Jump to content

R188 Discussion Thread


East New York

Recommended Posts

To Be Honest I think the (4) is going to get the R62A's, they already have R62A's for the shuttle at the Jermone yard, so it would make the most sense to give the (4) the R62A's and send the later R142A's to the (6) along with the R142's, this would make the most sense because the (4) only has 1 terminal in both directions thats Utica ave and Woodlawn and late nights New Lots.

 

The Shuttle cars are no longer Jerome assigned, they're back at Livonia for assignment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 7.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The (6) line will struggle to maintain it's 2-3 minute headway if rollsigns have to changed. People seem to forget that the (6) has 2 weekday terminals in the Bronx. As it is on the (7) every train terminates at Flushing-Main Street or Times Square so the t/o doesn't have to worry about the sign. R62A won't work for the (6) unless digital signs AND automated announcements were put in place. In all honesty the best line for these cars is the one that they are currently on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The (6) line will struggle to maintain it's 2-3 minute headway if rollsigns have to changed. People seem to forget that the (6) has 2 weekday terminals in the Bronx. As it is on the (7) every train terminates at Flushing-Main Street or Times Square so the t/o doesn't have to worry about the sign. R62A won't work for the (6) unless digital signs AND automated announcements were put in place. In all honesty the best line for these cars is the one that they are currently on.

 

Remember that the (6) itself had R62As about ten years ago. It worked back then, didn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that the (6) itself had R62As about ten years ago. It worked back then, didn't it?

 

The (6) line has changed in those 10 years. Ridership has increased greatly over those 10 years and the trains now run more frequently than they did 10 years ago. Trains need to run every 2 minutes on this line and having to change signs at Brooklyn Bridge will threaten that precious headway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The (6) line has changed in those 10 years. Ridership has increased greatly over those 10 years and the trains now run more frequently than they did 10 years ago. Trains need to run every 2 minutes on this line and having to change signs at Brooklyn Bridge will threaten that precious headway.

 

OK, then, answer me this. Two part question, and this is the first part, the answer of which will affect the second.

 

All local trains stop at Parkchester while the express trains continue to Pelham Bay Park. Is this true for every single case when express service is running, excluding general orders and other unexpected stuff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, then, answer me this. Two part question, and this is the first part, the answer of which will affect the second.

 

All local trains stop at Parkchester while the express trains continue to Pelham Bay Park. Is this true for every single case when express service is running, excluding general orders and other unexpected stuff?

 

You are correct. Local trains terminate at Parkchester and express trains terminate at Pelham Bay Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that the (6) itself had R62As about ten years ago. It worked back then, didn't it?

 

I just don't understand why this 'simple issue' [R62As to the (6)] has become so difficult to comprehend for some people here. It's not like the cars are 'that' bad or old. R68s have been pretty good on B-division.

Plus R62As are also heavily used on the (7), so it's not like they have been on say the (3) where it needs to run at nearly 2-3 min headways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct. Local trains terminate at Parkchester and express trains terminate at Pelham Bay Park.

 

Assuming regulars know this service pattern, and those LEDs in the side signs of the R62As stay:

 

Trains with the green circle go to Parkchester, and trains with the red diamond go to Pelham Bay Park. Signage problem solved.

 

And before you say that the signs are still incorrect, there are trains on the (7) that get pulled from service at Mets-Willets Point, usually going to the yard after they discharge their passengers. All of them have their signs set to Main St, with the conductor loudly announcing at every station that the train is stopping short.

 

Those LEDs and a loud, clear conductor should be all you need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you bring up good points.The thing was the 62A's would be fit for the (6) line since the LED but some of you/us never really considered the rollsign changing.

The (6) actually has 3 terminals during the day

Pelham Bay Park

Parkchester

3 Av-138th St (During the day several trains end their run there in the AM & PM going uptown and be sent back down) if you ever caught a (6) train announcement saying "This is a Brooklyn Bridge bound (6) local train" that was the train that terminated at 138th and those are not put-ins.

 

Rollsigns can be an issue remember in the B-Division which was a reason why the 68/A's disappeared off the (Q) a while ago after the June 2010 cuts also the 32 (A) didn't last long during stints in 2010.We all know the reason 32's are running on the (A) and 68/A (Q)'s on weekends now so thats off topic.

 

Think about it.It would be smart for the 62A's to go to the (4) it has 1 south terminal during the day and 2 north terminals(Woodlawn and Burnside) and for the PM rush some trains run to Bedford.If anything the LED can work out for the (4)

Woodlawn bound trains can utilize the Green Circle

Burnside or and Bedford Pk trains can utilize the RED Diamond since they run express.Only 3 trains run to BP as an express for the PM rush anyways the rest of the expresses are Burnside bound trains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(6) - ideally since it's a strait up swap

(4) - you could take all the R142As there, but would still need to take the rest from the (6)

 

All in all, it comes down to those 2 lines. As has been stated numerous times: The (6) had R62As before, so what's the big deal of the (6) having them again? It's not the end of the world if the signs aren't set correctly. Plus if anything, the signs would likely be changed in the bronx since there's no time to change them at CH-BB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The (6) actually has 3 terminals during the day

Pelham Bay Park

Parkchester

3 Av-138th St (During the day several trains end their run there in the AM & PM going uptown and be sent back down) if you ever caught a (6) train announcement saying "This is a Brooklyn Bridge bound (6) local train" that was the train that terminated at 138th and those are not put-ins.

 

 

Well, as 7LineFan had said a few posts above, similar issues happen on the (7). There are Queens-bound (7) trains that are scheduled to terminate at Willets Point, but their rollsigns still say to Main St. It's just announced that it's stopping short. As long as the announcer on the 3 Av-bound (6) mentions that it's stopping short (i.e. "This is a 3 AVENUE-138 STREET BOUND (6) train"), the signs won't make THAT big of a difference. Worst case scenario, they'll get off at 3 Av and continue their trip. Not too much of an inconvenience, because if they knew beforehand, they'd still be waiting for another train -- only difference would be waiting in Manhattan opposed to waiting at 3 Av.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They can just do what they did on the 6 before the full conversion of the Kawasaki R142A which was they ran all the redbirds to Pelham Bay Park & all the R62's last stops were set for 3rd Av - 138th Street & Parkchester, But if I had an opinion on where the R62's should go I would say it should go on a line that faces little or no destination sign changes or platform construction work & before placing the R62's on any line the announcements need to be modified to be loud & clear not no loud electrical buzzing sound then the piano but the r62's could work on any line as long as they keep the countdown timers working cause those really tell u where the train is going if the sign isnt being updated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well at least with how much more cars the (6) has over the (7), the (6) won't be 100% R62As.

I wonder {if it ends up being the (6) that gets the R62As back}: would they swap the remaining R142As on the (6) for the (4)'s R142s and make the (4) have all the R142As?

 

I believe that what would be wiser is to split the R62As R142 and the remaining R142As between the (4) and the (6). I think they should split them in a way that both lines have a roughly equal amount of SMEEs and NTTs. So, about 200 R62As will go to the (4) and another 200 to the (6).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, then, answer me this. Two part question, and this is the first part, the answer of which will affect the second.

 

All local trains stop at Parkchester while the express trains continue to Pelham Bay Park. Is this true for every single case when express service is running, excluding general orders and other unexpected stuff?

 

Not exactly, at the end of the PM rush and early evening some locals run to Pelham Bay Park

 

Pelham Bay Park trains leaving Brooklyn Bridge (tripplanner)

 

<6> 6:21

<6> 6:28

<6> 6:36

(6) 6:40

<6> 6:44

<6> 6:52

(6) 6:56

<6> 7:00

<6> 7:08

(6) 7:16

<6> 7:20

(6) 7:25

<6> 7:30

<6> 7:40

(6) 7:45

<6> 7:50

<6> 8:00

(6) 8:05

<6> 8:10

<6> 8:20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.