Union Tpke Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12776 Posted June 18, 2016 Does this route seem logical to you? Screen Shot 2016-06-15 at 1.53.51 PM by spicker613, on Flickr 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Javier Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12777 Posted June 18, 2016 Uh...what the 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12778 Posted June 18, 2016 I love how the transfers on the new & strip map are all in Standard-Medium... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
46Dover Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12779 Posted June 18, 2016 I want to ask something Why was the train stop changed at 207 Street from Washington Heights to Inwood? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
46Dover Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12780 Posted June 18, 2016 Second Question: When the was made to terminate at 145 Street back in 1988 (I think), were there any modifications to be made to the station to make it a crew terminal (like a Brighton Beach or a Euclid Av)? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12781 Posted June 18, 2016 Does this route seem logical to you? Screen Shot 2016-06-15 at 1.53.51 PM by spicker613, on Flickr Someone screwed up with the path-finding algorithm. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12782 Posted June 18, 2016 Does this route seem logical to you? <image removed> I think the computer system is designed to give one outlandish route for every directions request. It does the same thing on the On the Go displays. They'll give you two good routes and the third will likely be some random roundabout route. I love how the transfers on the new & strip map are all in Standard-Medium... Technically, the route bullets with the exception of the , and should always be in Standard/Akzidenz-Grotesk as that's how they were registered many moons ago. I want to ask something Why was the train stop changed at 207 Street from Washington Heights to Inwood? Probably because 207 Street isn't in Washington Heights. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I love Trains99 Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12783 Posted June 18, 2016 On weekdays. Weekends, the was the sole train on the Brighton line until the changes began happening. Thanks for filling in I forgot all about the running along Brighton on weekdays. But still the was running along Brighton local at all times before 1973. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I love Trains99 Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12784 Posted June 18, 2016 Going to correct a couple things The Train was cut from Brooklyn during Middays and Weekends from April to November of 1995 due to Bridge work with the Trains replacing it running to 21st Street. The went 4th Local on Weekday evenings/nights/weekends up until 2002. From 1993-1995 the went to 86th Street only due to some work at Coney Island After 1994 the went back to express along 4 Av during all times except late nights. You probably talking about 1961 service. The rush hour local service was always provided by the up until 2010 On April 13, 1986 when the Manhattan Bridge project began on 6 Av side, did the have 3 terminals (Bay Ridge 95 St , 9 Av, and Bay Parkway?) And why did the MTA route the away from Brighton Line? I love how the transfers on the new & strip map are all in Standard-Medium... The strip maps together looks bad. The local stops on the is missing. The lex line is on far left of the map while 7 Av is on far right. The map makes you look like your eyes are going all over the place. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHV9218 Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12785 Posted June 18, 2016 I love how the transfers on the new & strip map are all in Standard-Medium... Yeah, but they couldn't get their act together to put the main bullet in Standard... Those little inconsistencies are so annoying to my eyes. Technically, the route bullets with the exception of the , and should always be in Standard/Akzidenz-Grotesk as that's how they were registered many moons ago. And the , depending on which standards manual you follow! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresh Pond Posted June 18, 2016 Share #12786 Posted June 18, 2016 The strip maps together looks bad. The local stops on the is missing. The lex line is on far left of the map while 7 Av is on far right. The map makes you look like your eyes are going all over the place. The strip maps never showed the local stops along 7 Av, it would be too many dots to show. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Threxx Posted June 19, 2016 Share #12787 Posted June 19, 2016 Random historical question... any reason why Jay Street-MetroTech on the (formerly Lawrence Street) has no trackside tile? It's out of the Dual Contracts style to neglect this and there's no real documentation on why this station got passed over. It's especially weird when the mezzanine is completely tiled. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted June 19, 2016 Share #12788 Posted June 19, 2016 (edited) After 1994 the went back to express along 4 Av during all times except late nights. You probably talking about 1961 service. The rush hour local service was always provided by the up until 2010 No I'm not. From 1994 up until 2002, Evening/Late Nights/Weekends it ran local in Brooklyn. I remember that clearly because I've ridden the that line before at the time (Beginning of 1999) and the old 1998 map for example even says it. Here, the 2000 Schedule says otherwise http://web.archive.org/web/20000919160736/http://www.lirr.org/nyct/service/pdf/tncur.pdf Edited June 19, 2016 by Daniel The Cool 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
46Dover Posted June 19, 2016 Share #12789 Posted June 19, 2016 It seems like every weekend in New York City, there's a parade or a G.O. reroute that happens every time I come into the city on a day off. Maybe I should plan my days off during the week 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I love Trains99 Posted June 19, 2016 Share #12790 Posted June 19, 2016 No I'm not. From 1994 up until 2002, Evening/Late Nights/Weekends it ran local in Brooklyn. I remember that clearly because I've ridden the that line before at the time (Beginning of 1999) and the old 1998 map for example even says it. Here, the 2000 Schedule says otherwise http://web.archive.org/web/20000919160736/http://www.lirr.org/nyct/service/pdf/tncur.pdf The time schedule does not show the running local along 4 Av on the Weekends. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance Posted June 19, 2016 Share #12791 Posted June 19, 2016 (edited) I'm looking at a scan of the 1997 map and the service guide lists the as a 4th Avenue local during off-hours (evenings, late nights and weekends). EDIT: After reviewing the early '94 and 2000 maps, I can concur that the did run local on 4th Avenue during off-hours. Prior to 1994, the was a full local at all times. It wouldn't be until the got booted off the express tracks that the would get some semblance of express service that hadn't been seen since '86. Edited June 19, 2016 by Lance 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3F Posted June 19, 2016 Share #12792 Posted June 19, 2016 Random historical question... any reason why Jay Street-MetroTech on the (formerly Lawrence Street) has no trackside tile? It's out of the Dual Contracts style to neglect this and there's no real documentation on why this station got passed over. It's especially weird when the mezzanine is completely tiled.Also, the same could be asked for Grand Central on the and Lexington Avenue 53 Street on the . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R10 2952 Posted June 19, 2016 Share #12793 Posted June 19, 2016 I'm looking at a scan of the 1997 map and the service guide lists the as a 4th Avenue local during off-hours (evenings, late nights and weekends). EDIT: After reviewing the early '94 and 2000 maps, I can concur that the did run local on 4th Avenue during off-hours. Prior to 1994, the was a full local at all times. It wouldn't be until the got booted off the express tracks that the would get some semblance of express service that hadn't been seen since '86. Yeah I remember the was a strange bird back in those days- heck, I even remember seeing an R46 show up on that line once in the late '90s. Also, I just realized I've never seen a station musician at any of the elevated lines- anyone else notice this? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I love Trains99 Posted June 20, 2016 Share #12794 Posted June 20, 2016 Yeah I remember the was a strange bird back in those days- heck, I even remember seeing an R46 show up on that line once in the late '90s. Also, I just realized I've never seen a station musician at any of the elevated lines- anyone else notice this? The stopped using R46 after May 1987. If you caught R46 on the that was probably a routed 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted June 20, 2016 Share #12795 Posted June 20, 2016 The stopped using R46 after May 1987. If you caught R46 on the that was probably a routed Nope there was an R46 in 1990s. There was a picture of it off an railfan site (Don't think its there anymore) And keep in mind, just because a line is not assigned to a certain subway car, doesn't mean they haven't used it for an occasion if needed 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GojiMet86 Posted June 20, 2016 Share #12796 Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) I've heard of an R46 on the post-late 1980s. There has definitely been one on the after the 9/11 reroutes. Edited June 20, 2016 by GojiMet86 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I love Trains99 Posted June 20, 2016 Share #12797 Posted June 20, 2016 I've heard of an R46 on the post-late 1980s. There has definitely been one on the after the 9/11 reroutes. The only used R46 temporarily from the . I don't count R46 truly being on the 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted June 21, 2016 Share #12798 Posted June 21, 2016 The only used R46 temporarily from the . I don't count R46 truly being on the That makes no sense... 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted June 22, 2016 Share #12799 Posted June 22, 2016 It totally made sense for the MTA to send a train ahead of a Kings Highway–bound with a Coney Island–bound right behind it. /s That Coney Island–bound didn’t skip Bergen, Carroll, and Smith Streets. Guess what the delay amounted to after all the waiting? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHV9218 Posted June 22, 2016 Share #12800 Posted June 22, 2016 Mixed consist on the today. That's 5152 and 2784. Think the last time I rode a mixed set would have been R32/38s together, pretty cool to be on. No braking issues. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.