Grand Concourse Posted January 14, 2010 Share #101 Posted January 14, 2010 Lol, you have a point there. B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted January 14, 2010 Share #102 Posted January 14, 2010 The way i see it, no matter what you call the line, the ones who benefit are the riders who on a daily basis transfer between the F and the J/M/Z at delancey/essex. which from my observations, outnumber the riders who use the M south of essex. "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" And the MTA needs outway its riders. in this case, it may be a win/win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Concourse Posted January 14, 2010 Share #103 Posted January 14, 2010 Ah, I've been waiting for someone to use the vulcan [star trek] line. Interesting, thanks for the observation. And anything is better than the V ending at a useless terminal at 2nd Av. Though given how the V runs more trains on its end, I wouldn't totally rule out maybe a few V's still going to 2nd Av to ease traffic over the bridge. The QB end needs more service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m7zanr160s Posted January 14, 2010 Share #104 Posted January 14, 2010 To me Jamaica might Have to keep those R32's that they have, for extras, As for the R160's that would be a wise choice to run them on the , But you might not have enough so it would be smart to use the 28 R32's at Jamaica, but only rush hours, You can't use the R42's due to the C/R posstion. To be honest I really don't think this is going to happen, It would cost the TA money just to install new boards for R160's on QB and car markers. No other train type choice than R160 (4-car sets), 75-footers are too long. And I notice there are already 8-car markers at V stations anyway. No modification there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m7zanr160s Posted January 14, 2010 Share #105 Posted January 14, 2010 Good breakdown CenSin, lets not forget other pros with the V over the WillyB, less crowds on the F, more people on the V, Which i believe was one of the reasons to create the V besides a 4th QBL train into manhattan. The V is underused. if its southern terminal is extended more peolpe will use it. and its a plus for operations too. the cars needed can come from the M. Since the MTA is in the process of moving their r46s to 207/Pitkin, they could IMO, speed that up. Move whatever 32s left to serve on the V. You now have the problem of where the cars come from and the C/R board locations solved until a more long term solution is made Well said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeystoneRegional Posted January 14, 2010 Share #106 Posted January 14, 2010 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m7zanr160s Posted January 14, 2010 Share #107 Posted January 14, 2010 The way i see it, no matter what you call the line, the ones who benefit are the riders who on a daily basis transfer between the F and the J/M/Z at delancey/essex. which from my observations, outnumber the riders who use the M south of essex. "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" And the MTA needs outway its riders. in this case, it may be a win/win I think we think alike. B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted January 15, 2010 Share #108 Posted January 15, 2010 Although there is something true in ways, the is still much more useful than the , but due to the budget shortful, the extension seems much more reasonable, although the could still be preserved for the future in-case if the Chrystie fails... I doubt Chrystie will fail. There is a pattern based on passenger flow that this service will be used and successful. And when their budget recoups i see the MTA, IMO,expanding Z service past rush hours before they'll reinstate M service. It seems to be the more logical move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeystoneRegional Posted January 15, 2010 Share #109 Posted January 15, 2010 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted January 15, 2010 Share #110 Posted January 15, 2010 Well, we'll see what happens, it will be an interesting run for the though, although I do admit I have a stronger connection/relation with the than the , . thats the thing though. When arguing for something thats getting cut, logic beats emotion. I love the 44s. But their rotting. I wish the could run another decade but logic states that if theyre roting, get rid of them! same logic applies here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeystoneRegional Posted January 15, 2010 Share #111 Posted January 15, 2010 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Line1291 Posted January 15, 2010 Share #112 Posted January 15, 2010 This move w/ combining the and is a good thing. It'll gives Middle Village a one seat ride to Midtown and (J)/(Z) riders easier access to Midtown. I gotta admit, I would like to see and orange M bullet though if this move becomes permanent even after everything is back to normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zman Posted January 16, 2010 Share #113 Posted January 16, 2010 thats the thing though. When arguing for something thats getting cut, logic beats emotion. I love the 44s. But their rotting. I wish the could run another decade but logic states that if theyre roting, get rid of them! same logic applies here. Yes, the is rotting. That's why it's brown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cotb16 Posted January 17, 2010 Share #114 Posted January 17, 2010 The (M)/(V) combo would also make it easier for riders on the West Side, Midtown, and Upper Manhattan to get to stops on the Lower East Side/Williamsburgh/Bushwick such as Marcy Av, Essex St, and Myrtle-Broadway. This combination would also take some loads off the since this goes further north up Midtown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T to Dyre Avenue Posted January 17, 2010 Share #115 Posted January 17, 2010 I hope the does relieve the if it is extended to Metropolitan. We'll have to see what happens with that one. I know posters have said on here that many people transfer from the , and to the at Essex Street, so let's see if former -to- riders would indeed stay on the to Midtown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted January 17, 2010 Share #116 Posted January 17, 2010 I hope the does relieve the if it is extended to Metropolitan. We'll have to see what happens with that one. I know posters have said on here that many people transfer from the , and to the at Essex Street, so let's see if former -to- riders would indeed stay on the to Midtown. Well, the would have connections to most of the lines that the connects to such as the , , , (, , , , , , , , and . This assumes most riders need to access stations in midtown Manhattan on those lines and I'm confident the accomplishes the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted January 22, 2010 Share #117 Posted January 22, 2010 On PIX morning news this morning, a report on the MTA budget cut changes included the MTA announcing one of the changes is the elimination of the M and extending the V. The W is still on the chopping block. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishmech Posted January 22, 2010 Share #118 Posted January 22, 2010 On PIX morning news this morning, a report on the MTA budget cut changes included the MTA announcing one of the changes is the elimination of the M and extending the V. The W is still on the chopping block. Interesting, personally I hope to be on the last and the first that serves the Myrtle line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewoodian Posted January 23, 2010 Share #119 Posted January 23, 2010 Interesting, personally I hope to be on the last and the first that serves the Myrtle line. You know, I was thinking exactly the same thing today. Hope this happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest Glen Posted January 23, 2010 Share #120 Posted January 23, 2010 This is actually an interesting route. I still hate the for screwing over the , but it would be cool to ride from 6th Avenue, over the Willy B, and to Metropolitan Avenue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NX Express Posted January 23, 2010 Share #121 Posted January 23, 2010 Interesting, personally I hope to be on the last and the first that serves the Myrtle line. How can you be on both at the same time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Concourse Posted January 23, 2010 Share #122 Posted January 23, 2010 If it's an R160, it's as easy as a flip of the sign. Also assuming the train isn't being pulled from service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R32 3838 Posted January 23, 2010 Share #123 Posted January 23, 2010 If it's an R160, it's as easy as a flip of the sign. Also assuming the train isn't being pulled from service. The (M)/(V) combo would be mostly R160's with 3 R32 Trainsets or more, The reason why Im saying this is because you are going to need 3+ trains, The is going to be a heavy ridership line when this happens, I support it because atleast this would be something different, The uses 19 Trainsets The New would use The (M)'s equipment. Also I think they should extend the down 4th ave to help the and replace the to ether to 9th ave or Bay Parkway, or just Have the run via lower Manhattan like the 90's, I know that would bring back Hell on Broadway but the can't do it alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilbluefoxie Posted January 23, 2010 Share #124 Posted January 23, 2010 So what happens on weekends, is now the route for the Myrtle Shuttle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m7zanr160s Posted January 23, 2010 Share #125 Posted January 23, 2010 So what happens on weekends, is now the route for the Myrtle Shuttle? From what I read: Yep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.