4P3607 Posted February 20, 2011 Share #76 Posted February 20, 2011 Here's another video :cool: Another Nice one! :tup::tup: just a question: why was there a on the express tracks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from Maspeth Posted February 20, 2011 Share #77 Posted February 20, 2011 Goodbye R32's, the R160's are taking over! If you've been following the thread, you would know your statement is absolutely false. This is how false rumors start: posts such as yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from Maspeth Posted February 20, 2011 Share #78 Posted February 20, 2011 I KNEW that was coming. I knew that it was a GO fill-in! But that is a pretty rare catch. It had nothing to do with a GO. There was a sick customer requiring reroutes. Follow the thread! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted February 20, 2011 Author Share #79 Posted February 20, 2011 If you've been following the thread, you would know your statement is absolutely false. This is how false rumors start: posts such as yours. It had nothing to do with a GO. There was a sick customer requiring reroutes. Follow the thread! yeah thanks for explaining to them. And you're right on thats how false rumors are started Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2 Train Master Posted February 21, 2011 Share #80 Posted February 21, 2011 Damn look at that REAL train on the middle track at 59th St chillin! Thats the lowest R-32 set married pair in service also 3355/54. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted February 21, 2011 Author Share #81 Posted February 21, 2011 Damn look at that REAL train on the middle track at 59th St chillin! Thats the lowest R-32 set married pair in service also 3355/54. oh wow. Never new that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1447 Posted February 21, 2011 Share #82 Posted February 21, 2011 I disagree, this is actually worth the name. But I do agree that it is used too much since I----nevermind, lets not get into that. lol we wont get into it. But yes it can be used its just overused you know. Thats what i mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted February 21, 2011 Author Share #83 Posted February 21, 2011 lol we wont get into it. But yes it can be used its just overused you know. Thats what i mean yeah thats true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted February 21, 2011 Author Share #84 Posted February 21, 2011 Another Nice one! :tup::tup:just a question: why was there a on the express tracks? there was no On the Express Tracks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4P3607 Posted February 21, 2011 Share #85 Posted February 21, 2011 there was no On the Express Tracks Whoops! typo meant not ! sorry... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from Maspeth Posted February 21, 2011 Share #86 Posted February 21, 2011 Whoops! typo meant not ! sorry... The must have sent that C up the express from Canal due to congestion on the local track. During delays, you do whatever has to be done to get the road moving. Decisions like that are made by dispatchers since they know the overall condition of the railroad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexington Av Local Posted February 21, 2011 Share #87 Posted February 21, 2011 Foam, foam everywhere. It's VERY weird to see NTTs on the . It just doesn't look right. The along with the always ran on the oldest trains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FamousNYLover Posted February 21, 2011 Share #88 Posted February 21, 2011 I almost thought it was for real, but when I look down, I learned it was . Nice catch. Did announcement say like: "This is Washington Heights-bound Local train." "This is 168th St-bound local train." "This is 168th St-bound train. Or did they use both as they used to do it on Crown Heights-Utica Av-bound or Brooklyn College-Flatbush Av-bound express train? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
via White Plains Road Posted February 21, 2011 Share #89 Posted February 21, 2011 I almost thought it was for real, but when I look down, I learned it was . Nice catch. Did announcement say like: "This is Washington Heights-bound Local train." "This is 168th St-bound local train." "This is 168th St-bound train. Or did they use both as they used to do it on Crown Heights-Utica Av-bound or Brooklyn College-Flatbush Av-bound express train? This is a 168th Street bound local train The Next Stop Is Cathedral Parkway-110th Street! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted February 21, 2011 Author Share #90 Posted February 21, 2011 Foam, foam everywhere. It's VERY weird to see NTTs on the . It just doesn't look right. The along with the always ran on the oldest trains. yeah it was and thanks I almost thought it was for real, but when I look down, I learned it was . Nice catch. Did announcement say like: "This is Washington Heights-bound Local train." "This is 168th St-bound local train." "This is 168th St-bound train. Or did they use both as they used to do it on Crown Heights-Utica Av-bound or Brooklyn College-Flatbush Av-bound express train? it said This is 168th Street-bound Local Train This is a 168th Street bound local train The Next Stop Is Cathedral Parkway-110th Street! yeah and thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FamousNYLover Posted February 21, 2011 Share #91 Posted February 21, 2011 Now, I know how to R160 imitate on . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycbusfan Posted February 21, 2011 Share #92 Posted February 21, 2011 Nice, Thats the exact opposite of what you usually find on the . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted February 21, 2011 Author Share #93 Posted February 21, 2011 Nice, Thats the exact opposite of what you usually find on the . yeah the opposites and thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattTrain Posted February 21, 2011 Share #94 Posted February 21, 2011 I give you two big thumbs up, Dan, awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted February 21, 2011 Author Share #95 Posted February 21, 2011 I give you two big thumbs up, Dan, awesome! thanks Matt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ Will Posted February 21, 2011 Share #96 Posted February 21, 2011 Nice catch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PATCOman Posted February 21, 2011 Share #97 Posted February 21, 2011 Slammin catch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted February 21, 2011 Author Share #98 Posted February 21, 2011 Nice catch thanks Slammin catch! thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R32 3838 Posted February 21, 2011 Share #99 Posted February 21, 2011 Thats right guys I caught an R160A-2 Train. Videos coming in a bit Daniel:cool: I Know Those riders were happy as hell only to find out it was a borrowed set from the , The R160's look good on the . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe C Posted February 21, 2011 Share #100 Posted February 21, 2011 I Know Those riders were happy as hell only to find out it was a borrowed set from the , The R160's look good on the . I'm sure those people who rode that one train didn't know that it was borrowed from the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.