Jump to content
Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.
Sign in to follow this  
BklynSouth

The New "Taking Of Pelham 123"

Recommended Posts

If you have seen this film, I would like to know what you thought, not much of the acting by the actors, but of the trains and the relationship to the story. Was it true to the story line? The right trains ,for the right locations?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know im going 180 degress here...but in the movie " american gangster ", which takes place in the late 60s early 70s, they have R62s smh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if u based ur opnion on the factual part of the movie it fails there isnt an irt train that goes on the manhattan bridge let alone to coney island and the locations were off if you are a train buff the movie is not technical enough and factual enough

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if u based ur opnion on the factual part of the movie it fails there isnt an irt train that goes on the manhattan bridge let alone to coney island and the locations were off if you are a train buff the movie is not technical enough and factual enough

The thing is, not everyone who goes to see the film is a railbuff or is from New York. A native New Yorker who takes the subway everyday would know damn well that the "number trains" don't run on the Manny B.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will not give an opinion 'cos I haven't seen the remake, but the original is GREAT.

 

Mainly because it's from the 70s, although I kinda wish they used a tagged-up train. I doubt the remake retains the original's sense of humor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The original was an excellent film that was accurate to the pelham line, the new one is putrid with accuracy even before they show the flushing line as the coney island line. They have "track 62", the hidden waldorf-astoria platform as part of the subway systemc somewhere near 33rd street, dead wrong it is at GCT.

 

The film itself was mediocre, Travolta used the phrase "motherf***er" as if it was a punctuation on every sentence. Gandolfini as an obese Gulliani/Bloomberg hybrid (looks like he ate both of them) was amusing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The film itself was mediocre, Travolta used the phrase "motherf***er" as if it was a punctuation on every sentence. Gandolfini as an obese Gulliani/Bloomberg hybrid (looks like he ate both of them) was amusing.

 

I agree. We were showing it from on our Prov-NY runs and most of the passengers were not impressed. After I watched it I realized why, If you've seen the original than this one really sucks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The original was an excellent film that was accurate to the pelham line, the new one is putrid with accuracy even before they show the flushing line as the coney island line. They have "track 62", the hidden waldorf-astoria platform as part of the subway systemc somewhere near 33rd street, dead wrong it is at GCT.

 

The film itself was mediocre, Travolta used the phrase "motherf***er" as if it was a punctuation on every sentence. Gandolfini as an obese Gulliani/Bloomberg hybrid (looks like he ate both of them) was amusing.

LMAO.I have yet to see the remake but the original I`ve see many times and loved it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wirelessly posted via (Mozilla/5.0 (Danger hiptop 4.6; U; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920)

 

Lol the Remake was a flawed errors galore ,the original was true to earth and was way better than its successors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first one had errors too.

I didn't know this thing went backwords!

Seriously? You're a C/R studying to be a motorman and you don't know trains go "forwards" and "backwards" all the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen the 2009 version about 3-4 times and the 1974 version only once. Either way, the 1974 version is WAY better than the 2009 and that crappy 90s version hands-down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol I saw the remake (or the last parts of it last night) and I simply sighed, shook my head and said, "Hollywood, Hollywood..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C'mon, its a movie for god's sake. They can only do so much. At least they actually filmed it in New York.

That being said, I had really been looking forward to it when it came out, and I was disappointed. Still, I did really like the dialogue between Travolta and the dispatcher dude (was it Denzel, I can't remember anymore lol); it was very intense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
C'mon, its a movie for god's sake. They can only do so much. At least they actually filmed it in New York.

That being said, I had really been looking forward to it when it came out, and I was disappointed. Still, I did really like the dialogue between Travolta and the dispatcher dude (was it Denzel, I can't remember anymore lol); it was very intense.

Yes, Denzel Washington.

 

Regular folks (outside the city) won't really care about the inaccuracies that much. It's not just made for us, it's for them as well. They got what they got.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Hollywood, they want to make the movie look good by using all kinds of scenery, hence the part where the (6) train's flying past Shea Stadium (LOL) but if that what rakes in the money for them, be my damn guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's Hollywood, they want to make the movie look good by using all kinds of scenery, hence the part where the (6) train's flying past Shea Stadium (LOL) but if that what rakes in the money for them, be my damn guest

TBH, the people who live outside of New York don't really care if the (6) runs R160s, or flies towards Flushing, that Shea Stadium is by the Pelham Line or that Grand Central is actually a station in Brooklyn. They paid money for action, not um... accuracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in terms of action it was alright...

 

...in terms of accuracy, well, at least they filmed it on the NYC subway at least and not toronto or a set

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
in terms of action it was alright...

 

...in terms of accuracy, well, at least they filmed it on the NYC subway at least and not toronto or a set

Amen

Lower Bay being redone as Canal Street, that was bull

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i still can't get that part when the guy nailed down the lever, got off the train and then pushed a button on the outside to start the train ...WTF ???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

i still can't get that part when the guy nailed down the lever, got off the train and then pushed a button on the outside to start the train ...WTF ???
I've been wondering about that part too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.