Vistausss Posted February 21, 2014 Share #1601 Posted February 21, 2014 : implement peak-direction express service on the entire Woodlawn Line on weekdays. : 7-day service to/from Brooklyn College-Faltbush Avenue, have Nereid Avenue trains run express north of East 180th Street, late night extension to Grand Central-42nd Street via Lexington Avenue express and Bronx local. : bring it back and have it run express in peak direction from 96th to 145th Street and Dyckman to 242nd Streets while the stays local. : all service to Far Rockaway-Mott Avenue and have Rockaway Park trains run express in Queens. : operates on weekends with its usual weekday route. : extended to Lefferts Boulevard-Ozone Park whenever it operates. The late night shuttle can stay the same. : implement a new West End peak direction express service, does not have to use the same letter. : during rush hours, have Coney Island trains run express in Brooklyn in either peak direction or both ways depending on section. : expand skip-stop service to the full rush hour frame and in both directions, or have reverse-peak direction trains that originate/terminate at Broadway Junction run express between there and Myrtle Avenue. : rush hour skip-stop service with a new letter, peak or both direction. : have it run express on Broadway on weekdays again. All other services can stay the same. - Would be hard to given that the middle track was never built for express service in the first place... - Will not work, just as last time. Nobody wants the . - Leffers people want the express, not the local. Multiple thread have been locked because they kept bringing up this subject. - This actually seems like a good idea. It used to work before, it could work again. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollOver Posted February 21, 2014 Share #1602 Posted February 21, 2014 There is nothing wrong with the running local in Manhattan 24/7 like many people make it out to be. There are many reasons why its done that way. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vistausss Posted February 21, 2014 Share #1603 Posted February 21, 2014 (edited) There is nothing wrong with the running local in Manhattan 24/7 like many people make it out to be. There are many reasons why its done that way. There's also many reasons why they ran it express before 2010. But Im not saying they should run it express again, I was just going through his list of ideas and the one actually seemed like a good one to me in *comparison* to the rest, but that's all I meant Edited February 21, 2014 by Vistausss 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PATCOman Posted February 22, 2014 Share #1604 Posted February 22, 2014 When the N went express, Broadway had 2 locals. After the 2010 cuts, Broadway still has 2 locals. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XcelsiorBoii4888 Posted February 23, 2014 Share #1605 Posted February 23, 2014 What if the turned into the Brighton local, and terminated at Coney Island, while the ran the Brighton express and terminated at Brighton Beach. Also, the turning into the 8th Ave express and the turning into ten cars and more frequent service. The having an express counterpart and running the West End express to Coney Island on rush hours to and from. The having and express counterpart in Brooklyn to Coney Island during rush hours to and from. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooklyn Posted February 24, 2014 Share #1606 Posted February 24, 2014 What if the turned into the Brighton local, and terminated at Coney Island, while the ran the Brighton express and terminated at Brighton Beach. Also, the turning into the 8th Ave express and the turning into ten cars and more frequent service. The having an express counterpart and running the West End express to Coney Island on rush hours to and from. The having and express counterpart in Brooklyn to Coney Island during rush hours to and from. I would love if the ran local.... But if the ran more frequently, there would probably have to be less service. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quill Depot Posted February 24, 2014 Share #1607 Posted February 24, 2014 extended to Bowling Green late-nights 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Union Tpke Posted February 25, 2014 Share #1608 Posted February 25, 2014 Extra service via QBL Local and otherwise the same as regular service. The point is to bring more capacity. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreatOne2k Posted February 25, 2014 Share #1609 Posted February 25, 2014 service extended until 9:10pm from Brooklyn Bridge City Hall service extended : Weekdays from Dyre to Bowling Green until 10:26pm, from Bowling Green until 11:35pm, Saturdays from Dyre to Bowling Green until 10:21pm, from Bowling Green until 11:30pm, Sundays from Dyre to Bowling Green until 9:57pm, from Bowling Green until 11:05pm 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooklyn Posted February 25, 2014 Share #1610 Posted February 25, 2014 extended to Bowling Green late-nights Excellent idea! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lupojohn Posted February 25, 2014 Share #1611 Posted February 25, 2014 Extend the to Co-Op City. Although just like my to Riverdale-263rd Street, it will never happen, even though it would make plenty of sense due to how busy Co-Op is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeLow Posted February 26, 2014 Share #1612 Posted February 26, 2014 extended to Bowling Green late-nights Excellent idea! Why? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooklyn Posted February 27, 2014 Share #1613 Posted February 27, 2014 Why? For the transfer at Fulton st, especially. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vistausss Posted February 27, 2014 Share #1614 Posted February 27, 2014 Extend the to Co-Op City. Although just like my to Riverdale-263rd Street, it will never happen, even though it would make plenty of sense due to how busy Co-Op is. Not really the best idea. The is only a few blocks away and Norwood is not really the best place when it comes to terminating trains. So a nice, new terminal at Co-Op would be great. The also isn't that far from Co-Op, it even crosses the border with Eastchester to reach Dyre. But I'm in for the because of the wider trains and the better terminal argument. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T to Dyre Avenue Posted February 28, 2014 Share #1615 Posted February 28, 2014 (edited) Not really the best idea. The is only a few blocks away and Norwood is not really the best place when it comes to terminating trains. So a nice, new terminal at Co-Op would be great. The also isn't that far from Co-Op, it even crosses the border with Eastchester to reach Dyre. But I'm in for the because of the wider trains and the better terminal argument. The is a long way off from the , and lines. And the does not cross any border to get to Dyre Ave; it stays entirely within the Bronx. The railroad line the 5 uses to get to and from Dyre did used to continue into Westchester County as the New York, Westchester and Boston Railway, but it has not done so since 1938. The Bronx portion of "the Westchester" was acquired by the City of New York in 1940. Sadly and unfortunately, the Westchester County portion was abandoned and demolished. Virtually no trace of it exists today. The IND originally planned to extend the line east toward what is now Co-Op City (it did not exist at the time those plans were drawn up), but once the City acquired the Westchester line from the City line (just north of Dyre Ave) to East 180th St, they simply incorporated that into the existing subway system and abandoned the plan to extend the D eastward. Edited February 28, 2014 by T to Dyre Avenue 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollOver Posted March 1, 2014 Share #1616 Posted March 1, 2014 extended to Bowling Green late-nights Excellent idea! For the transfer at Fulton st, especially. Eh, no point in extending the night to/from Bowling Green. The already runs local entirely at night anyway. That single one seat ride to/from Fulton Street, Wall Street and Bowling Green still exists. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreatOne2k Posted March 1, 2014 Share #1617 Posted March 1, 2014 (edited) Eh, no point in extending the night to/from Bowling Green. The already runs local entirely at night anyway. That single one seat ride to/from Fulton Street, Wall Street and Bowling Green still exists. Not for those north of 125 St, also it reduces the waiting time for those using the transfer at Fulton and the Staten Island Ferry. Edited March 1, 2014 by GreatOne2k 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drekroid Posted March 1, 2014 Share #1618 Posted March 1, 2014 IRT Dyre Av to Rector St Operates express from 96 St to Chambers StLate nights: Ends at Times SqaureRush Hour: 7½ tph (every 8 minutes), Midday: 5 tph (every 12 minutes)148 St to Flatbush AvOperates express from 96 St to Chambers StLate nights: Runs fully localRush Hour: 15 tph (every 4 minutes), Midday: 10 tph (every 6 minutes)Woodlawn to New LotsOperates express from 125 St to Franklin AvLate nights: Runs fully localRush Hour: 15 tph (every 4 minutes), Midday: 7½ tph (every 8 minutes)241 St to Utica AvOperates express from 125 St to Utica AvRush Hour: Some trains ( ) operate express in the peak direction between Gun Hill Rd and 3 Av/149 stLate nights: Ends at Brooklyn BridgeRush Hour: 15 tph (every 4 minutes), Midday: 7½ tph (every 8 minutes) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jsunflyguy Posted March 1, 2014 Share #1619 Posted March 1, 2014 I believe putting the 3 back to Flatbush would reduce it to 9 cars due to capacity issues in Lenox yard unless things have changed in the last little while. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lupojohn Posted March 1, 2014 Share #1620 Posted March 1, 2014 All that's really doing is switching southern terminals. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jsunflyguy Posted March 1, 2014 Share #1621 Posted March 1, 2014 If that was in relation to my comment, the switching would make it isolated from a yard that can provide full length trains, requiring every to add a car on the yard lead or have a put in from Livonia yard. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drekroid Posted March 1, 2014 Share #1622 Posted March 1, 2014 INDInwood/207 St to Lefferts Blvd & Mott AvOperates express from 168 St to Euclid AvLate nights: Operates between Chambers St and Mott Av only (express to Euclid Av) ( provides late night service to Inwood/207 St, provides late night service to Lefferts Blvd)Rush Hour: 12 tph (every 5 minutes), Midday: 8 tph (every 7½ minutes)168 St to Stillwell Av (via Brighton)Operates express on Sixth Av and Brighton LineLate nights: Operates fully local, between Inwood/207 St and Stillwell AvRush Hour: 12 tph (every 5 minutes), Midday: 7½ tph (every 8 minutes)Norwood/205 St to Euclid Av (Eighth Av Express)Operates express between 145 St and Chambers StLate nights: Operates locally between Columbus Circle and Lefferts BlvdRush Hour: 12 tph (every 5 minutes), Midday: 8 tph (every 7½ minutes)Forest Hills/71 Av to Brighton Beach (Sixth Av Local)Operates fully localLate nights: Does not operateRush Hour: 12 tph (every 5 minutes), Midday: 7½ tph (every 8 minutes)Jamaica Center to Stillwell Av (via Culver)Operates express on Queens BlvdLate nights: Operates fully localRush Hour: 12 tph (every 5 minutes), Midday: 7½ tph (every 8 minutes)Jamaica/179 St to World Trade Center (Sixth Av Local)Operates express between Queensbridge/21 St and Forest Hills/71 Av at all timesRush Hour: 18 tph (every 3 to 4 minutes), Midday: 7½ tph (every 8 minutes)Court Square to Church AvRush Hour: 9 tph (every 6 to 7 minutes), Midday: 7½ tph (every 8 minutes)Broad Channel to Rockaway ParkRush Hour: 6 tph (every 10 minutes), Midday: 4 tph (every 15 minutes) BMT Jamaica Center to Broad StRush Hour: operates express in the peak direction between Broadway Jct and Marcy Av (9 tph) operates between Broad St and Broadway Jct only (9 tph)Rush Hour: 18 tph (every 3 to 4 minutes), Midday: 7½ tph (every 8 minutes) Forest Hills/71 Av to Metropolitan Av (Eighth Av Local)Late nights: Operates between Essex St and Metropolitan Av onlyRush Hour: 9 tph (every 6 to 7 minutes), Midday: 7½ tph (every 8 minutes)96 St/2 Av to Stillwell Av (via Bridge, Sea Beach)Operates express on Broadway and Fourth AvenueLate nights: Operates as shuttle service in Brooklyn only, between 36th St and Stillwell AvRush Hour: 9 tph (every 6 to 7 minutes), Midday: 6 tph (every 10 minutes)96 St/2 Av to Stillwell Av (via Bridge, West End)Operates express on Broadway and Fourth AvenueLate nights: Operates fully local (via Bridge)Rush Hour: 9 tph (every 6 to 7 minutes), Midday: 6 tph (every 10 minutes) & Combined TPH (trunk corridor between 96 St/2 Av and Brooklyn 36 St/4 Av): Rush Hour: 18 tph (every 3 to 4 minutes), Midday: 12 tph (every 5 minutes)Ditmars Blvd to Bay Ridge/95 St (via Tunnel)Operates at all timesRush Hour: 15 tph (every 4 minutes), Midday: 10 tph (every 6 minutes) NOTE: would terminate at 57 St/7 Av (or 63 St) until completion of Second Avenue Line. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenFrancis Posted March 2, 2014 Share #1623 Posted March 2, 2014 (edited) If you're going to split the into two services that terminate so far away from each other, then one of them should have a different letter. Perhaps use U or V for the Co-op City service. I know at one point MTA and/or City planners considered using all or part of the Northeast Corridor r-o-w in the Bronx (then operated by the New York, New Haven and Hartford RR) for 2nd Avenue service to/from Co-op City. The 1968 MTA plan called for 2nd Avenue service to/from Dyre Ave and Pelham Bay Park using the existing and lines up to the points where they got close to the Northeast Corridor and shaving back the platform edges so the existing stations could platform B-Division trains. I thought that was a good plan, but I'm not sure how feasible it would be today, especially considering the MTA tore down the old el structure that would have been used to connect the Dyre Avenue line to the Northeast Corridor r-o-w and built an expanded bus depot in the path of the el's r-o-w (which had been used by New York, Westchester and Boston interurban trains until 1938, then later used for storage after subway service started on the portion of NYW&B r-o-w from Dyre Ave to East 180th St). I would still stick with this routing because its not like every other is heading to 125th, then to the Bronx, since there's a to take it on too, so like during rush hours, one out of every 3 s would go to 125th and weekends, one out of every 4, and late nights only have Bronx and Manhattan service and let the take over 125th to reduce congestion hopefully, so I dont see the issue with making a new train especially since one service, the already follows a similar concept of service, but ewww why convert the IRT lines to B Division standards, that's a lot considering now maintenance shops like East 180th and Westchester, wouldve had to have been expanded, I think its fine as is Edited March 2, 2014 by StevenFrancis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance Posted March 2, 2014 Share #1624 Posted March 2, 2014 I make it a point to not comment too much on this thread. Partly because I don't want to come off as attacking anyone, but mainly because it's your ideas and they aren't particularly bad ideas. At least for the most part. @drekroid: I'm sorry, but I have to touch upon your suggestions because they're quite interesting. On the IRT side of things, sending the 3 as the only 7th Avenue line to Brooklyn would overwhelm that line. That and you'd have a serious overcrowding problem on the platforms at Franklin Av and Nevins St with people transferring between the 3 and Lexington Avenue trains. Concerning the 2, you're over-saturating the South Ferry branch of 7th Avenue by sending both it and the 1 down there. That section hardly needs two lines. Flipping the northern terminals for the 2 and 5 is a novel idea (I haven't seen many calls for it), but if I'm not mistaken, the two lines were flipped many years because Dyre Avenue riders wanted Lexington Avenue and not 7th Avenue. In the B-Division, there are some more questionable line changes. By making the C another 8th Avenue express, you've left the B as the sole local along Central Park West and the E as the 8th Avenue local from 50 St to the World Trade Center. Yes, you've increased the TPH on the B, but you've also turned a one-seat local to local ride between CPW and lower 8th Avenue into a three-seat one. I see you've also flipped the E and F lines (again, novel) and all that'd do is wreck the interlocking at W 4 St and delay all trains running through that station since you'd have trains crossing in front of each other to get to their destinations. Speaking of line flips, you've got the Q on the West End and the D on Brighton (I'll admit, when I saw the D on Brighton, I rolled my eyes [see my response in the Random Thoughts thread for details], but this is new). I'm not sure that would fly well, but it is an interesting idea. There are a couple more things I'd talk about (like why you took the R off Queens Blvd and sent it back to Astoria, how A trains would terminate at Chambers St or the C at 59 St and how Broadway would work with the R as the only local), but these were the most interesting changes I had to address. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollOver Posted March 2, 2014 Share #1625 Posted March 2, 2014 (edited) Lol at some of the proposal posts here in this thread. Edited March 2, 2014 by RollOverMyHead 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.