Jump to content

63rd Street Tunnel Shutdown Begins Last week in August.


RTOMan

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, BelieveinMe said:

The M line has become a vital service, needing a service enhancement at both ends of the line.

The word “vital” isn’t how the MTA and bean counters are using the word. Relative to people who use the (M) and nothing else, of course it’s vital. But tell me what part of the subway system the (M) serves that no other route already serves? Only the Myrtle Avenue branch. The (M) is small fry in a big pond along with the (B), (S), and (W).

6 hours ago, BelieveinMe said:

What the MTA has done was make the best of bad decisions it has made in the past.

The choice to route express trains through 63rd was to reduce delays, and make the route useful.

The glaring missing link is, of course, the Queens Bypass route, that was essential to the 63rd st Tunnel's very existence.

The F was a compromise for the missing services, but never managed to live up to expectations.

The Night service is backwards also... however, the length of the F line makes over night express service necessary for crew comfort.

You got it here. It’s always about compromises whether it’s, routing around the tracks that do exist (as opposed to fantasy ones that do not), getting the best service bang for the buck (within the morass of the agency’s fiscal inefficiencies), evening out traffic (despite sending passengers where they do not want to be), or placating the union, the NYC subway is an average of all the necessities being met.

So while I agree that all of this is nice (if we had a boatload of cash to keep it going):

7 hours ago, BelieveinMe said:

Flipping the F and M East River crossing would make sense here.

7 hours ago, BelieveinMe said:

The F using 63rd st practically bypassing a key section of LIC hasn't worked for a large demographic.

They won’t happen without around-the-clock (M) service and station enhancements to mitigate the dangers of overcrowding Lexington Avenue/53 Street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 468
  • Created
  • Last Reply
8 hours ago, BelieveinMe said:

Flipping the F and M East River crossing would make sense here.

No, for reason I laid out months ago, it is not a good idea.

Unless the M becomes a 24/7 full length line, the F will have to return to 63rd street every evening. The last timetabled M out of 71st is about 8:30.

 

the other issue is you’re cutting the QB locals off from the G without transferring multiple times.

 

as it is, the E and F do not fit into the 53rd street tube at full capacity. They had to cut back on some service to compensate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One small problem:

The (M) as you would do it would skip Queens Plaza.  While many in Manhattan are with and one-block walk of the (R) or can transfer to the (R) from the (F) at 34th or Queens Plaza, it still would for some be a considerable inconvience.

You also would have to likely make the (M) a 24/7 line for it to work (with the (E) remaining a local late-nights since one line would need to serve Queens Plaza and the local stations unless you want to late nights bring the (G) back to QBL late nights).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kamen Rider said:

No, for reason I laid out months ago, it is not a good idea.

Unless the M becomes a 24/7 full length line, the F will have to return to 63rd street every evening. The last timetabled M out of 71st is about 8:30.

 

the other issue is you’re cutting the QB locals off from the G without transferring multiple times.

 

as it is, the E and F do not fit into the 53rd street tube at full capacity. They had to cut back on some service to compensate.

53rd st had a 30tph headway Built into the old system.

With CBTC, whenever they actually finish the entire set up,trains will be able to travel closer together.

The reason Why service was reduced was due to CBTC work being carried out east of Kew Gardens.

As far as the local services being cut off from the G line, this is the MTAs fault for removing the G from QB in the first place.

The M certainly needs an upgrade,as shown during the late night SAS service pattern, with riders packed on up to 2 am when the service went to bed for the night.

24hr M service would actually work out better in the long And short run.

The Current E and F services are down to 12 tph each, with no 179 E service.

Trackwork/CBTC within the 63 st tunnel played into the CURRENT SERVICE PATTERN, and that's what we are dealing with CURRENTY.

Im wondering why they needed to rebuild an previously "rebuilt tracked" so thoroughly...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BelieveinMe said:

Im wondering why they needed to rebuild an previously "rebuilt tracked" so thoroughly...

Much of that track (or at least the framework for that track) was originally laid down in the early 1970's and was/is over 50 years old.  There likely were some serious cracks and they had to go all the way to the foundation to get at those.
 

7 hours ago, Kamen Rider said:

the other issue is you’re cutting the QB locals off from the G without transferring multiple times.

as it is, the E and F do not fit into the 53rd street tube at full capacity. They had to cut back on some service to compensate.

I wasn't even thinking about the (G) other than possibly having to bring that back onto QBL late nights.  Yes, there are those who do transfer at Court Square to the (G) and an (M) running local would miss that.

Either you would need the (R) also running 24/7 or the (G) as noted brought back onto QBL late nights. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, at this point, they have still not added any extension to the GO to the planned service changes page… and infact have added another GO.

Northbound platform at Northern Blvd will be closed for accessibility work starting April 8th… and the weekday posts specifically mention the M…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kamen Rider said:

So, at this point, they have still not added any extension to the GO to the planned service changes page… and infact have added another GO.

Northbound platform at Northern Blvd will be closed for accessibility work starting April 8th… and the weekday posts specifically mention the M…

Maybe they'll have 63rd street finished.. Finally...

That 12-9 at Lex ave NB totally wrecked the (E) (F) and (R)  yesterday evening...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, RTOMan said:

Maybe they'll have 63rd street finished.. Finally...

That 12-9 at Lex ave NB totally wrecked the (E) (F) and (R)  yesterday evening...

No points for guessing who was trying to shuffle her way up 6th Avenue on a Mikey in the middle of all that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is interesting though: the weekend of April 12-15 had Queens-bound (E)(F)(R) trains bypassing 36 St to 65th Street, with the planned work post explicitly stating to take the (F) to 21-Queensbridge for Queens-bound (F) service. Unless something happens, signs are pointing to an end-of-month completion of the 63rd Street reconstruction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(F)(M) service will be restored back to normal on April 1st according to the MTA https://new.mta.info/press-release/mta-announces-regular-service-being-restored-f-and-m-lines-following-critical-track the swap isn’t permanent by the way like many people speculated, (F) will continue to run via 63rd street and (M) via 53rd street

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Chris89292 said:

(F)(M) service will be restored back to normal on April 1st according to the MTA https://new.mta.info/press-release/mta-announces-regular-service-being-restored-f-and-m-lines-following-critical-track the swap isn’t permanent by the way like many people speculated, (F) will continue to run via 63rd street and (M) via 53rd street

This decision is not good to me. I've been going to Queens via QBL before and during the shutdown, and the (F)via 53rd Street did help with the delays near Queens Plaza, where trains interfere with one another.

 It is best for the (M)to run via 63rd Street, and continue running on the local tracks to Forest Hills, and allow for the (F)to be via 53rd Street. This service pattern is popular with riders, and it is sadly being thrown out of the window in favor of how it was prior to the shutdown.

Edited by RSMG106
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, RSMG106 said:

This decision is not good to me. I've been going to Queens via QBL before and during the shutdown, and the (F)via 53rd Street did help with the delays near Queens Plaza, where trains interfere with one another.

 It is best for the (M)to run via 63rd Street, and continue running on the local tracks to Forest Hills, and allow for the (F)to be via 53rd Street. This service pattern is popular with riders, and it is sadly being thrown out of the window in favor of how it was prior to the shutdown.

Riders are going to complain about the lack of weekend service on the 63rd St Line and I doubt the (MTA) wants to put money to have the (M) be extended and run full-length trains again on weekends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Kingsbridgeviewer382 said:

Riders are going to complain about the lack of weekend service on the 63rd St Line and I doubt the (MTA) wants to put money to have the (M) be extended and run full-length trains again on weekends.

The (M) could run to 21st queens bridge on nights and weekends meaning the (M) is 24/7 in Manhattan. But the only drawback is less TPH on the (E) / (F). The Drawback of the (M) going via 53rd is the merge at Queens Plaza. Both have pros and Cons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RSMG106 said:

This decision is not good to me. I've been going to Queens via QBL before and during the shutdown, and the (F)via 53rd Street did help with the delays near Queens Plaza, where trains interfere with one another.

 It is best for the (M)to run via 63rd Street, and continue running on the local tracks to Forest Hills, and allow for the (F)to be via 53rd Street. This service pattern is popular with riders, and it is sadly being thrown out of the window in favor of how it was prior to the shutdown.

So what's the plan for nights and weekends?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they will be done with 63rd street come April 1st  (im sure with a few GOs for punch work a shutdown weekend)..

Service patterns will go back to how it was before (F) 63rd,(M) 53rd...

For those who wish (and i mean wish) for the flip flop not happening because the (M) will be cut back as it is already and just adding more switch movement in the 36th street area just isn't worth the CBTC glitch factor.

It Glitches out often in that area.

Weekend late night late evening service however might be different (ill really find out once i see that supplement)..

(E) (F) service local a bit more so no more Full time (F) express service in Queens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, R32 3838 said:

The (M) could run to 21st queens bridge on nights and weekends meaning the (M) is 24/7 in Manhattan. But the only drawback is less TPH on the (E) / (F). The Drawback of the (M) going via 53rd is the merge at Queens Plaza. Both have pros and Cons.

Not happening..

Yet;)....

When they get CBTC up and running in Queens then we could see things like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/19/2024 at 11:46 PM, R32 3838 said:

The (M) could run to 21st queens bridge on nights and weekends meaning the (M) is 24/7 in Manhattan. But the only drawback is less TPH on the (E) / (F). The Drawback of the (M) going via 53rd is the merge at Queens Plaza. Both have pros and Cons.

Why would there be less TPH on the (E) / (F) ? Do the switches south of 5th/53rd have a lower capacity than the switches south of 36th St in Queens?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JSLR7 said:

Why would there be less TPH on the (E) / (F) ? Do the switches south of 5th/53rd have a lower capacity than the switches south of 36th St in Queens?

When they made the (F) go via 63rd, It allowed them to add more (E) and (F) service. This is why you had the 4-5 (E) trains out of 179th. They couldn't do this when both lines went via 53rd and back then the (E) was all R32s while the (F) was all R46s creating dwell times at lex and 53rd. Now with the (E) and (F) being all 60 tech trains, It could be possible with improvements with CBTC but as of right now it's best for them to leave as it is until they can fix the CBTC glitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, R32 3838 said:

It could be possible with improvements with CBTC but as of right now it's best for them to leave as it is until they can fix the CBTC glitches.

That shouldn’t be the case when ATO is in  full effect right now but anything can still happen. 

 

On 3/20/2024 at 9:38 AM, RTOMan said:

For those who wish (and i mean wish) for the flip flop not happening because the (M) will be cut back as it is already and just adding more switch movement in the 36th street area just isn't worth the CBTC glitch factor.

The more I think about it, the more I realize that I’m having a hard time finding drawbacks with a hypothetical (F) and (M) Swap. The only things that stick out to me are the rise in Operating Costs (considering that the (F) would simply continue on 63rd when the (M) is not running) and the fact that those between Roosevelt and Queens Plaza lose out on a one seat ride to a Court Square transfer and the fact.
 

Either way, the return to full service is a welcoming one (even though the (F) via 53rd was convenient for me personally) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/19/2024 at 10:53 PM, RSMG106 said:

 

 It is best for the (M)to run via 63rd Street, and continue running on the local tracks to Forest Hills, and allow for the (F)to be via 53rd Street. This service pattern is popular with riders, and it is sadly being thrown out of the window in favor of how it was prior to the shutdown.

Ironically, that's part of the problem right there. Everyone loves the (E)(F) down 53rd st so much so that by the 1990s Lex/53rd was dangerously overcrowded. I want the (F)/(M) swap too, but that might be part of the MTA's calculus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/20/2024 at 9:38 AM, RTOMan said:

Yes they will be done with 63rd street come April 1st  (im sure with a few GOs for punch work a shutdown weekend)..

Service patterns will go back to how it was before (F) 63rd,(M) 53rd...

For those who wish (and i mean wish) for the flip flop not happening because the (M) will be cut back as it is already and just adding more switch movement in the 36th street area just isn't worth the CBTC glitch factor.

It Glitches out often in that area.

Weekend late night late evening service however might be different (ill really find out once i see that supplement)..

(E) (F) service local a bit more so no more Full time (F) express service in Queens.

I can't see them letting the (F) go local late nights. People already have ridiculous bus rides just to get to Jamaica to make everything local would set everyone off. CBTC work is one thing but I don't see the MTA being let off the hook for that one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.