Jump to content

Fleet Swap Discussion Thread


INDman

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LGA Link N train said:
  1. Simple Answer TRANSFER ALL OF THE R32's TO THE (A) LINE AND THE ROCKAWAY PARK (S)
  2. Don't even bother with the other lines
  3. R32's are banned from montague
  4. (B)(C)(D)(E)(F)(G) (M)(N)(Q) (R)(W) won't work, to say nothing for the (L) cause of CBTC
  5.  

If I had to guess, and, yes I’m aware there is the obvious elephant, I really think it’ll go to the (B). Let’s see, though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 8.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

On 11/9/2017 at 1:11 PM, R42N said:

I think the issue is here is that it becomes a process of elimination. 

Here are the cited issues with all the lines when the R179s come in:
 

(A) : Too “packed” 

(B) : Montague a potential re-route (A possibility to some)

(C) : Not outdoors enough, will get more displaced pax at Broadway Junction, R179s will be added.

(D) : Montague a potential re-route

(E) : Not Outdoors; too packed for SMEE. 

(F) : Too Packed for SMEE. 

(G) : Plausible, but OPTO and overcrowding could be an issue

(J) / (Z): No SMEE on Jamaica during Canarsie shutdown. 

(M) : No SMEE on Jamaica/Bridge during Canarsie.

(N) / (W) : Montague in-schedule

(Q) : Montague a potential re-route

(R) : Montague in-schedule 

(S) : Franklin is OPTO, Rockaway is plausible, but won’t use up fleet

 

Frankly, the only route that hasn’t been discussed is the Staten Island Railway, or (SIR). Which would work, but it would need modification and then you’d have displaced R44’s on your hands. 

 

On 11/9/2017 at 3:31 PM, Union Tpke said:

They can't go on the (J). They need all the capacity they can get during the Canarsie shutdown, and the low MDBF can make it even harder to reach 24 TPH.

 

On 11/9/2017 at 7:04 PM, Union Tpke said:

They would prefer not to have them on the (C) because it is completely underground.

We don’t really seem to have a lot of options here. The R32s have to go somewhere. I honestly think the (A) to Far Rockaway might be the best option. Yes, once again the (A) would be getting subway cars in their “twilight years,” just like it did in 2008-09 when the R40s and a large number of R42s were assigned there. Not to mention that the R32s might be better at handling the crowds with eight extra entry doors on each side of the train. 

Yes, I’m fully aware that the R32s don’t have digital side signs like the R46s and NTT cars do. I really don’t think that should be an issue. Certainly no more so than when the R40s and 42s ran there in their last years. Not to mention the R32/38 “salad trains” that ran there for years, both pre- and post-GOH. 

If the R32s’ low MDBF rate is such an issue, then can’t they be put through some sort of robust maintenance program to bring it up?

Edited by T to Dyre Avenue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I’d narrow it down to the (A)(B)(D) (F) and (G).

 

The (A) has a decent portion outdoors, so that shouldn’t put a burden on the A/C, and as the previous comment said, there’s more doors to board from during rush hour. However, there’s the chance that the rollsigns get erroneous and people don’t know if it goes to the Rockaways (which already happens anyway)

The (B) only runs on weekdays (at least right now) and Coney Island maintains its cars very well, so giving the cars a break on the weekends adds a little to their useful lives. Rarely rerouted through montague. Feasible option.

The (D) could also be considered, maybe a train or two assigned there just to try things out. There’s plenty of fast Express portions (CPW and the short sixth av express). There’s many layup/unused tracks along the (D) so if a train breaks down it wouldn’t be too bad.

A lot of people think the (F) is too “crowded”. But the 32s would come in handy going fast on QBL EXP and eventually the Culver EXP if it happens. Also increases amount of doors to board from (assuming the seven or so R46s are displaced)

The (G) runs OPTO, but that shouldn’t be a thing when the Canarsie shut down happens. It would help to run eight or ten car trains, and the 32s themselves are faster than the hippos currently on the line. The (G) only shares tracks with the (F) so if a train breaks down it won’t be a midtown calamity.

Personally I would go with the (B) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BayParkwayW said:

Personally I’d narrow it down to the (A)(B)(D) (F) and (G).

 

The (A) has a decent portion outdoors, so that shouldn’t put a burden on the A/C, and as the previous comment said, there’s more doors to board from during rush hour. However, there’s the chance that the rollsigns get erroneous and people don’t know if it goes to the Rockaways (which already happens anyway)

The (B) only runs on weekdays (at least right now) and Coney Island maintains its cars very well, so giving the cars a break on the weekends adds a little to their useful lives. Rarely rerouted through montague. Feasible option.

The (D) could also be considered, maybe a train or two assigned there just to try things out. There’s plenty of fast Express portions (CPW and the short sixth av express). There’s many layup/unused tracks along the (D) so if a train breaks down it wouldn’t be too bad.

A lot of people think the (F) is too “crowded”. But the 32s would come in handy going fast on QBL EXP and eventually the Culver EXP if it happens. Also increases amount of doors to board from (assuming the seven or so R46s are displaced)

The (G) runs OPTO, but that shouldn’t be a thing when the Canarsie shut down happens. It would help to run eight or ten car trains, and the 32s themselves are faster than the hippos currently on the line. The (G) only shares tracks with the (F) so if a train breaks down it won’t be a midtown calamity.

Personally I would go with the (B) 

I would rule out the (D) and (F) as the (D) is too heavily used and because the (F) breaking down on QBL will be hell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/5/2011 at 11:46 PM, Shortline Bus said:

The R-32's which are arguably along with the redbirds are the best and longest-serving trains in NYC subway history. With that said and approaching 50 years of service, it long past it's retirement. The (MTA) should have just brought another few R-160's also so that the entire (A) and (C) line would be mostly R-46's along with a few R-160's. Please no haters lol from R-32's lovers, but just like a 1979 Caddy Deville, there a time and place to move on.

R-32's should have been replaced a while ago. While the (MTA) they have no choice but to keep them until the new cars arrive they should have still bought a handful more R-160's  since the (A) and (C) still have R-32's running

Edited by LexingtonAveExpress
Typographical Mistake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just played catch-up on this thread and the issues at hand. I'm not familiar with the Montague issue and I didn't see much elaboration on it so could someone explain? I assume it has something to do with the reconstruction work that was done after Sandy.

After actually reviewing the issues and the proposals, I'd probably say the (J) and the (G) are the best options for the R32s/R42s, although the (G) being a primarily underground route poses its own issues with HVAC failure, the relative isolation allows any disruptions caused from failures to remain isolated to the (G) - not great for those riders but prevents widespread delay in the rest of the system.

While these cars have run on the (C) for years, I really don't think it's fair to say that was the best place for them in any remote capacity, considering the maintenance issues as well as the route being entirely underground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Threxx said:

Just played catch-up on this thread and the issues at hand. I'm not familiar with the Montague issue and I didn't see much elaboration on it so could someone explain? I assume it has something to do with the reconstruction work that was done after Sandy.

After actually reviewing the issues and the proposals, I'd probably say the (J) and the (G) are the best options for the R32s/R42s, although the (G) being a primarily underground route poses its own issues with HVAC failure, the relative isolation allows any disruptions caused from failures to remain isolated to the (G) - not great for those riders but prevents widespread delay in the rest of the system.

While these cars have run on the (C) for years, I really don't think it's fair to say that was the best place for them in any remote capacity, considering the maintenance issues as well as the route being entirely underground.

The Montague issue is that the tunnel was not rebuilt to fit the R32s, hence why them being on the Southern Division (minus the (G) ) is a risk. I'm not sure, but aren't all other 60 ft B division SMEEs banned from Montague too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Threxx said:

Just played catch-up on this thread and the issues at hand. I'm not familiar with the Montague issue and I didn't see much elaboration on it so could someone explain? I assume it has something to do with the reconstruction work that was done after Sandy.

After actually reviewing the issues and the proposals, I'd probably say the (J) and the (G) are the best options for the R32s/R42s, although the (G) being a primarily underground route poses its own issues with HVAC failure, the relative isolation allows any disruptions caused from failures to remain isolated to the (G) - not great for those riders but prevents widespread delay in the rest of the system.

While these cars have run on the (C) for years, I really don't think it's fair to say that was the best place for them in any remote capacity, considering the maintenance issues as well as the route being entirely underground.

When they rebuilt the Montague tunnels, the clearance for trains was slightly smaller than it was previously. To elaborate, it was condensed in such a way that none of the flat-sided cars (the 32s, 42s, the TOMM set, etc.) cannot fit through the tunnel without scraping the electrical supports (someone correct me if I'm wrong on that part) that were installed during the reconstruction.

1 hour ago, Union Tpke said:

For the hundredth time, they are coming off the (J).

Some of us don't have the luxury of time to go through every thread and every post religiously. A little patience goes a long way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, to settle things here is a nice list of things to photograph, as they will be disappearing over the next few months/years. Wish I could be up front and explain exactly what is currently planned to happen, but I can't, so I'll imply what I can instead. 

 

These are not crew room rumors, they're based on facts. Union Tpke can concur on this as well I assume.

 

R32 and R160 (C) trains

R32/R42 (J)(Z) trains

R68/A (G) trains

R68/A (B) trains

R46 (F) and (R) trains

R160 (N) and (W) trains (maybe)

 

And enjoy the RFW's on the (B) *and* (G) lines!

Edited by Dj Hammers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Dj Hammers said:

Ok, to settle things, here is a nice list of things to photograph, as they will be disappearing over the next few months/years. Wish I could be up front and explain exactly what is currently planned to happen, but I can't, so I'll imply what I can instead.

 

R32 and R160 (C) trains

R32/R42 (J)(Z) trains

R68/A (G) trains

R68/A (B) trains

R46 (F) and (R) trains

R160 (N) and (W) trains (maybe)

 

And enjoy the RFW's on the (B) *and* (G) lines!

There we go. That's as close to accurate as we can get. Thanks for the clarification DJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MysteriousBtrain said:

There we go. That's as close to accurate as we can get. Thanks for the clarification DJ.

Thanks for that list. It makes sense, with the exception of the 160's on Astoria.

If the (N) and (W) is all old tech, how will they be able to switch the rollsigns in a pinch, if three OTT (N)'s come in a row, how will they dispatch a (W) ?

EDIT: Oh, I see it now. The OTT you are talking about doesn’t have rollsigns, that’ll be weird.

Edited by R42N
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Dj Hammers said:

Ok, to settle things here is a nice list of things to photograph, as they will be disappearing over the next few months/years. Wish I could be up front and explain exactly what is currently planned to happen, but I can't, so I'll imply what I can instead. 

 

These are not crew room rumors, they're based on facts. Union Tpke can concur on this as well I assume.

 

R32 and R160 (C) trains

R32/R42 (J)(Z) trains

R68/A (G) trains

R68/A (B) trains

R46 (F) and (R) trains

R160 (N) and (W) trains (maybe)

 

And enjoy the RFW's on the (B) *and* (G) lines!

I can concur, and I would like to mention that the pols in Astoria are annoyed the they will be receiving older cars, but they have been notified that they will likely get new cars soon enough. In addition, I have heard that the T/Os from Astoria would like one type of train set to be familiar with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LGA Link N train said:

Assuming that there are about 100 R32's left.

Keep 60-80 on the (A)

And leave 20-25 on the Rockaway Park (S)

 

They aren't going to the shuttle. Did you read this?

 

29 minutes ago, Dj Hammers said:

Ok, to settle things here is a nice list of things to photograph, as they will be disappearing over the next few months/years. Wish I could be up front and explain exactly what is currently planned to happen, but I can't, so I'll imply what I can instead. 

 

These are not crew room rumors, they're based on facts. Union Tpke can concur on this as well I assume.

And enjoy the RFW's on the (B) *and* (G) lines!

What could that last line possibly be talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Union Tpke said:

I can concur, and I would like to mention that the pols in Astoria are annoyed the they will be receiving older cars, but they have been notified that they will likely get new cars soon enough. In addition, I have heard that the T/Os from Astoria would like one type of train set to be familiar with.

If it’s the R46 (which I now think it is), then, geez, that’ll be weird. The 46 is such a weird choice for the (N) and (W), it’s synonymous with the (R) train, and is so foreign to Astoria.

The only good news is that then Astoria will be the first to get R211’s, whenever they come. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Union Tpke said:

I can concur, and I would like to mention that the pols in Astoria are annoyed the they will be receiving older cars, but they have been notified that they will likely get new cars soon enough. In addition, I have heard that the T/Os from Astoria would like one type of train set to be familiar with.

Can't win everything lol. Just look at the (6) . I also feel C riders may also complain when they see R46s on the C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MysteriousBtrain said:

Can't win everything lol. Just look at the (6) . I also feel C riders may also complain when they see R46s on the C.

See, if it’s the R68, then I truthfully have no problem, but if it’s the R46, the ugly step-brother, than I’m going to hate this change. 

Strange how such subtle differences is so noticeable. 

Edited by R42N
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, R42N said:

If it’s the R46 (which I now think it is), then, geez, that’ll be weird. The 46 is such a weird choice for the (N) and (W), it’s synonymous with the (R) train, and is so foreign to Astoria.

The only good news is that then Astoria will be the first to get R211’s, whenever they come. 

I wouldn't be so sure of that... Some promises were made to influential politicians along the (R) line a few years ago re: R211s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, D to 96 St said:

My assumptions:

(C) has the 4-car R179s with a few R46s. 

(J)(Z) are fully R160/R179. 

(F) is fully R160. 

(R) is also R160 with a few R68s?

(N)(W) might run with R46s, and would retain most R68s. 

(B) has the R32s, with most R68s. 

(G) is fully R160, with some R46s. 

The C won't be running 480 and 600 foot trains. Why would R68s go to QBL when the line will have CBTC ready in about 2021?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.