dman1455 Posted March 10, 2011 Share #126 Posted March 10, 2011 I dunno if the G.O. will happen... It seems like it happens every year :confused: What G.O? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvega961 Posted March 10, 2011 Share #127 Posted March 10, 2011 What G.O? He probably Means the to Coney and the to Euclid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4P3607 Posted March 10, 2011 Share #128 Posted March 10, 2011 What G.O? to Euclid Avenue via the line. via the Culver Line to C.I. fish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresh Pond Posted March 10, 2011 Share #129 Posted March 10, 2011 It would be weird to see something that is a mix between the R160 & 143. It has the AdTranz Propulsion, but it looks like an R160, has R160 interior LED signs, and doesn't have that LED sign on the side that usually advertises Access-a-ride. I don't know if it would have a FIND or strip map. Just to let you know kid, my post was total sarcasm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4P3607 Posted March 10, 2011 Share #130 Posted March 10, 2011 Just to let you know kid, my post was total sarcasm I know! but still that would be an interesting train! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cait Sith Posted March 10, 2011 Share #131 Posted March 10, 2011 It "could" but that's not the case. They would only put R68's on the . That's the plan, NOT R160's. Now see, we can't officially say that until the pick happens. In the MTA, things change in a flash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted March 10, 2011 Share #132 Posted March 10, 2011 Just to let you know kid, my post was total sarcasm Sarcasm, it's a fine art that some people just don't get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m7zanr160s Posted March 10, 2011 Share #133 Posted March 10, 2011 I wonder if the MTA will borrow trains from other systems to make up for the tentative crap-out of the R32s A/C this summer. That'll be very interesting. What exactly goes wrong with those R32 A/C units? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R44 CNG Posted March 10, 2011 Share #134 Posted March 10, 2011 If they did move the R160 to the ( would it be because of the two different northern terminals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dman1455 Posted March 10, 2011 Share #135 Posted March 10, 2011 What exactly goes wrong with those R32 A/C units? There old... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted March 10, 2011 Share #136 Posted March 10, 2011 What exactly goes wrong with those R32 A/C units? There old... Not only that but their HVACs don't work very well underground. However I don't recall something like this happening in 2009 at all, that year the R32s were fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Concourse Posted March 11, 2011 Share #137 Posted March 11, 2011 If they did move the R160 to the ( would it be because of the two different northern terminals? I doubt it because it's not like the uses 2 terminals at the same time. It is rush hours and middays. Plenty of time to change the signs back. The only reason any would end up on the is if the are 100% R160s and there's no more trains to displace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoTimer Posted March 11, 2011 Share #138 Posted March 11, 2011 Couple of thoughts... What's going to happen to Church Av lower (where as many as 7 trains can be stored and still have room for relays)... Why wouldnt they just move the 46s down to CIY and store them there, its not THAT many trains now... line supt himself said he heard nothing about 68's going on his line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Concourse Posted March 11, 2011 Share #139 Posted March 11, 2011 Well ask the OP, he was the one who copied the very title from a subchat thread. I may like the idea of R68s on the or the moving to CIY, but I take this talk with a grain of salt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric B Posted April 5, 2011 Share #140 Posted April 5, 2011 The current ERA Bulletin that just came out also mentions this. I hadn't heard about it recently, and thought it was dropped, at least for now. I can't understand why they are pushing this, instead of the 160's. It's a line that runs OPTO on weekends, and I belive they're thinking of expanding it, and that is pretty long for OPTO. Both the 68's and 46's have all been retrofitted with enablers now, and on this equipment that was not originally built for it, the T/O has to enable himself! (The NTT's disable the feature when both the controller and door panel are activated in the same position). What are they thinking about? Why can't they just put 160's there? From what I understood, the 60 R160A2's (8600's), were specifically ordered for the . They should just put those on there like originally planned, and then the 46's would either go to Queens, and push some of the 160's to CI (including the CI set used for the seating test, which I believe is over), or in light of this whole 32/46 shift on the mentioned here, they might have to send 32's back to CI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMTKateMeltonLine Posted April 10, 2011 Share #141 Posted April 10, 2011 No, it can't be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r40s 4501 Posted April 10, 2011 Share #142 Posted April 10, 2011 R32 On(A)( train Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainfan22 Posted April 10, 2011 Share #143 Posted April 10, 2011 R32 On(A)( train Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe C Posted April 10, 2011 Share #144 Posted April 10, 2011 R32 On(A)( train You really need to work on your grammer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Concourse Posted April 10, 2011 Share #145 Posted April 10, 2011 Big time. I mean is he making a statement or a question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadcruiser1 Posted April 11, 2011 Share #146 Posted April 11, 2011 He's just a trolling foamer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTK246 Posted April 11, 2011 Share #147 Posted April 11, 2011 You really need to work on your grammer. Grammar*. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.