Charleston Posted October 22, 2008 #1 Posted October 22, 2008 Right after the Culver Viaduct project is completed in 2012, this is how the plans for F and V trains in Brooklyn would be. All F trains would operate express between Jay St and Church Av stopping at 7th Av and all stops between Coney Island and Church Av during weekdays, late night and weekends, F trains would make all stops between Jay St and Coney Island. V trains would make all stops between Jay St and Church Av weekdays only. Any comments or if you have heard something like this, please post up your comments, I would very much like to hear on what you have to say on this.
MTR Admiralty Posted October 22, 2008 #2 Posted October 22, 2008 Right after the Culver Viaduct project is completed in 2012, this is how the plans for F and V trains in Brooklyn would be. All F trains would operate express between Jay St and Church Av stopping at 7th Av and all stops between Coney Island and Church Av during weekdays, late night and weekends, F trains would make all stops between Jay St and Coney Island. V trains would make all stops between Jay St and Church Av weekdays only. Any comments or if you have heard something like this, please post up your comments, I would very much like to hear on what you have to say on this. Ummm... not trying to criticise you, but is this a question? where you got this from?
N-Trizzy2609 Posted October 22, 2008 #3 Posted October 22, 2008 You forgot Bergen, Lower Bergen is set to reopen after the rehab in order for better service. They added new signage recently and they are repairing the signals.
Y2Julio Posted October 22, 2008 #4 Posted October 22, 2008 That makes no sense. Also, they blocked off the tracks leading from the Bergen Street lower level.
Y2Julio Posted October 22, 2008 #6 Posted October 22, 2008 Great, so now I'm going to be late to work and extra time added to my trip home. The G line sucks.
mark1447 Posted October 22, 2008 #7 Posted October 22, 2008 Zachary Is the a Fact, and switches? I think this is all a a lye rather the goes to chuch.. man u guess love jks lol
Brighton Local Posted October 22, 2008 #8 Posted October 22, 2008 Is the a Fact, and switches? I think this is all a a lye rather the goes to chuch.. man u guess love jks lol No. My plan is definitely not a fact;). Pardon me for not stating that. Sorry everybody! This is just my plan post Culver Viaduct Reconstruction Project. Here I was displaying how the & would utilize Kings Highway as their Terminal/Thru Station. However I don't know for a fact if Charleston's 1st Post is true or not.
B41 Posted October 22, 2008 #9 Posted October 22, 2008 I like it because it reduces waiting time on the .
LTA1992 Posted October 22, 2008 #10 Posted October 22, 2008 That makes no sense. Also, they blocked off the tracks leading from the Bergen Street lower level. CORRECTION. The tracks to Bergen Street LL are not blocked. When there is a service change where the Has to go express to/from Jay Street, The uses the LL but dosent stop.
R32 3348 Posted October 22, 2008 #11 Posted October 22, 2008 Great, so now I'm going to be late to work and extra time added to my trip home. The G line sucks. Chances are the would be extended as well as a local.
MTR Admiralty Posted October 22, 2008 #12 Posted October 22, 2008 CORRECTION. The tracks to Bergen Street LL are not blocked. When there is a service change where the Has to go express to/from Jay Street, The uses the LL but dosent stop. nope, there was a G.O recently where the F ran express from jay to church... it went on the local track (did not access lower level)
MTR Admiralty Posted October 22, 2008 #13 Posted October 22, 2008 Chances are the would be extended as well as a local. The should be extended, so the Park Slopers could get local service to Manhattan. The Park Slopers should stop whining. The line is not the best line in the system, but hey, it's better than having none! Some places in the city have no subway access at all.
Joe Posted October 22, 2008 #14 Posted October 22, 2008 The should be extended, so the Park Slopers could get local service to Manhattan.The Park Slopers should stop whining. The line is not the best line in the system, but hey, it's better than having none! Some places in the city have no subway access at all. Nothing will quiet liberal whine. They could have a one stop ride to Midtown, the cleanest cars, the nicest stations, and the best HVAC; yet they would still find something to whine about.
Zman Posted October 22, 2008 #15 Posted October 22, 2008 Right after the Culver Viaduct project is completed in 2012, this is how the plans for F and V trains in Brooklyn would be... Any comments or if you have heard something like this, please post up your comments, I would very much like to hear on what you have to say on this. What I have to say is: Is your drinking water spiked? Do you normally post opinions as fact...or did you simply not type your post right?
Zman Posted October 22, 2008 #16 Posted October 22, 2008 The should be extended, so the Park Slopers could get local service to Manhattan.The Park Slopers should stop whining. The line is not the best line in the system, but hey, it's better than having none! Some places in the city have no subway access at all. I understand the gripes of those who live in Park Slope. The chances of getting a seat on the are zero and delays are common, especially when a train lays down between Jay and Smith-9 Sts and there's no way to run around.
jacsnyy Posted October 22, 2008 #17 Posted October 22, 2008 I understand the gripes of those who live in Park Slope. The chances of getting a seat on the are zero and delays are common, especially when a train lays down between Jay and Smith-9 Sts and there's no way to run around. I live in the slope, and I have to say unless you live in a VERY specific part on the neighborhood, the is not your only option. (®/(M) at 4th Avenue, (:)/(Q) on Flatbush, (2)/(3) at Bergen or Grand Army, and nearly every train that hits Brooklyn at Atlantic-Pacific Streets.) I think that, though I would like to see the get more respect and maybe add some express service, Park Slope residence can easily stop crying about their problems with the subways, because people form Carroll Gardens and Kensington have ONLY the to deal with without a long shlept to Brooklyn Heights/Flatbush (for Carroll Gardens and Kensington respectively). Not to mention, as previously mentioned, the parts of the city in Brooklyn and Queens without a subway for many miles.
SubwayGuy Posted October 23, 2008 #18 Posted October 23, 2008 nope, there was a G.O recently where the F ran express from jay to church... it went on the local track (did not access lower level) Trains HARDLY EVER use the express tracks when they run express like that, usually they do EXP on the local. Even when they use the express tracks (again, hardly ever), They never stop at Bergen LL. If you look closely you will see a sign directed at Train operators telling them NOT to stop at Bergen LL.
BroadwayBuffer Posted October 23, 2008 #19 Posted October 23, 2008 I remember there used to be blocks across the express tracks with red lights at both ends of the Bergen Lower tracks. (One clearly visible at Carroll St.) Maybe that's why some thought they were blocked, but those are easily removable and have been during certain GOs. Bergen lower is a disaster, there is no way trains could stop there now without serious work being done. There's debris and what looks like storage of various equipment all over the platforms. From what I've seen, trains only pass through there during weekend GOs planned in advance like: "Trains will skip Smith-9th, Carroll, and Bergen Sts."
Kexpress Posted October 23, 2008 #20 Posted October 23, 2008 It's ture about the culver line,there will be express service on the culver in 2012 and the Source is right here http://www.ny1.com/Default.aspx?SecID=1000&ArID=71219
R32 3348 Posted October 23, 2008 #21 Posted October 23, 2008 Express service is a possibility since there is political support for it, but nothing is set in stone yet anyway. Isn't the Culver Viaduct project delayed anyway? Also, what happened to Bergen LL that made it a disaster?
SubwayGuy Posted October 24, 2008 #22 Posted October 24, 2008 Express service is a possibility since there is political support for it, but nothing is set in stone yet anyway. Isn't the Culver Viaduct project delayed anyway? Also, what happened to Bergen LL that made it a disaster? When the upper level was renovated in the early 90's apparently the lower level suffered some damage and all the tile was removed. Not to mention Bergen interlocking hasn't been right since the fire...they've been doing work on it for a while now
Zman Posted October 24, 2008 #23 Posted October 24, 2008 It's ture about the culver line,there will be express service on the culver in 2012 and the Source is right here http://www.ny1.com/Default.aspx?SecID=1000&ArID=71219 Oh please, it doesn't mean that there WILL be express service, it only means that they are considering it.
Luis1985 Posted October 26, 2008 #24 Posted October 26, 2008 Service: Trains can operate on its regular local route between Jay St-Boro Hall and Church Av, Then all local stops to Coney Island, at all times. Service: Trains can operate between Court Sq and Church Av on the Weekdays, and between Either Forest Hills-71 Av or Court Sq and Church Av during late nights and weekends via Local. Service: Trains can operate between Forest Hills-71 Av and Church Ave via Express between Jay St-Boro Hall and Church Av, Weekdays, and express between Church Av and Kings Highway during rush hours (To Manhattan AM, From Manhattan PM). Other Times use the as an alterante. Everybody is already used to taking the as the "Culver Local". theyre eventually gonna make the make all stops between Bergen St and Church Av. so whats the point of the train being local in brooklyn? make it go express in Brooklyn.
7LineFan Posted October 30, 2008 #25 Posted October 30, 2008 Service:Trains can operate on its regular local route between Jay St-Boro Hall and Church Av, Then all local stops to Coney Island, at all times. Service: Trains can operate between Court Sq and Church Av on the Weekdays, and between Either Forest Hills-71 Av or Court Sq and Church Av during late nights and weekends via Local. Service: Trains can operate between Forest Hills-71 Av and Church Ave via Express between Jay St-Boro Hall and Church Av, Weekdays, and express between Church Av and Kings Highway during rush hours (To Manhattan AM, From Manhattan PM). Other Times use the as an alterante. Everybody is already used to taking the as the "Culver Local". theyre eventually gonna make the make all stops between Bergen St and Church Av. so whats the point of the train being local in brooklyn? make it go express in Brooklyn. What's the point of even extending the into Brooklyn? It's kinda redundant as both are 6th Avenue locals.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.