) go uptown on Sixth Avenue - where people want to go. Ideally, weekend (M) service should go to 57th or Queens Plaza, but if that would disrupt service too much, 96th is another option.

Which is why it's going to 96th when the (L) shutdown happens. 

This was about extending the current weekend (M) to West 4th outside of that so people can have easier transfers at Broadway-Lafayette to the (D) & (6) and at West 4th to the (A)(C)(E) and a cross-platform platform to the (F).  You can have the (D) and (M) cross each other on weekends because fewer trains are running overall and it also provides additional local service to 14th and 23rd on weekends.

That all said, I suspect once the (M) does go to 96/2 late nights and weekends, that will be made permanent even after the (L) shutdown.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having the (D) cross to the local track just for two stops and then back onto the express track is literally a waste of time. This isn't like evening and weekend (E) service, where the line has to switch for two extra stops to allow trains to be stored on the express track (when the headways on all Queens Boulevard lines go down after the PM Rush Hour) east of Forest Hills due to lack of space at Jamaica Yard. In the (D) 's case, it is vastly different and should not be treated as such. Either run the (M) to Forest Hills or 96 St or don't.

The (M) to Chambers provides a transfer to the Lexington Avenue Line and the Broadway Line besides 6th Avenue. But it's not like there are so many people traveling on weekends compared to weekdays, are they or are they not?

EDIT: Anywho, a simple direct Midtown Manhattan extension or a Chambers Street-bound extension should be enough.

Edited by Jemorie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Wallyhorse said:

Which is why it's going to 96th when the (L) shutdown happens. 

This was about extending the current weekend (M) to West 4th outside of that so people can have easier transfers at Broadway-Lafayette to the (D) & (6) and at West 4th to the (A)(C)(E) and a cross-platform platform to the (F).  You can have the (D) and (M) cross each other on weekends because fewer trains are running overall and it also provides additional local service to 14th and 23rd on weekends.

That all said, I suspect once the (M) does go to 96/2 late nights and weekends, that will be made permanent even after the (L) shutdown.  

You still haven’t explain why this is better than sending it to Broad Street. I thought you loved the Financial District?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jemorie said:

Wallyhorse, they’re not going to do all that extra shit just so the weekend (M) can provide more transferring opportunities. Subway ridership is lower on weekends than on weekdays and will always be.

That statement is absolutely incorrect. For the past 7 years since 2011, subway ridership has been higher on weekends than on weekdays. Here is a link to provide you with statistical evidence to prove my point: http://web.mta.info/nyct/facts/ridership/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AlgorithmOfTruth said:

That statement is absolutely incorrect. For the past 7 years since 2011, subway ridership has been higher on weekends than on weekdays. Here is a link to provide you with statistical evidence to prove my point: http://web.mta.info/nyct/facts/ridership/

What have you been smoking? PM me I want some.

Unless I've somehow ended up back in 1890, the weekend contains two days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AlgorithmOfTruth said:

That statement is absolutely incorrect. For the past 7 years since 2011, subway ridership has been higher on weekends than on weekdays. Here is a link to provide you with statistical evidence to prove my point: http://web.mta.info/nyct/facts/ridership/

Combined on weekends, sure, but ridership on either day (Saturday or Sunday) is lower than an average weekday.

That said, maybe it's time to consider having some form of rush hour-level service on Saturdays when ridership is considerably higher than Sunday.  Maybe some form of a PM rush hour as between people returning from daytime activities and those going out for Saturday night that runs from say 3:00-7:30 PM, that would be warranted, 

This might also warrant for instance having the (M) go to 71-Continental on Saturdays, especially during the (L) shutdown next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A weekday ridership average considers any one of 5 days: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. A weekend day ridership average considers any one of 2 days: Saturday and Sunday. HOWEVER, this is not a comparison of a random average weekday's ridership to a random average weekend day's ridership (which would only be 1 day—Saturday or Sunday), in which case an individual weekday would reflect a higher average than an individual weekend day. I'm collectively referring to the weekend as 2 days as reflected in the MTA's statistical report under "Average Weekend," not Saturday's and Sunday's individually. Hope that clears up any confusion.

Edited by AlgorithmOfTruth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.