Jump to content

MTA Bus Operations: Fleet & Depots


East New York

Recommended Posts

so by contrast, 8090-8119 from ENY will go "back" to JA, and 8120-8124 from ENY will transfer to Charleston. Castleton has 8125-8134 at this time, but will go to its neighbor, CH


New Nova LFS assignments:
8090-8119, 8399-8480: Jamaica (112)
8120-8184: Charleston (65)
8185-8251: Castleton (66)
8252-8317: Yukon (66)
8318-8358: Gun Hill (41)
8359-8398: Kingsbridge (40)
8481-8503: Queens Village (23)
The main XD40 order is finished, and Stengel's order is about done. At this moment, SI is getting their LFS and JA is getting ready to steal ENY'S LFS. Give it some time as the entire order may not finish until 2016 or 2017.
As for the rest of the option order, me or someone else may post the data later on as I remember some of that data being posted somewhere on the forums.

so no Manhattan depots are listed to get newer buses at this time

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

so by contrast, 8090-8119 from ENY will go "back" to JA, and 8120-8124 from ENY will transfer to Charleston. Castleton has 8125-8134 at this time, but will go to its neighbor, CH

 

so no Manhattan depots are listed to get newer buses at this time

Manhattan may get Staten Island's leftovers. Some of their buses may be heading to the main land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The option order still hasn't been awarded yet, nor do we know who getting them

The first post of the thread:

Last Update 7/27/15

[*]Award 628 standard (revised options) 40 foot buses (NYCT) to either New Flyer or Nova (Active Options for an additional 420 pending. 72 options were exercised and awarded to New Flyer)

Oh and apparently there is ANOTHER Nova LFS assignment change shortly after my post of the changes. So far, it seems QV will send all of their LFS to JA. More info on the changes coming soon. Edited by MysteriousBtrain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the  208  remaning   bus is this open ended  contact. can they  award  this  at any time  to new flyer or  nova bus.

what  is  buses  are getting repowed and this  also exended there life  beyond  the 12 years.

how long does it take  a buses to be pull from service  and to be for scrap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the 208 remaning bus is this open ended contact. can they award this at any time to new flyer or nova bus.

what is buses are getting repowed and this also exended there life beyond the 12 years.

how long does it take a buses to be pull from service and to be for scrap.

The 208 buses can get awarded at anytime. Scrap, retired buses would go immediately to ech and wait there to determine their fate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok this should be the official lfs assignment roster as of now:

8090-8119, 8399-8503: Jamaica (135)

8120-8184: Charleston (65)

8185-8251: Castleton (66)

8252-8317: Yukon (66)

8318-8358: Gun Hill (41)

8359-8398: Kingsbridge (40)

Only thing that changed is that the QV order was given to Jamaica to make 135 buses in total for that depot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry

I ment can some post all orders and options for new buses for

last 2 years

Every order since 2014 is on the first page of the thread.

Anything prior to that try searching the web or something idk if that info is here (anymore) on the forums.

Edited by MysteriousBtrain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this isn't the first time that a depot has more than 3/4 of the fleet.

In 1991, OF (later MCH) had 3/4s of the 1990-1991 TMC RTS buses: 8000-8089, 8170-8185, 8270-8292 & 8340-8354 before the latter 3 list (8170-8185, 8270-8292 & 8350-8354) went to MV in 1993

In 1993, CS had 2/3s of the Orion 5s: 173-254, 292-299 & 306-316

in 1999, the 2 older SI depots together had the Orion 5s 6140-6349, with CA getting 6140-6259

the same year, YU had the bulk of MCI 102WDSS 1860-1989

When MTA Bus was born in 2004, 3 years later, CP (formally QSC) started out with just 60 MCIs. it grew to 165 since then.

When WF opened in 2003, Orion 7 CNGs 7660-7819 found themselves a home there.

 

Larger fleets do find themselves in one depot  

Edited by FLX9304
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok this should be the official lfs assignment roster as of now:

8090-8119, 8399-8503: Jamaica (135)

8120-8184: Charleston (65)

8185-8251: Castleton (66)

8252-8317: Yukon (66)

8318-8358: Gun Hill (41)

8359-8398: Kingsbridge (40)

Only thing that changed is that the QV order was given to Jamaica to make 135 buses in total for that depot.

QV will be apart of the next order... Given that those 6300-6400 Hybrids will be slated for retirement soon

Wouldn't be surprised if they end up with XDs

They will have the whole 8000-8089 when the moves are all said and done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this isn't the first time that a depot has more than 3/4 of the fleet.

In 1991, OF (later MCH) had 3/4s of the 1990-1991 TMC RTS buses: 8000-8089, 8170-8185, 8270-8292 & 8340-8354 before the latter 3 list (8170-8185, 8270-8292 & 8350-8354) went to MV in 1993

In 1993, CS had 2/3s of the Orion 5s: 173-254, 292-299 & 306-316

in 1999, the 2 older SI depots together had the Orion 5s 6140-6349, with CA getting 6140-6259

the same year, YU had the bulk of MCI 102WDSS 1860-1989

When MTA Bus was born in 2004, 3 years later, CP (formally QSC) started out with just 60 MCIs. it grew to 165 since then.

When WF opened in 2003, Orion 7 CNGs 7660-7819 found themselves a home there.

 

Larger fleets do find themselves in one depot

 

 

In 1993, Casey Stengel had #173-232, #291-297 and #299-300. The rest went to Kingsbridge IIRC.

 

QV will be apart of the next order... Given that those 6300-6400 Hybrids will be slated for retirement soon

Wouldn't be surprised if they end up with XDs

They will have the whole 8000-8089 when the moves are all said and done

 

They "may" get more NGs too. Can't rule that out.

Edited by The TransitMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charleston will be 100% lfs when all is said and done. The NGs will go to the mainland and replace other buses that need to be retired.

I see... I just hope Staten Island keeps these new buses up.  If they don't, the blame rests squarely on the depots.  I was on the island Tuesday night and rode a new Prevost in (2639 IIRC) and new Prevost out (25XX IIRC) and some of those new Prevosts are already taking a beating.  Gashes on the side of the bus... We're talking some of the 25XXs and 26XXs too.  Unbelievable... As a taxpayer, I have a serious issue with the way Staten Island depots maintain their buses, and apparently others do too.  All depots should have the same maintenance standards. Either there are some seriously careless drivers or these buses are just being destroyed by someone within the depot.  I can't understand how those buses take such a beating when they've barely been on the road.

Edited by Via Garibaldi 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should do what you always do: Write an email about it. Hopefully, if they get enough complaints, they will start maintaining the newer buses better.

I may consider doing just that. It's insane to see these buses which cost a good 500k a piece or more already banged up and it looks like in some cases, someone just takes something and bangs these buses up. I've always noticed that Castleton either gets banged up buses from Yukon for express bus service OR if they get "new buses" there's always a few that are already banged up.  I saw a 25XX supposedly new on the X10 this way on the outside.  Then what happens is Staten Island gets short on buses and starts having to borrow buses from other depots which just leads to more problems with bus shortages and buses having to be replaced sooner than they should be.

Edited by Via Garibaldi 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should do what you always do: Write an email about it. Hopefully, if they get enough complaints, they will start maintaining the newer buses better.

 

Maybe they'll start maintaining buses, period. Staten Island maintainers have a reputation for doing all work on overtime and refusing to even look at a bus during their 8-hour "straight-time" shifts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they'll start maintaining buses, period. Staten Island maintainers have a reputation for doing all work on overtime and refusing to even look at a bus during their 8-hour "straight-time" shifts.

I lived on Staten Island for a number of years, and despite what Cait Sith has stated in previous posts about maintenance being better there, I don't buy it.  Management at the depots in question has a history of doing the bare minimum in all areas, and I don't think very much has changed.  The buses look a little better (they should considering how many new buses they're getting) and service is a little better, but overall I don't think management is that much better.  I look at the buses from 2013 that Charleston has and they look in worse shape than some of the buses from (MTA) Bus which are MUCH older.  There's something very wrong with that picture, and I certainly don't understand why maintenance isn't uniform across the board.  I wish someone could give more insight into this (and I say this seriously).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.