bobtehpanda Posted April 9, 2016 Share #2201 Posted April 9, 2016 That is all true (especially under normal circumstances), however, as we are also seeing this year, if you have tight races or where you are potentially looking at a brokered convention, the big urban areas like New York and LA may actually (for once) play a big factor and that is where transit issues could play a factor. Even in urban only races being a transportation focused person does not work. Joe Lhota's experience did not help him gain votes (in fact he lost pretty badly). Chris Christie got reelected despite wrecking the largest transportation project in this nation's history. People at a brokered convention don't care about transportation, they care about bigger things like the economy or foreign policy or even how supporting candidate X will help their prospects in the future. If you were to take a national poll on big issues facing the country, transportation wouldn't even rank. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallyhorse Posted April 9, 2016 Share #2202 Posted April 9, 2016 Even in urban only races being a transportation focused person does not work. Joe Lhota's experience did not help him gain votes (in fact he lost pretty badly). Chris Christie got reelected despite wrecking the largest transportation project in this nation's history. People at a brokered convention don't care about transportation, they care about bigger things like the economy or foreign policy or even how supporting candidate X will help their prospects in the future. If you were to take a national poll on big issues facing the country, transportation wouldn't even rank. Yes, but seemingly minor issues that 99.99% of the general population doesn't care about can play into the outcome of an election. The Democrats learned that lesson the hard way in 2000 with Elian Gonzalez. The widely held belief there was if Clinton had issued an Executive Order that barred his father from taking his son back to Cuba (taking him back was against his late mother's wishes), many Cuban-Americans in Miami who even now have an extremely deep hatred for Castro would have voted for Al Gore solely on that one issue and Gore would have won Florida in 2000 by 100,000+ votes. That was where something only .01% of the country cared about decided the Presidential election. That's why I say transit is one of those "minor" issues that 99.99% don't care about that in an extremely tight race can make the difference. That was the lesson learned from 2000. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moody Posted April 12, 2016 Share #2203 Posted April 12, 2016 When the second ave line goes into operation, I believe it will create a hiring boom and stimulate more jobs for the mta. After that they will start working on ways to fix other issues and plan for rebuilding lag airport. Maybe they'll add a line from the south brooklyn to queens not touching Manhattan. Why didn't think of this? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bstar1 Posted April 12, 2016 Share #2204 Posted April 12, 2016 We already have the doing that with other subway connections in Brooklyn or walking distance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobtehpanda Posted April 12, 2016 Share #2205 Posted April 12, 2016 When the second ave line goes into operation, I believe it will create a hiring boom and stimulate more jobs for the mta. After that they will start working on ways to fix other issues and plan for rebuilding lag airport. Maybe they'll add a line from the south brooklyn to queens not touching Manhattan. Why didn't think of this? There's barely enough money for the MTA as it is. Also, LGA is Port Authority. We already have the doing that with other subway connections in Brooklyn or walking distance. It doesn't really connect the two in a way that is actually faster than going through Manhattan, though. The holy grail of cross-borough commuting is Triboro RX. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moody Posted April 13, 2016 Share #2206 Posted April 13, 2016 There's barely enough money for the MTA as it is. Also, LGA is Port Authority. It doesn't really connect the two in a way that is actually faster than going through Manhattan, though. The holy grail of cross-borough commuting is Triboro RX. Cities infrastructure is very old. Lag airport is one of the worst airports in the US. I know its part of PA. But part of the reason why its terrible is because of its location. So improvements in the airport and around better transportation means a better vibrant business metropolis. They announced that lag airport will be reconstructed. And with reconstructed airports comes better convenient transportation. Jfk airport is a very nice airport. But it can take someone from the city about 90 minutes to 2 hrs to get to it by car. You guys know this. You need to improve it. The E train....I never heard anyone taking the train to jfk unless they work there. No one uses that. It takes just as long. Also. Imagine if you're bay ridge brooklyn and you can take a subway straigh to forest hills. Just cut right through. Do you know how much time people would save? To get to brooklyn from queens you have to go to the city first. This isn't 1900's anymore. With better transportation you have a better productive society. Especially in nyc. They have the money. Just like when they had that surplus that came outta no where. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bstar1 Posted April 13, 2016 Share #2207 Posted April 13, 2016 R connects to in Brooklyn at 4 Av/9 St. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TransitJusticeForAll Posted April 14, 2016 Share #2208 Posted April 14, 2016 Second Avenue Subway Phase I Hearing http://www.nyctransitforums.com/forums/topic/48961-second-avenue-subway-phase-i-hearing/ Enjoy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted April 14, 2016 Author Share #2209 Posted April 14, 2016 Such a beautiful rendering of the future two-track station. But we’ll never see a modern 21st century 3 or 4-track station in our lifetimes. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDNQ2345 Posted April 14, 2016 Share #2210 Posted April 14, 2016 Second Avenue Subway Phase I Hearing http://www.nyctransitforums.com/forums/topic/48961-second-avenue-subway-phase-i-hearing/ Enjoy. I hope they extend the to Bay Pkwy for helping the and the in Brooklyn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobtehpanda Posted April 14, 2016 Share #2211 Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) Cities infrastructure is very old. Lag airport is one of the worst airports in the US. I know its part of PA. But part of the reason why its terrible is because of its location. So improvements in the airport and around better transportation means a better vibrant business metropolis. They announced that lag airport will be reconstructed. And with reconstructed airports comes better convenient transportation. Jfk airport is a very nice airport. But it can take someone from the city about 90 minutes to 2 hrs to get to it by car. You guys know this. You need to improve it. The E train....I never heard anyone taking the train to jfk unless they work there. No one uses that. It takes just as long. Also. Imagine if you're bay ridge brooklyn and you can take a subway straigh to forest hills. Just cut right through. Do you know how much time people would save? To get to brooklyn from queens you have to go to the city first. This isn't 1900's anymore. With better transportation you have a better productive society. Especially in nyc. They have the money. Just like when they had that surplus that came outta no where. The airport is 35 minutes from Penn with the LIRR, with similar time from Atlantic. If you can afford to go to the airport, you can afford to pay a higher train or cab fare. The only reliable markets for airports are workers and business people, and even those aren't particularly strong ridership bases; spending more on airport transit would be a waste of money if it wouldn't have a dependable riderbase. Edited April 14, 2016 by bobtehpanda 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted April 14, 2016 Share #2212 Posted April 14, 2016 The airport is 35 minutes from Penn with the LIRR, with similar time from Atlantic. If you can afford to go to the airport, you can afford to pay a higher train or cab fare. The only reliable markets for airports are workers and business people, and even those aren't particularly strong ridership bases; spending more on airport transit would be a waste of money if it wouldn't have a dependable riderbase. Not always true. You can bank on riders who work at the airport and non business travelers. While it may seem random, you can always bank on a certain amount of riders trying to get to an airport even if they aren't the same people traveling over and over again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobtehpanda Posted April 15, 2016 Share #2213 Posted April 15, 2016 Not always true. You can bank on riders who work at the airport and non business travelers. While it may seem random, you can always bank on a certain amount of riders trying to get to an airport even if they aren't the same people traveling over and over again. By workers, I meant airport employees. Non-business travel is very erratic, and it's not as if those travelers are in particular need of it so much as it is a desire. In fact airport rail lines, especially those that are purpose built, tend to perform rather poorly compared to other transit investments. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Threxx Posted April 17, 2016 Share #2214 Posted April 17, 2016 I was reading the thread (good job on getting way off topic guys, just like old times) and multiple kept bring up extending the or to 149th Street in the Bronx... I want to attempt to address that realistically. The cost of a new underwater tube would be astronomical. Look at how expensive East Side Access has become on the LIRR. Obviously since the Harlem River is much smaller than the East River, the costs would be lower, but that is the first problem. The second issue would be the timing of such an extension. Would you propose it take priority over Phases 3 and 4, or come after those are both done? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted April 18, 2016 Share #2215 Posted April 18, 2016 The idea was that Phase 2 should go into the Bronx instead of making an expensive deep tunnel curve to 125th and Lex. The extension would provide additional service in the Hub and connections to the and Bronx buses. This would also allow for two Bronx branches in the future(one routing for the and one for the ). With the current proposal one of the two must serve 125 St, if one goes to the Bronx at all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Threxx Posted April 19, 2016 Share #2216 Posted April 19, 2016 The idea was that Phase 2 should go into the Bronx instead of making an expensive deep tunnel curve to 125th and Lex. The extension would provide additional service in the Hub and connections to the and Bronx buses. This would also allow for two Bronx branches in the future(one routing for the and one for the ). With the current proposal one of the two must serve 125 St, if one goes to the Bronx at all. The current plan to build the 125th Street station at Lex and then have the or run to the Bronx using the northern provision is rather dumb, since it means that all Bronx 2nd Avenue trains would have to bypass 125th Street, unless they moved the station. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted April 19, 2016 Author Share #2217 Posted April 19, 2016 The idea was that Phase 2 should go into the Bronx instead of making an expensive deep tunnel curve to 125th and Lex. The extension would provide additional service in the Hub and connections to the and Bronx buses. This would also allow for two Bronx branches in the future(one routing for the and one for the ). With the current proposal one of the two must serve 125 St, if one goes to the Bronx at all.The saving grace is that the limitation imposed by this setup may one day force the MTA to build express tracks or yet another trunk running parallel to 2 Avenue. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric B Posted April 19, 2016 Share #2218 Posted April 19, 2016 Mention of extra track (which should not have been cut out of 72nd St.) reminds me of today's big news regarding that station: http://secondavenuesagas.com/2016/04/18/16261/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Javier Posted April 19, 2016 Share #2219 Posted April 19, 2016 Well if we live to see the day, 72nd St can be rebuilt into a two platform station, just like Nevins St. However, if the IND Second Avenue line was suppose to stop at Nevins St (since Nevins was suppose to become the central hub in Brooklyn) that means that if the 2016 Second Avenue Line will be extended into Brooklyn, why can't it terminate at South 4 St like it was originally suppose to? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance Posted April 19, 2016 Share #2220 Posted April 19, 2016 The current plan to build the 125th Street station at Lex and then have the or run to the Bronx using the northern provision is rather dumb, since it means that all Bronx 2nd Avenue trains would have to bypass 125th Street, unless they moved the station. I can tell you this, if the station is at 125th Street and Lexington Ave, it's staying there. The saving grace is that the limitation imposed by this setup may one day force the MTA to build express tracks or yet another trunk running parallel to 2 Avenue. Yeah, that's not happening. If they were going to install express tracks, they'd have to go under the already existing tracks since 2nd Avenue is not wide enough for four tracks side by side. Either that or build them on either 1st Avenue or 3rd Avenue, both options pretty much dead on arrival. Mention of extra track (which should not have been cut out of 72nd St.) reminds me of today's big news regarding that station: http://secondavenuesagas.com/2016/04/18/16261/ I'm shocked I tell you. Simply shocked. Well if we live to see the day, 72nd St can be rebuilt into a two platform station, just like Nevins St. However, if the IND Second Avenue line was suppose to stop at Nevins St (since Nevins was suppose to become the central hub in Brooklyn) that means that if the 2016 Second Avenue Line will be extended into Brooklyn, why can't it terminate at South 4 St like it was originally suppose to? Let's just get downtown first... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobtehpanda Posted April 19, 2016 Share #2221 Posted April 19, 2016 I, personally, wouldn't mind if they built a second pair of turnouts facing east from 125. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onthe1train Posted April 20, 2016 Share #2222 Posted April 20, 2016 ...If they were going to install express tracks, they'd have to go under the already existing tracks... What is the feasibility of this? I know it's very different now, but isn't this essentially what was done with the 6th Av express tracks? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Threxx Posted April 20, 2016 Share #2223 Posted April 20, 2016 What is the feasibility of this? I know it's very different now, but isn't this essentially what was done with the 6th Av express tracks? 6th Avenue is... complicated. The express tracks are in between and below the local tracks, which themselves are above the PATH tracks. So in order of depth... 6th Avenue Local PATH 6th Avenue Express The tracks under 6th Avenue are a mess due to things being completed at different times so it's rather confusing. 2nd Avenue likely wouldn't have similar issues, the only problem there is money. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted April 20, 2016 Author Share #2224 Posted April 20, 2016 I, personally, wouldn't mind if they built a second pair of turnouts facing east from 125. …to Astoria? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onthe1train Posted April 20, 2016 Share #2225 Posted April 20, 2016 6th Avenue is... complicated. The express tracks are in between and below the local tracks, which themselves are above the PATH tracks. So in order of depth... 6th Avenue Local PATH 6th Avenue Express The tracks under 6th Avenue are a mess due to things being completed at different times so it's rather confusing. 2nd Avenue likely wouldn't have similar issues, the only problem there is money. Right. The point being, though, is that the express tracks were built below. Especially since the 2nd Av stations are island platforms, it'll make it easy to build right beneath them. If the line is ever extended into the Bronx or down to Brooklyn, they'll need them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.