NoHacksJustKhaks

I have given thumbs down before, though I'd much rather explain what I feel is wrong with something instead of mass dislike everything relating to it on a thread. A little funny to watch this happen since these thumbs down does nothing to your reputation but I digress. You can personally block people IIRC, or the moderator can lift his/her "hammer" down on them as well, though @Copper456 isn't much of a threat in this state so I'd just move on.

I wouldn't use the word "popular" to describe it, any train line (not just the ) that experiences car change in this city is bound to get attention for some time by railfans. Now, the has had numerous changes in cars over it's history. Though as with other lines, people (and the fans) typically get used to it after sometime of seeing it. Besides when the changes happen (which i'll agree with you on) I've barely ever seen any fans during all other times.

These "finishing touches" are most likely things that should've been completed before the official opening of the stations. Guess that it's a top priority to get the stations done on time, though as I've said with a lot of the ESI'd CPW stations, it does mean the work is still pretty sloppy in many areas.

If only the couldn't set expectations so low for car cleanliness across the entire fleet in the first place...

Pretty hypo-critical to state regular people like @R32 3838 and @Dj Hammers deserve to get the boot for anything wrong they say, since they speculated as humans normally do. And then you proceed to paint over the original point you tried to make by telling everyone else you're superior since you managed to speculate and guess it right whenever you could (also, with pure speculation and little evidence). I don't understand why you're trying to downplay everyone else's freedoms like this. It's just the internet and whether or not you delve into speculating things further. Time will tell in the end what happens so complaining over something like this is somewhat silly... TLDR: There usually isn't a reward for guessing right in the end, but if you find interest in it, take everything with a grain of salt , especially on these forums.

No need to shout about it, calm down...

Would've been nice if they could've done this on the , a line that hasn't had NTT trains in regularly scheduled service for over +10 years. I'm sure they might soon however, seeing as the already is undergoing testing with them. @Coney Island Av Amazing shots, especially the last one!

Will this be getting a more formal "home" like a Facebook group or website?

I think there is one just south of the station...EDIT: There is

I think it's easier for everyone at this point to see the cracks in the wall this plan presents. It'll be costly, delayed, little planned and frankly seems more of a vanity project with how few it may benefit. I initially supported this plan but no longer do so, and with the delay continuing on, it seems to a rough road to get the portion back into service. I actually contacted an advocate for this plan in the Rockaway's (Stacy Pheffer Amato) and have currently received no email back. We'll have to wait and see...

I see, I do recall the Orion VII's sent on both routes once having the Far Rockaway badges on them, though I do suppose it makes more sense in it's current state.

I've been noticing a lot of Q22's and some Q21's out of JFK depot (at least according to their badge), Aren't both routes usually assigned to Far Rockaway Depot IIRC?

Got it, didn't think of location in my original thoughts. I'm also presuming the station will have to be renovated as well for this to occur; since skylights will look odd under the existing structure for me personally and cost more money to build, since I originally thought otherwise for some reason.

Delays Posted: 10/30/2018 8:26PM and Rockaway Park shuttle train service has resumed with delays following an earlier mechanical problem with the South Channel Bridge.

It would, though it may take away the decaying aspect some people like about it in it's current form. Also, what about graffiti artists and vandals? They'll find a way to ruin it even if good security is implemented. Isn't that one of the reasons Jamaica Van Wyck had it's ones closed for good?

I guess, but I don't see a difference between these leaning benches and regular subway benches in terms of comfort. "feasibly" I don't think anybody really could be sleeping on a regular subway bench for "hours" at a time. If anything, it (standing benches) could push more of these people on trains if done system-wide. The boxy wooden design, and big barriers between each seat on regular benches already does a good job at preventing homeless from sleeping on it. The standing benches may remove this place you're describing by just a bit, but when considering the cost of regular seating for everybody else, I don't know about that...

They seem like a novelty item to me, just there to look "cool" and "modern" in my view. I've never seen it used any time i''ve visited an ESI station either. Also, it isn't exactly meant to repel any homeless populations, as the NY1 article mentioned, though I struggle to see other uses and reasons for it.

I've never seen that sign either, they're probably trying it out or something. Pretty cool in my opinion, though what would be cooler is if they programmed arrows or text on the screen to point on the train that you shouldn't board. For improved communication to those who have never been on the subway before (especially along Archer where this photo was taken). Maybe in place or right next to the "1." and "2." on the screen

Not a sixth avenue rider whatsoever, but i'd imagine this method would see more short term costs, that the people and the MTA would have to deal with. In this current state, they probably don't want to waste more resources on such a plan that already works ok when stretched out longer, and is more convenient for riders. Even if I do feel your idea is pretty sensible.

I saw an R42 signed up as an H (but likely not in service) in the Rockaways earlier today. The train was approaching B105 st station bound for 116 when I saw it. And I also saw it go in the opposite direction some time later. Any reason for this? Is it a possibility the R42’s will go to the A seeing the J line will be all NTT? Anyways, I wish I got a photo, but I actually saw this out of my schools window lol.

It's little surprise at this point considering Nassau County itself is incredibly car focused, most treat the bus like plague over there and care less if it's passengers get less. Sad since I do remember the bus service being quite a lot better over there than it is now, and Hempstead TS may have been better as well (though I never went there until lately).

He certainly has potential to make major contributions to the subway system if done right (Ex. Fast Forward). And the dedication he has for the system isn't to be scoffed at either. So im certainly hoping for the best from him, though after seeing him handle the SIM buses on Staten Island, I do have some respectful skepticism for him too, even if he is by definition an exemplary transit president. Going back to the subway and a prior point I made, I don't expect the system to suddenly turn into one like MTR's overnight (doesn't even need to). But what I want to see is the system showing signs of being able to keep up. From the factors of increasing ridership and crowds, rising fares, cleanliness and service. From what I've seen this year, im not exactly sure our system can keep up and maintain itself with the times if it keeps improving at this current rate. It's a lot to ask for and it wont come without troubles, but it by no means is impossible either.

Yup, sadly I don't see this project staying within or meeting budget under Cuomo's godforsaken reign; I feel that other factors like potential economic struggles (say for instance) will play a larger role than politics since it seems to have been rather unaffecting during phase 1 IIRC, compared to other projects like Fulton St.. About the 6 billion dollar point you brought up however, it is extreme, but expected since you have to realize this city is one of the most expensive to build in, costs will always be higher than perceived since New York isn't cheap. A far bigger concern for me is the amount of benefits we'll receive by the time the it opens (a long time away). With the growth of our system already steadily rising, it might barely make a difference in the issue of crowds and what not by then.

Changes have been slow in my opinion from the slightly hyperbolic "State Of Emergency" Cuomo declared last year. While the agency is picking itself up for once (i've seen less trash, delays seem to be down, communication is better), crowding still is an issue, trains are still greatly unreliable for many and fares keep going up for little justified service. It's a good start in my book, though more improvements in the system will be needed for it to handle future generations.

Signal Switch issues might've been the reason...